From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Redelings Subject: Inverted call-graph broken? Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:25:39 -0400 Message-ID: <5634C153.8020001@gmail.com> References: <55D20AF9.9040705@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-qg0-f46.google.com ([209.85.192.46]:34444 "EHLO mail-qg0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752440AbbJaNZl (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:25:41 -0400 Received: by qgem9 with SMTP id m9so83082579qge.1 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 06:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.11.14] (cpe-24-163-95-39.nc.res.rr.com. [24.163.95.39]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s21sm4402386qkl.36.2015.10.31.06.25.40 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 31 Oct 2015 06:25:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55D20AF9.9040705@gmail.com> Sender: linux-perf-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Hi, I've been using perf with '--call-graph=dwarf' -- very useful! I'd like to view call graphs in 'perf report' in "inverted" order. Adding '-G' to 'perf report' appears to have no effect, though. (Also '--call-graph=fractal,caller' has no effect.) Am I missing something obvious? -BenRI