From: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel.opensrc@gmail.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: agnel.joel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: probe_finder: continue if atleast one probe point found
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 20:35:55 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D2DB9B.4090500@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456658087-4107-1-git-send-email-agnel.joel@gmail.com>
Hi, Joel
perf subsystem's maintainers are
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
(or Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>)
AFAIK,
When sending some patches, it would be better to add them into To: or Cc:
Thanks,
Taeung
On 02/28/2016 08:14 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Sometimes for inline functions, perf probe can fail such as if an arguments are
> requested at probe points. This is probably because when the compiler inlines,
> for some instances it optimizes away arguments. Either way, the DWARF has
> missing arguments for certain probe points of inline functions causing 'perf
> probe' to fail. I noticed this when probing the C library that ships with my
> distribution. With the following patch I am successfully able to record kprobe
> events with arguments.
>
> Test
> ----
> ./perf probe \
> -k ./vmlinux -s ./ -x /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 -a 'malloc bytes' -v
>
> Without the patch
> -----------------
> Matched function: __libc_malloc
> found inline addr: 0x831a6
> Probe point found: malloc_atfork+150
> Searching 'bytes' variable in context.
> Converting variable bytes into trace event.
> bytes type is long unsigned int.
> found inline addr: 0x844a0
> Probe point found: __libc_malloc+0
> Searching 'bytes' variable in context.
> Converting variable bytes into trace event.
> bytes type is long unsigned int.
> found inline addr: 0x8463b
> Probe point found: __malloc_get_state+11
> Searching 'bytes' variable in context.
> Failed to find 'bytes' in this function.
> An error occurred in debuginfo analysis (-2).
> Error: Failed to add events. Reason: No such file or directory (Code: -2)
>
> With the patch
> --------------
> Open Debuginfo file: /usr/lib/debug/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.21.so
> Try to find probe point from debuginfo.
> Symbol malloc address found : 844a0
> Matched function: __libc_malloc
> found inline addr: 0x831a6
> Probe point found: malloc_atfork+150
> Searching 'bytes' variable in context.
> Converting variable bytes into trace event.
> bytes type is long unsigned int.
> found inline addr: 0x844a0
> Probe point found: __libc_malloc+0
> Searching 'bytes' variable in context.
> Converting variable bytes into trace event.
> bytes type is long unsigned int.
> found inline addr: 0x8463b
> Probe point found: __malloc_get_state+11
> Searching 'bytes' variable in context.
> Failed to find 'bytes' in this function.
> Probe point error, ignoring. Atleast one probe point found
> found inline addr: 0x84bba
> Probe point found: __libc_realloc+410
> Searching 'bytes' variable in context.
> Failed to find 'bytes' in this function.
> Probe point error, ignoring. Atleast one probe point found
> found inline addr: 0x84d08
> ...
> Probe point error, ignoring. Atleast one probe point found
> Found 3 probe_trace_events.
> Opening /sys/kernel/debug/tracing//uprobe_events write=1
> Writing event: p:probe_libc/malloc /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.21.so:0x831a6 bytes=%bp:u64
> Writing event: p:probe_libc/malloc_1 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.21.so:0x844a0 bytes=%di:u64
> Writing event: p:probe_libc/malloc_2 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.21.so:0x85af7 bytes=%di:u64
> Added new events:
> probe_libc:malloc (on malloc in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.21.so with bytes)
> probe_libc:malloc_1 (on malloc in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.21.so with bytes)
> probe_libc:malloc_2 (on malloc in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.21.so with bytes)
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <agnel.joel@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> index 4ce5c5e..3ac9481 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> @@ -1255,6 +1255,10 @@ end:
> if (ret) {
> clear_probe_trace_event(tev);
> tf->ntevs--;
> + if (tf->ntevs != 0) {
> + pr_debug("Ignoring error as atleast one probe point found.\n");
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> }
> free(args);
> return ret;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-28 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-28 11:14 [RFC] perf: probe_finder: continue if atleast one probe point found Joel Fernandes
2016-02-28 11:35 ` Taeung Song [this message]
[not found] ` <CAD=GYpZtDb3ugJRFQg1karJ_Fb7RsGPpSu0ZbL8i9Oy8x5eZ9A@mail.gmail.com>
2016-02-29 14:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-03-01 3:09 ` 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
2016-03-01 4:29 ` 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
2016-03-01 10:34 ` Joel Fernandes
2016-03-01 10:36 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56D2DB9B.4090500@gmail.com \
--to=treeze.taeung@gmail.com \
--cc=agnel.joel@gmail.com \
--cc=joel.opensrc@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).