From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com>
To: "linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Tutorial/git's guide to c-state counters on Intel?
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 12:30:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <577D5C58.20802@hpe.com> (raw)
I am presently trying to tease-out why a "slight" change in kernel
(4.4.7 to 4.4.11) might result in a large change in some VM to VM
netperf TCP_RR performance. I've seen that if I set the system firmware
to be in a static high performance mode rather than a dynamic power
management (by the firmware) mode the gap narrows considerably.
I've come across:
cstate_core/c3-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
cstate_core/c6-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
cstate_core/c7-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
cstate_pkg/c2-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
cstate_pkg/c3-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
cstate_pkg/c6-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
cstate_pkg/c7-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
and when I count those via perf comparing the two, back in the dynamic
power managment mode, I can see more package c* residency on the slower
setup (newer kernel). That fits with the hypothesis that the slower
request/response performance is coming from going into and out of sleep
states more - something which has been known to affect the likes of a
netperf TCP_RR test for years. I don't see nearly as large a
difference between the core c* counts though, which leaves me wondering
why/how that might be.
The processors in question here are E5-2640:
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 0 @ 2.50GHz
happy benchmarking,
rick jones
reply other threads:[~2016-07-06 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=577D5C58.20802@hpe.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hpe.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).