linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] x86: perf: Refactor misc flag assignments
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 11:03:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65675ed8-e569-47f8-b1eb-40c853751bfb@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241105195603.2317483-5-coltonlewis@google.com>



On 2024-11-05 2:56 p.m., Colton Lewis wrote:
> Break the assignment logic for misc flags into their own respective
> functions to reduce the complexity of the nested logic.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> ---
>  arch/x86/events/core.c            | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> index d19e939f3998..24910c625e3d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> @@ -3011,16 +3011,34 @@ unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	return regs->ip + code_segment_base(regs);
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned long common_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	if (regs->flags & PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT)
> +		return PERF_RECORD_MISC_EXACT_IP;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +unsigned long perf_arch_guest_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	unsigned long guest_state = perf_guest_state();
> +	unsigned long flags = common_misc_flags(regs);
> +
> +	if (guest_state & PERF_GUEST_USER)
> +		flags |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_USER;
> +	else if (guest_state & PERF_GUEST_ACTIVE)
> +		flags |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_KERNEL;
> +

The logic of setting the GUEST_KERNEL flag is implicitly changed here.

For the current code, the GUEST_KERNEL flag is set for !PERF_GUEST_USER,
which include both guest_in_kernel and guest_in_NMI.

With the above change, the GUEST_KERNEL flag should be only set for the
guest_in_kernel case.
IIUC, this is the series's target, right?

If so, could you please move the explanation into this patch?
For x86, the behavior has already been changed since this patch.

Thanks,
Kan

> +	return flags;
> +}
> +
>  unsigned long perf_arch_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
>  	unsigned int guest_state = perf_guest_state();
> -	int misc = 0;
> +	unsigned long misc = common_misc_flags(regs);
>  
>  	if (guest_state) {
> -		if (guest_state & PERF_GUEST_USER)
> -			misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_USER;
> -		else
> -			misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_KERNEL;
> +		misc |= perf_arch_guest_misc_flags(regs);
>  	} else {
>  		if (user_mode(regs))
>  			misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
> @@ -3028,9 +3046,6 @@ unsigned long perf_arch_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  			misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_KERNEL;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (regs->flags & PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT)
> -		misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_EXACT_IP;
> -
>  	return misc;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> index feb87bf3d2e9..d95f902acc52 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> @@ -538,7 +538,9 @@ struct x86_perf_regs {
>  
>  extern unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  extern unsigned long perf_arch_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs);
> +extern unsigned long perf_arch_guest_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  #define perf_arch_misc_flags(regs)	perf_arch_misc_flags(regs)
> +#define perf_arch_guest_misc_flags(regs)	perf_arch_guest_misc_flags(regs)
>  
>  #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
>  


  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-06 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-05 19:55 [PATCH v6 0/5] Correct perf sampling with Guest VMs Colton Lewis
2024-11-05 19:55 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] arm: perf: Drop unused functions Colton Lewis
2024-11-07 11:27   ` Will Deacon
2024-11-05 19:55 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] perf: Hoist perf_instruction_pointer() and perf_misc_flags() Colton Lewis
2024-11-05 19:56 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] powerpc: perf: Use perf_arch_instruction_pointer() Colton Lewis
2024-11-05 19:56 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] x86: perf: Refactor misc flag assignments Colton Lewis
2024-11-06 16:03   ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2024-11-06 20:02     ` Oliver Upton
2024-11-06 20:33       ` Liang, Kan
2024-11-06 20:51         ` Oliver Upton
2024-11-05 19:56 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] perf: Correct perf sampling with guest VMs Colton Lewis
2024-11-06 16:07   ` Liang, Kan
2024-11-06 19:53     ` Oliver Upton
2024-11-06 20:38       ` Liang, Kan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65675ed8-e569-47f8-b1eb-40c853751bfb@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).