public inbox for linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	kan.liang@linux.intel.com, song@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	eddyz87@gmail.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
	haoluo@google.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/2] bpf: Hold the perf callchain entry until used completely
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 12:35:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6dbaff1f-09d3-421a-9813-c9c1cda8e7d8@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzZLCVMXFyfD9R0SUq_3Sinc_uFzJWnDcwZtdhJWpB3+uA@mail.gmail.com>

在 2026/1/10 07:47, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2026 at 8:00 AM Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> 在 2025/12/23 14:29, Tao Chen 写道:
>>> 在 2025/12/17 17:33, Tao Chen 写道:
>>>> As Alexei noted, get_perf_callchain() return values may be reused
>>>> if a task is preempted after the BPF program enters migrate disable
>>>> mode. The perf_callchain_entres has a small stack of entries, and
>>>> we can reuse it as follows:
>>>>
>>>> 1. get the perf callchain entry
>>>> 2. BPF use...
>>>> 3. put the perf callchain entry
>>>>
>>>> And Peter suggested that get_recursion_context used with preemption
>>>> disabled, so we should disable preemption at BPF side.
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
>>>> ---
>>>>    kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>>    1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>>>> index da3d328f5c1..3bdd99a630d 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
>>>> @@ -210,13 +210,14 @@ static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset(struct
>>>> bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs,
>>>>    }
>>>>    static struct perf_callchain_entry *
>>>> -get_callchain_entry_for_task(struct task_struct *task, u32 max_depth)
>>>> +get_callchain_entry_for_task(int *rctx, struct task_struct *task, u32
>>>> max_depth)
>>>>    {
>>>>    #ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE
>>>>        struct perf_callchain_entry *entry;
>>>> -    int rctx;
>>>> -    entry = get_callchain_entry(&rctx);
>>>> +    preempt_disable();
>>>> +    entry = get_callchain_entry(rctx);
>>>> +    preempt_enable();
>>>>        if (!entry)
>>>>            return NULL;
>>>> @@ -238,8 +239,6 @@ get_callchain_entry_for_task(struct task_struct
>>>> *task, u32 max_depth)
>>>>                to[i] = (u64)(from[i]);
>>>>        }
>>>> -    put_callchain_entry(rctx);
>>>> -
>>>>        return entry;
>>>>    #else /* CONFIG_STACKTRACE */
>>>>        return NULL;
>>>> @@ -320,6 +319,34 @@ static long __bpf_get_stackid(struct bpf_map *map,
>>>>        return id;
>>>>    }
>>>> +static struct perf_callchain_entry *
>>>> +bpf_get_perf_callchain(int *rctx, struct pt_regs *regs, bool kernel,
>>>> bool user,
>>>> +               int max_stack, bool crosstask)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx ctx;
>>>> +    struct perf_callchain_entry *entry;
>>>> +
>>>> +    preempt_disable();
>>>> +    entry = get_callchain_entry(rctx);
>>>> +    preempt_enable();
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (unlikely(!entry))
>>>> +        return NULL;
>>>> +
>>>> +    __init_perf_callchain_ctx(&ctx, entry, max_stack, false);
>>>> +    if (kernel)
>>>> +        __get_perf_callchain_kernel(&ctx, regs);
>>>> +    if (user && !crosstask)
>>>> +        __get_perf_callchain_user(&ctx, regs, 0);
>>>> +
>>>> +    return entry;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void bpf_put_perf_callchain(int rctx)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    put_callchain_entry(rctx);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>    BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map
>>>> *, map,
>>>>           u64, flags)
>>>>    {
>>>> @@ -328,20 +355,25 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *,
>>>> regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
>>>>        struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
>>>>        bool kernel = !user;
>>>>        u32 max_depth;
>>>> +    int rctx, ret;
>>>>        if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK |
>>>>                       BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP | BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID)))
>>>>            return -EINVAL;
>>>>        max_depth = stack_map_calculate_max_depth(map->value_size,
>>>> elem_size, flags);
>>>> -    trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, kernel, user, max_depth,
>>>> -                   false, false, 0);
>>>> +
>>>> +    trace = bpf_get_perf_callchain(&rctx, regs, kernel, user, max_depth,
>>>> +                       false);
>>>>        if (unlikely(!trace))
>>>>            /* couldn't fetch the stack trace */
>>>>            return -EFAULT;
>>>> -    return __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags);
>>>> +    ret = __bpf_get_stackid(map, trace, flags);
>>>> +    bpf_put_perf_callchain(rctx);
>>>> +
>>>> +    return ret;
>>>>    }
>>>>    const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stackid_proto = {
>>>> @@ -435,6 +467,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs,
>>>> struct task_struct *task,
>>>>        bool kernel = !user;
>>>>        int err = -EINVAL;
>>>>        u64 *ips;
>>>> +    int rctx;
>>>>        if (unlikely(flags & ~(BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK | BPF_F_USER_STACK |
>>>>                       BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID)))
>>>> @@ -467,18 +500,26 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs
>>>> *regs, struct task_struct *task,
>>>>            trace = trace_in;
>>>>            trace->nr = min_t(u32, trace->nr, max_depth);
>>>>        } else if (kernel && task) {
>>>> -        trace = get_callchain_entry_for_task(task, max_depth);
>>>> +        trace = get_callchain_entry_for_task(&rctx, task, max_depth);
>>>>        } else {
>>>> -        trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, kernel, user, max_depth,
>>>> -                       crosstask, false, 0);
>>>> +        trace = bpf_get_perf_callchain(&rctx, regs, kernel, user,
>>>> max_depth,
>>>> +                           crosstask);
>>>>        }
>>>> -    if (unlikely(!trace) || trace->nr < skip) {
>>>> +    if (unlikely(!trace)) {
>>>>            if (may_fault)
>>>>                rcu_read_unlock();
>>>>            goto err_fault;
>>>>        }
>>>> +    if (trace->nr < skip) {
>>>> +        if (may_fault)
>>>> +            rcu_read_unlock();
>>>> +        if (!trace_in)
>>>> +            bpf_put_perf_callchain(rctx);
>>>> +        goto err_fault;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>>        trace_nr = trace->nr - skip;
>>>>        copy_len = trace_nr * elem_size;
>>>> @@ -497,6 +538,9 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs,
>>>> struct task_struct *task,
>>>>        if (may_fault)
>>>>            rcu_read_unlock();
>>>> +    if (!trace_in)
>>>> +        bpf_put_perf_callchain(rctx);
>>>> +
>>>>        if (user_build_id)
>>>>            stack_map_get_build_id_offset(buf, trace_nr, user, may_fault);
>>>
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> As Alexei said, the patch needs your ack, please review again, thanks.
>>>
>>
>> ping...
> 
> Peter, if I understand correctly, this will go through bpf-next tree,
> but it would be great if you could take a look and confirm this
> overall is not broken. Thanks!
> 
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>> Tao Chen

Hi Andrii, Peter

It appears that the code does not require a rebase, and the latest CI 
build is valid. Looking forward to your response. Thanks.

CI has tested the following submission:
Status:     SUCCESS
Name:       [RESEND,bpf-next,v7,0/2] Pass external callchain entry to 
get_perf_callchain
Patchwork: 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1034091&state=*
Matrix:     https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/21051611369

-- 
Best Regards
Tao Chen

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-16  4:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-17  9:33 [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v7 0/2] Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
2025-12-17  9:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/2] perf: Refactor get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
2025-12-17  9:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/2] bpf: Hold the perf callchain entry until used completely Tao Chen
2025-12-23  6:29   ` Tao Chen
2026-01-06 16:00     ` Tao Chen
2026-01-09 23:47       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-16  4:35         ` Tao Chen [this message]
2026-01-23  0:38   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-23  5:42     ` Tao Chen
2026-01-23 18:40       ` Andrii Nakryiko
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-12-17  5:12 [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/2] Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
2025-12-17  5:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/2] bpf: Hold the perf callchain entry until used completely Tao Chen
2025-12-17  5:22   ` Tao Chen
2025-12-17  9:11     ` Tao Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6dbaff1f-09d3-421a-9813-c9c1cda8e7d8@linux.dev \
    --to=chen.dylane@linux.dev \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox