From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/8] perf/core: Allow multiple AUX PMU events with the same module
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 13:06:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <70a58dca-01dc-408b-a2f7-a854718a405b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240823113306.2310957-2-leo.yan@arm.com>
On 23/08/24 14:32, Leo Yan wrote:
> This commit changes the condition from checking the same PMU instance to
> checking the same .setup_aux() callback pointer. If PMU events have the
> same callback pointer, it means they share the same PMU driver module.
> This allows support for multiple PMU events with the same driver module.
>
> As a result, more than one AUX event (e.g. arm_spe_0 and arm_spe_1)
> can record trace into the AUX ring buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
> ---
> kernel/events/core.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index c973e3c11e03..883c457911a3 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -12345,9 +12345,16 @@ perf_event_set_output(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event *output_event)
>
> /*
> * If both events generate aux data, they must be on the same PMU
> + * module but can be with different PMU instances.
> + *
> + * For a built-in PMU module, the 'pmu->module' pointer is NULL,
> + * thus it is not feasible to compare the module pointers when
> + * AUX PMU drivers are built into the kernel image. Instead,
> + * comparing the .setup_aux() callback pointer can determine if
> + * the two PMU events come from the same PMU driver.
> */
> if (has_aux(event) && has_aux(output_event) &&
> - event->pmu != output_event->pmu)
> + event->pmu->setup_aux != output_event->pmu->setup_aux)
It is not very flexible and risks someone adding aux PMUs that
do not want that rule but accidentally support it. Another
option is to add a PMU callback, but really you need to Peter's
feedback.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-03 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-23 11:32 [PATCH v6 0/8] perf auxtrace: Support multiple AUX events Leo Yan
2024-08-23 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] perf/core: Allow multiple AUX PMU events with the same module Leo Yan
2024-08-23 11:40 ` Leo Yan
2024-09-03 10:06 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2024-09-04 19:35 ` Leo Yan
2024-09-05 7:13 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-08-23 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] perf auxtrace: Use evsel__is_aux_event() for checking AUX event Leo Yan
2024-08-23 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] perf auxtrace: Remove unused 'pmu' pointer from struct auxtrace_record Leo Yan
2024-08-23 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] perf auxtrace: Introduce auxtrace_record__validate_events() Leo Yan
2024-09-03 15:26 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-09-04 21:13 ` Leo Yan
2024-09-05 6:44 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-08-23 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] perf auxtrace: Refactor evlist__enable_event_idx() Leo Yan
2024-09-03 18:39 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-08-23 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] perf auxtrace: Bails out after finding the event for the map index Leo Yan
2024-09-03 18:41 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-08-23 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] perf auxtrace: Iterate all AUX events when finish reading Leo Yan
2024-08-23 11:33 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] perf arm-spe: Support multiple events in arm_spe_evsel_is_auxtrace() Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=70a58dca-01dc-408b-a2f7-a854718a405b@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).