linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com,
	atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kjain@linux.ibm.com,
	disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/4] perf check: introduce check subcommand
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 19:38:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <70a883b0-11ba-4d68-bf0d-977af60cc32e@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zn8OxjRgFlPduRKh@x1>

Hi Arnaldo,


On 29/06/24 00:58, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 11:28:14AM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 11:24:53AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>
>>> And while looking at it:
>>>
>>>               get_cpuid: [ on  ]  # HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT
>>>
>>> This looks wrong, no? Or at least confusing, have to check the source
>>> code...
>> We have this in Makefile.config
>>
>> ifndef NO_AUXTRACE
>>    ifeq ($(SRCARCH),x86)
>>      ifeq ($(feature-get_cpuid), 0)
>>        $(warning Your gcc lacks the __get_cpuid() builtin, disables support for auxtrace/Intel PT, please install a newer gcc)
>>        NO_AUXTRACE := 1
>>      endif
>>    endif
> The complete sequence is:
>
> ifndef NO_AUXTRACE
>    ifeq ($(SRCARCH),x86)
>      ifeq ($(feature-get_cpuid), 0)
>        $(warning Your gcc lacks the __get_cpuid() builtin, disables support for auxtrace/Intel PT, please install a newer gcc)
>        NO_AUXTRACE := 1
>      endif
>    endif
>    ifndef NO_AUXTRACE
>      $(call detected,CONFIG_AUXTRACE)
>      CFLAGS += -DHAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT
>      ifeq ($(feature-reallocarray), 0)
>        CFLAGS += -DCOMPAT_NEED_REALLOCARRAY
>      endif
>    endif
> endif
>
> The most descriptive would be to HAVE_GET_CPUID_SUPPORT and have it used
> in the source code.
>
> That or have:
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-check.c b/tools/perf/builtin-check.c
> index 44ffde6f8dbe51f3..ae4a686ff4f265be 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-check.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-check.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ struct feature_status supported_features[] = {
>   	FEATURE_STATUS("dwarf", HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT),
>   	FEATURE_STATUS("dwarf_getlocations", HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS_SUPPORT),
>   	FEATURE_STATUS("dwarf-unwind-support", HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT),
> -	FEATURE_STATUS("get_cpuid", HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT),
> +	FEATURE_STATUS("auxtrace", HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT),
>   	FEATURE_STATUS("libaudit", HAVE_LIBAUDIT_SUPPORT),
>   	FEATURE_STATUS("libbfd", HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT),
>   	FEATURE_STATUS("libcapstone", HAVE_LIBCAPSTONE_SUPPORT),


Looks better. Went through all instances of 'HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT', 
it's mostly been used to conditionally define perf_*_auxtrace functions.

No one seems to depend on the feature 'name' 'get_cpuid'.

Any comments ?

>
> That:
>
>          FEATURE_STATUS("dwarf-unwind-support", HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT),
>
> Should also really be:
>
>          FEATURE_STATUS("dwarf-unwind", HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT),

Will do it in v13.


Thanks,

Aditya Gupta

> For consistency, the get_cpuid/auxtrace also for consistency, I think.
>
> - Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-30 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-27 10:06 [PATCH v11 0/4] Introduce perf check subcommand Aditya Gupta
2024-06-27 10:06 ` [PATCH v11 1/4] perf check: introduce " Aditya Gupta
2024-06-28 14:12   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-06-28 14:15     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-06-28 14:20       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-06-28 14:24         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-06-28 18:28           ` Namhyung Kim
2024-06-28 19:28             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-06-30 14:08               ` Aditya Gupta [this message]
2024-07-02 21:28                 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-06-30 11:01           ` Aditya Gupta
2024-06-30 10:43         ` Aditya Gupta
2024-06-30 10:41       ` Aditya Gupta
2024-06-30 10:30     ` Aditya Gupta
2024-06-27 10:06 ` [PATCH v11 2/4] perf version: update --build-options to use 'supported_features' array Aditya Gupta
2024-06-27 10:06 ` [PATCH v11 3/4] perf tests task_analyzer: use perf check for libtraceevent support Aditya Gupta
2024-06-27 10:06 ` [PATCH v11 4/4] tools/perf/tests: Update probe_vfs_getname.sh script to use perf check feature Aditya Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=70a883b0-11ba-4d68-bf0d-977af60cc32e@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=adityag@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).