Re: [PATCH 6.6.y 0/4] perf/x86/amd: add LBR capture support outside of hardware events

[Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>]

On 2026/1/8 22:02, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 09:53:46PM +0800, Leon Hwang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2026/1/8 19:11, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 02, 2026 at 05:03:16PM +0800, Leon Hwang wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> This backport wires up AMD perfmon v2 so BPF and other software clients
>>>> can snapshot LBR stacks on demand, similar to the Intel support
>>>> upstream. The series keeps the LBR-freeze path branchless, adds the
>>>> perf_snapshot_branch_stack callback for AMD, and drops the
>>>> sampling-only restriction now that snapshots can be taken from software
>>>> contexts.
>>>>
>>>> Leon Hwang (4):
>>>>   perf/x86/amd: Ensure amd_pmu_core_disable_all() is always inlined
>>>>   perf/x86/amd: Avoid taking branches before disabling LBR
>>>>   perf/x86/amd: Support capturing LBR from software events
>>>>   perf/x86/amd: Don't reject non-sampling events with configured LBR
>>>
>>>
>>> Why is this for a stable kernel?  Isn't it a new feature?  If you need
>>> this feature, why not use a newer kernel tree?
>>>
>>
>> This series enables LBR snapshot support on AMD CPUs.
>>
>> You are right that this is not a bug fix but a feature enablement.
>> If backporting this to the stable tree is not appropriate, that is
>> totally fine. In that case, I will carry these changes in our in-house
>> stable kernel instead.
> 
> Please read:
>     https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
> 
> For what types of patches are acceptable for stable kernels.
> 
> And really, you should be moving off of 6.6.y now anyway :)
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Thanks for the pointer and the guidance. I’ll review the stable kernel
rules more carefully and adjust accordingly.

Appreciate the advice. :)

Thanks,
Leon