* [PATCH] perf script: Skip dummy event attr check @ 2022-08-31 12:40 Jiri Olsa 2022-08-31 16:02 ` Ian Rogers 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jiri Olsa @ 2022-08-31 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Hongtao Yu, Namhyung Kim, lkml, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Ian Rogers, linux-perf-users Hongtao Yu reported problem when displaying uregs in perf script for system wide perf.data: # perf script -F uregs | head -10 Samples for 'dummy:HG' event do not have UREGS attribute set. Cannot print 'uregs' field. The problem is the extra dummy event added for system wide, which does not have proper sample_type setup. Skipping attr check completely for dummy event as suggested by Namhyung, because it does not have any samples anyway. Reported-by: Hongtao Yu <hoy@fb.com> Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> --- tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c index 13580a9c50b8..304d234d8e84 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c @@ -566,6 +566,8 @@ static struct evsel *find_first_output_type(struct evlist *evlist, struct evsel *evsel; evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, evsel) { + if (evsel__is_dummy_event(evsel)) + continue; if (output_type(evsel->core.attr.type) == (int)type) return evsel; } -- 2.37.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf script: Skip dummy event attr check 2022-08-31 12:40 [PATCH] perf script: Skip dummy event attr check Jiri Olsa @ 2022-08-31 16:02 ` Ian Rogers 2022-08-31 16:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Ian Rogers @ 2022-08-31 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Hongtao Yu, Namhyung Kim, lkml, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, linux-perf-users On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:40 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote: > > Hongtao Yu reported problem when displaying uregs in perf script > for system wide perf.data: > > # perf script -F uregs | head -10 > Samples for 'dummy:HG' event do not have UREGS attribute set. Cannot print 'uregs' field. > > The problem is the extra dummy event added for system wide, > which does not have proper sample_type setup. > > Skipping attr check completely for dummy event as suggested > by Namhyung, because it does not have any samples anyway. > > Reported-by: Hongtao Yu <hoy@fb.com> > Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Thanks, Ian > --- > tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > index 13580a9c50b8..304d234d8e84 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > @@ -566,6 +566,8 @@ static struct evsel *find_first_output_type(struct evlist *evlist, > struct evsel *evsel; > > evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, evsel) { > + if (evsel__is_dummy_event(evsel)) > + continue; > if (output_type(evsel->core.attr.type) == (int)type) > return evsel; > } > -- > 2.37.2 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf script: Skip dummy event attr check 2022-08-31 16:02 ` Ian Rogers @ 2022-08-31 16:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2022-09-07 2:49 ` Xing Zhengjun 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2022-08-31 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ian Rogers Cc: Jiri Olsa, Hongtao Yu, Namhyung Kim, lkml, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, linux-perf-users Em Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 09:02:46AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:40 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > Hongtao Yu reported problem when displaying uregs in perf script > > for system wide perf.data: > > > > # perf script -F uregs | head -10 > > Samples for 'dummy:HG' event do not have UREGS attribute set. Cannot print 'uregs' field. > > > > The problem is the extra dummy event added for system wide, > > which does not have proper sample_type setup. > > > > Skipping attr check completely for dummy event as suggested > > by Namhyung, because it does not have any samples anyway. > > > > Reported-by: Hongtao Yu <hoy@fb.com> > > Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> > > Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Thanks, applied to perf/urgent. - Arnaldo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf script: Skip dummy event attr check 2022-08-31 16:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2022-09-07 2:49 ` Xing Zhengjun 2022-09-07 4:50 ` Namhyung Kim 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Xing Zhengjun @ 2022-09-07 2:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Jiri Olsa Cc: Hongtao Yu, Namhyung Kim, lkml, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, linux-perf-users, Liang, Kan Hi, On 9/1/2022 12:23 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 09:02:46AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu: >> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:40 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hongtao Yu reported problem when displaying uregs in perf script >>> for system wide perf.data: >>> >>> # perf script -F uregs | head -10 >>> Samples for 'dummy:HG' event do not have UREGS attribute set. Cannot print 'uregs' field. >>> >>> The problem is the extra dummy event added for system wide, >>> which does not have proper sample_type setup. >>> >>> Skipping attr check completely for dummy event as suggested >>> by Namhyung, because it does not have any samples anyway. >>> >>> Reported-by: Hongtao Yu <hoy@fb.com> >>> Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> >> >> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> > > Thanks, applied to perf/urgent. > > - Arnaldo I have met a similar issue on hybrid systems such as ADL, I apply the patch, and it works OK for the normal mode. # ./perf record --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.024 MB perf.data (25 samples) ] # ./perf script -F iregs |head -5 ABI:2 CX:0xffff90e19d024ed8 DX:0x1 DI:0xffff90e19d024ed8 R8:0xffffba5e437e7b30 ABI:2 CX:0x7f5239783000 DX:0x80000000 DI:0xffff90e1801eea00 R8:0x71 ABI:2 CX:0x40 DX:0x60 DI:0xffffffff9fde5ab8 R8:0x40 ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0xffffffffffffffff DI:0xffff90e1877408e8 R8:0x1 ABI:2 CX:0xcc0 DX:0x1 DI:0xffff90e187d17c60 R8:0x40 But the issue still happened when running the test in the pipe mode. In the pipe mode, it calls process_attr() which still checks the attr for the dummy event, so the issue happened. # ./perf record -o - --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true 2>/dev/null|./perf script -F iregs |head -5 Samples for 'dummy:HG' event do not have IREGS attribute set. Cannot print 'iregs' field. 0x120 [0x90]: failed to process type: 64 I have one test patch which can fix the pipe mode issue. ./perf record -o - --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true 2>/dev/null|./perf script -F iregs |head -5 ABI:2 CX:0xffff90e18119e278 DX:0x0 DI:0xffff90e18119f858 R8:0xffff90e18119e278 ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x1 DI:0xfffffa2844a91580 R8:0x402 ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x0 DI:0x100cca R8:0x0 ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x0 DI:0xffffffff9e997ca5 R8:0x0 ABI:2 CX:0x113ce8000 DX:0xffff90e198f46600 DI:0xffff90e189de8000 R8:0x290 Fixes: b91e5492f9d7 ("perf record: Add a dummy event on hybrid systems to collect metadata records") Signed-off-by: Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com> --- tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c index 9152e3e45b69..2d863cdb19fe 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c @@ -2429,6 +2429,8 @@ static int process_attr(struct perf_tool *tool, union perf_event *event, } if (evsel->core.attr.sample_type) { + if (evsel__is_dummy_event(evsel)) + return 0; err = evsel__check_attr(evsel, scr->session); if (err) return err; -- 2.25.1 -- Zhengjun Xing ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf script: Skip dummy event attr check 2022-09-07 2:49 ` Xing Zhengjun @ 2022-09-07 4:50 ` Namhyung Kim 2022-09-07 5:19 ` Xing Zhengjun 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Namhyung Kim @ 2022-09-07 4:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Xing Zhengjun Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Jiri Olsa, Hongtao Yu, lkml, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, linux-perf-users, Liang, Kan Hello, On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 7:49 PM Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 9/1/2022 12:23 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 09:02:46AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu: > >> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:40 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hongtao Yu reported problem when displaying uregs in perf script > >>> for system wide perf.data: > >>> > >>> # perf script -F uregs | head -10 > >>> Samples for 'dummy:HG' event do not have UREGS attribute set. Cannot print 'uregs' field. > >>> > >>> The problem is the extra dummy event added for system wide, > >>> which does not have proper sample_type setup. > >>> > >>> Skipping attr check completely for dummy event as suggested > >>> by Namhyung, because it does not have any samples anyway. > >>> > >>> Reported-by: Hongtao Yu <hoy@fb.com> > >>> Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> > >>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> > >> > >> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> > > > > Thanks, applied to perf/urgent. > > > > - Arnaldo > > I have met a similar issue on hybrid systems such as ADL, I apply the > patch, and it works OK for the normal mode. > # ./perf record --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e > br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.024 MB perf.data (25 samples) ] > > # ./perf script -F iregs |head -5 > ABI:2 CX:0xffff90e19d024ed8 DX:0x1 DI:0xffff90e19d024ed8 > R8:0xffffba5e437e7b30 > ABI:2 CX:0x7f5239783000 DX:0x80000000 DI:0xffff90e1801eea00 > R8:0x71 > ABI:2 CX:0x40 DX:0x60 DI:0xffffffff9fde5ab8 R8:0x40 > ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0xffffffffffffffff DI:0xffff90e1877408e8 > R8:0x1 > ABI:2 CX:0xcc0 DX:0x1 DI:0xffff90e187d17c60 R8:0x40 > > But the issue still happened when running the test in the pipe mode. In > the pipe mode, it calls process_attr() which still checks the attr for > the dummy event, so the issue happened. > > # ./perf record -o - --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e > br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true 2>/dev/null|./perf > script -F iregs |head -5 > Samples for 'dummy:HG' event do not have IREGS attribute set. Cannot > print 'iregs' field. > 0x120 [0x90]: failed to process type: 64 > > I have one test patch which can fix the pipe mode issue. > > ./perf record -o - --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e > br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true 2>/dev/null|./perf > script -F iregs |head -5 > ABI:2 CX:0xffff90e18119e278 DX:0x0 DI:0xffff90e18119f858 > R8:0xffff90e18119e278 > ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x1 DI:0xfffffa2844a91580 R8:0x402 > ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x0 DI:0x100cca R8:0x0 > ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x0 DI:0xffffffff9e997ca5 R8:0x0 > ABI:2 CX:0x113ce8000 DX:0xffff90e198f46600 > DI:0xffff90e189de8000 R8:0x290 > > > Fixes: b91e5492f9d7 ("perf record: Add a dummy event on hybrid systems > to collect metadata records") > Signed-off-by: Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com> > --- > tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > index 9152e3e45b69..2d863cdb19fe 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > @@ -2429,6 +2429,8 @@ static int process_attr(struct perf_tool *tool, > union perf_event *event, > } > > if (evsel->core.attr.sample_type) { > + if (evsel__is_dummy_event(evsel)) > + return 0; Maybe we can move this into evsel__check_attr(). Thanks, Namhyung > err = evsel__check_attr(evsel, scr->session); > if (err) > return err; > -- > 2.25.1 > > -- > Zhengjun Xing ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf script: Skip dummy event attr check 2022-09-07 4:50 ` Namhyung Kim @ 2022-09-07 5:19 ` Xing Zhengjun 2022-09-07 8:09 ` Jiri Olsa 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Xing Zhengjun @ 2022-09-07 5:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Jiri Olsa, Hongtao Yu, lkml, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, linux-perf-users, Liang, Kan On 9/7/2022 12:50 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 7:49 PM Xing Zhengjun > <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 9/1/2022 12:23 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >>> Em Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 09:02:46AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu: >>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:40 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hongtao Yu reported problem when displaying uregs in perf script >>>>> for system wide perf.data: >>>>> >>>>> # perf script -F uregs | head -10 >>>>> Samples for 'dummy:HG' event do not have UREGS attribute set. Cannot print 'uregs' field. >>>>> >>>>> The problem is the extra dummy event added for system wide, >>>>> which does not have proper sample_type setup. >>>>> >>>>> Skipping attr check completely for dummy event as suggested >>>>> by Namhyung, because it does not have any samples anyway. >>>>> >>>>> Reported-by: Hongtao Yu <hoy@fb.com> >>>>> Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> >>> >>> Thanks, applied to perf/urgent. >>> >>> - Arnaldo >> >> I have met a similar issue on hybrid systems such as ADL, I apply the >> patch, and it works OK for the normal mode. >> # ./perf record --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e >> br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true >> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] >> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.024 MB perf.data (25 samples) ] >> >> # ./perf script -F iregs |head -5 >> ABI:2 CX:0xffff90e19d024ed8 DX:0x1 DI:0xffff90e19d024ed8 >> R8:0xffffba5e437e7b30 >> ABI:2 CX:0x7f5239783000 DX:0x80000000 DI:0xffff90e1801eea00 >> R8:0x71 >> ABI:2 CX:0x40 DX:0x60 DI:0xffffffff9fde5ab8 R8:0x40 >> ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0xffffffffffffffff DI:0xffff90e1877408e8 >> R8:0x1 >> ABI:2 CX:0xcc0 DX:0x1 DI:0xffff90e187d17c60 R8:0x40 >> >> But the issue still happened when running the test in the pipe mode. In >> the pipe mode, it calls process_attr() which still checks the attr for >> the dummy event, so the issue happened. >> >> # ./perf record -o - --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e >> br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true 2>/dev/null|./perf >> script -F iregs |head -5 >> Samples for 'dummy:HG' event do not have IREGS attribute set. Cannot >> print 'iregs' field. >> 0x120 [0x90]: failed to process type: 64 >> >> I have one test patch which can fix the pipe mode issue. >> >> ./perf record -o - --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e >> br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true 2>/dev/null|./perf >> script -F iregs |head -5 >> ABI:2 CX:0xffff90e18119e278 DX:0x0 DI:0xffff90e18119f858 >> R8:0xffff90e18119e278 >> ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x1 DI:0xfffffa2844a91580 R8:0x402 >> ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x0 DI:0x100cca R8:0x0 >> ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x0 DI:0xffffffff9e997ca5 R8:0x0 >> ABI:2 CX:0x113ce8000 DX:0xffff90e198f46600 >> DI:0xffff90e189de8000 R8:0x290 >> >> >> Fixes: b91e5492f9d7 ("perf record: Add a dummy event on hybrid systems >> to collect metadata records") >> Signed-off-by: Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com> >> --- >> tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c >> index 9152e3e45b69..2d863cdb19fe 100644 >> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c >> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c >> @@ -2429,6 +2429,8 @@ static int process_attr(struct perf_tool *tool, >> union perf_event *event, >> } >> >> if (evsel->core.attr.sample_type) { >> + if (evsel__is_dummy_event(evsel)) >> + return 0; > > Maybe we can move this into evsel__check_attr(). > > Thanks, > Namhyung Yes, the following changes in evsel__check_attr() can fix both normal and pipe mode issues, Otherwise, we have to patch everywhere when evsel__check_attr() is called. diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c index 13580a9c50b8..fb76e3191858 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c @@ -451,6 +451,9 @@ static int evsel__check_attr(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_session *session) allow_user_set = perf_header__has_feat(&session->header, HEADER_AUXTRACE); + if (evsel__is_dummy_event(evsel)) + allow_user_set = true; + if (PRINT_FIELD(TRACE) && !perf_session__has_traces(session, "record -R")) return -EINVAL; -- 2.25.1 > > >> err = evsel__check_attr(evsel, scr->session); >> if (err) >> return err; >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> >> -- >> Zhengjun Xing -- Zhengjun Xing ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf script: Skip dummy event attr check 2022-09-07 5:19 ` Xing Zhengjun @ 2022-09-07 8:09 ` Jiri Olsa 2022-09-07 8:14 ` Namhyung Kim 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jiri Olsa @ 2022-09-07 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Xing Zhengjun Cc: Namhyung Kim, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Hongtao Yu, lkml, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, linux-perf-users, Liang, Kan On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 01:19:32PM +0800, Xing Zhengjun wrote: > > > On 9/7/2022 12:50 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 7:49 PM Xing Zhengjun > > <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 9/1/2022 12:23 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > Em Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 09:02:46AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu: > > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:40 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hongtao Yu reported problem when displaying uregs in perf script > > > > > > for system wide perf.data: > > > > > > > > > > > > # perf script -F uregs | head -10 > > > > > > Samples for 'dummy:HG' event do not have UREGS attribute set. Cannot print 'uregs' field. > > > > > > > > > > > > The problem is the extra dummy event added for system wide, > > > > > > which does not have proper sample_type setup. > > > > > > > > > > > > Skipping attr check completely for dummy event as suggested > > > > > > by Namhyung, because it does not have any samples anyway. > > > > > > > > > > > > Reported-by: Hongtao Yu <hoy@fb.com> > > > > > > Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> > > > > > > > > Thanks, applied to perf/urgent. > > > > > > > > - Arnaldo > > > > > > I have met a similar issue on hybrid systems such as ADL, I apply the > > > patch, and it works OK for the normal mode. > > > # ./perf record --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e > > > br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true > > > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] > > > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.024 MB perf.data (25 samples) ] > > > > > > # ./perf script -F iregs |head -5 > > > ABI:2 CX:0xffff90e19d024ed8 DX:0x1 DI:0xffff90e19d024ed8 > > > R8:0xffffba5e437e7b30 > > > ABI:2 CX:0x7f5239783000 DX:0x80000000 DI:0xffff90e1801eea00 > > > R8:0x71 > > > ABI:2 CX:0x40 DX:0x60 DI:0xffffffff9fde5ab8 R8:0x40 > > > ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0xffffffffffffffff DI:0xffff90e1877408e8 > > > R8:0x1 > > > ABI:2 CX:0xcc0 DX:0x1 DI:0xffff90e187d17c60 R8:0x40 > > > > > > But the issue still happened when running the test in the pipe mode. In > > > the pipe mode, it calls process_attr() which still checks the attr for > > > the dummy event, so the issue happened. > > > > > > # ./perf record -o - --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e > > > br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true 2>/dev/null|./perf > > > script -F iregs |head -5 > > > Samples for 'dummy:HG' event do not have IREGS attribute set. Cannot > > > print 'iregs' field. > > > 0x120 [0x90]: failed to process type: 64 > > > > > > I have one test patch which can fix the pipe mode issue. > > > > > > ./perf record -o - --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e > > > br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true 2>/dev/null|./perf > > > script -F iregs |head -5 > > > ABI:2 CX:0xffff90e18119e278 DX:0x0 DI:0xffff90e18119f858 > > > R8:0xffff90e18119e278 > > > ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x1 DI:0xfffffa2844a91580 R8:0x402 > > > ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x0 DI:0x100cca R8:0x0 > > > ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x0 DI:0xffffffff9e997ca5 R8:0x0 > > > ABI:2 CX:0x113ce8000 DX:0xffff90e198f46600 > > > DI:0xffff90e189de8000 R8:0x290 > > > > > > > > > Fixes: b91e5492f9d7 ("perf record: Add a dummy event on hybrid systems > > > to collect metadata records") > > > Signed-off-by: Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com> > > > --- > > > tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 2 ++ > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > > > index 9152e3e45b69..2d863cdb19fe 100644 > > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > > > @@ -2429,6 +2429,8 @@ static int process_attr(struct perf_tool *tool, > > > union perf_event *event, > > > } > > > > > > if (evsel->core.attr.sample_type) { > > > + if (evsel__is_dummy_event(evsel)) > > > + return 0; > > > > Maybe we can move this into evsel__check_attr(). > > > > Thanks, > > Namhyung > > Yes, the following changes in evsel__check_attr() can fix both normal and > pipe mode issues, Otherwise, we have to patch everywhere when > evsel__check_attr() is called. > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > index 13580a9c50b8..fb76e3191858 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > @@ -451,6 +451,9 @@ static int evsel__check_attr(struct evsel *evsel, struct > perf_session *session) > allow_user_set = perf_header__has_feat(&session->header, > HEADER_AUXTRACE); > > + if (evsel__is_dummy_event(evsel)) > + allow_user_set = true; > + hm, do you need to pass allow_user_set to UREGS check then? jirka --- diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c index 13580a9c50b8..30c9cbdee98d 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c @@ -451,6 +451,9 @@ static int evsel__check_attr(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_session *session) allow_user_set = perf_header__has_feat(&session->header, HEADER_AUXTRACE); + if (evsel__is_dummy_event(evsel)) + allow_user_set = true; + if (PRINT_FIELD(TRACE) && !perf_session__has_traces(session, "record -R")) return -EINVAL; @@ -517,7 +520,7 @@ static int evsel__check_attr(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_session *session) return -EINVAL; if (PRINT_FIELD(UREGS) && - evsel__check_stype(evsel, PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER, "UREGS", PERF_OUTPUT_UREGS)) + evsel__do_check_stype(evsel, PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER, "UREGS", PERF_OUTPUT_UREGS, allow_user_set)) return -EINVAL; if (PRINT_FIELD(PHYS_ADDR) && ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf script: Skip dummy event attr check 2022-09-07 8:09 ` Jiri Olsa @ 2022-09-07 8:14 ` Namhyung Kim 2022-09-07 14:16 ` Jiri Olsa 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Namhyung Kim @ 2022-09-07 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Xing Zhengjun, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Hongtao Yu, lkml, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, linux-perf-users, Liang, Kan On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 1:09 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 01:19:32PM +0800, Xing Zhengjun wrote: > > > > > > On 9/7/2022 12:50 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 7:49 PM Xing Zhengjun > > > <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On 9/1/2022 12:23 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > > Em Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 09:02:46AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu: > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:40 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hongtao Yu reported problem when displaying uregs in perf script > > > > > > > for system wide perf.data: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > # perf script -F uregs | head -10 > > > > > > > Samples for 'dummy:HG' event do not have UREGS attribute set. Cannot print 'uregs' field. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The problem is the extra dummy event added for system wide, > > > > > > > which does not have proper sample_type setup. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Skipping attr check completely for dummy event as suggested > > > > > > > by Namhyung, because it does not have any samples anyway. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Reported-by: Hongtao Yu <hoy@fb.com> > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, applied to perf/urgent. > > > > > > > > > > - Arnaldo > > > > > > > > I have met a similar issue on hybrid systems such as ADL, I apply the > > > > patch, and it works OK for the normal mode. > > > > # ./perf record --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e > > > > br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true > > > > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] > > > > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.024 MB perf.data (25 samples) ] > > > > > > > > # ./perf script -F iregs |head -5 > > > > ABI:2 CX:0xffff90e19d024ed8 DX:0x1 DI:0xffff90e19d024ed8 > > > > R8:0xffffba5e437e7b30 > > > > ABI:2 CX:0x7f5239783000 DX:0x80000000 DI:0xffff90e1801eea00 > > > > R8:0x71 > > > > ABI:2 CX:0x40 DX:0x60 DI:0xffffffff9fde5ab8 R8:0x40 > > > > ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0xffffffffffffffff DI:0xffff90e1877408e8 > > > > R8:0x1 > > > > ABI:2 CX:0xcc0 DX:0x1 DI:0xffff90e187d17c60 R8:0x40 > > > > > > > > But the issue still happened when running the test in the pipe mode. In > > > > the pipe mode, it calls process_attr() which still checks the attr for > > > > the dummy event, so the issue happened. > > > > > > > > # ./perf record -o - --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e > > > > br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true 2>/dev/null|./perf > > > > script -F iregs |head -5 > > > > Samples for 'dummy:HG' event do not have IREGS attribute set. Cannot > > > > print 'iregs' field. > > > > 0x120 [0x90]: failed to process type: 64 > > > > > > > > I have one test patch which can fix the pipe mode issue. > > > > > > > > ./perf record -o - --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e > > > > br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true 2>/dev/null|./perf > > > > script -F iregs |head -5 > > > > ABI:2 CX:0xffff90e18119e278 DX:0x0 DI:0xffff90e18119f858 > > > > R8:0xffff90e18119e278 > > > > ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x1 DI:0xfffffa2844a91580 R8:0x402 > > > > ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x0 DI:0x100cca R8:0x0 > > > > ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x0 DI:0xffffffff9e997ca5 R8:0x0 > > > > ABI:2 CX:0x113ce8000 DX:0xffff90e198f46600 > > > > DI:0xffff90e189de8000 R8:0x290 > > > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: b91e5492f9d7 ("perf record: Add a dummy event on hybrid systems > > > > to collect metadata records") > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com> > > > > --- > > > > tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 2 ++ > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > > > > index 9152e3e45b69..2d863cdb19fe 100644 > > > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > > > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > > > > @@ -2429,6 +2429,8 @@ static int process_attr(struct perf_tool *tool, > > > > union perf_event *event, > > > > } > > > > > > > > if (evsel->core.attr.sample_type) { > > > > + if (evsel__is_dummy_event(evsel)) > > > > + return 0; > > > > > > Maybe we can move this into evsel__check_attr(). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Namhyung > > > > Yes, the following changes in evsel__check_attr() can fix both normal and > > pipe mode issues, Otherwise, we have to patch everywhere when > > evsel__check_attr() is called. > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > > index 13580a9c50b8..fb76e3191858 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > > @@ -451,6 +451,9 @@ static int evsel__check_attr(struct evsel *evsel, struct > > perf_session *session) > > allow_user_set = perf_header__has_feat(&session->header, > > HEADER_AUXTRACE); > > > > + if (evsel__is_dummy_event(evsel)) > > + allow_user_set = true; > > + > > hm, do you need to pass allow_user_set to UREGS check then? Well.. actually I thought we can simply return 0 for a dummy event. Thanks, Namhyung ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf script: Skip dummy event attr check 2022-09-07 8:14 ` Namhyung Kim @ 2022-09-07 14:16 ` Jiri Olsa 2022-09-08 6:56 ` Xing Zhengjun 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jiri Olsa @ 2022-09-07 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Jiri Olsa, Xing Zhengjun, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Hongtao Yu, lkml, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, linux-perf-users, Liang, Kan On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 01:14:52AM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 1:09 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 01:19:32PM +0800, Xing Zhengjun wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 9/7/2022 12:50 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 7:49 PM Xing Zhengjun > > > > <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > On 9/1/2022 12:23 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > > > Em Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 09:02:46AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu: > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:40 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hongtao Yu reported problem when displaying uregs in perf script > > > > > > > > for system wide perf.data: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > # perf script -F uregs | head -10 > > > > > > > > Samples for 'dummy:HG' event do not have UREGS attribute set. Cannot print 'uregs' field. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The problem is the extra dummy event added for system wide, > > > > > > > > which does not have proper sample_type setup. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Skipping attr check completely for dummy event as suggested > > > > > > > > by Namhyung, because it does not have any samples anyway. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Reported-by: Hongtao Yu <hoy@fb.com> > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, applied to perf/urgent. > > > > > > > > > > > > - Arnaldo > > > > > > > > > > I have met a similar issue on hybrid systems such as ADL, I apply the > > > > > patch, and it works OK for the normal mode. > > > > > # ./perf record --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e > > > > > br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true > > > > > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] > > > > > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.024 MB perf.data (25 samples) ] > > > > > > > > > > # ./perf script -F iregs |head -5 > > > > > ABI:2 CX:0xffff90e19d024ed8 DX:0x1 DI:0xffff90e19d024ed8 > > > > > R8:0xffffba5e437e7b30 > > > > > ABI:2 CX:0x7f5239783000 DX:0x80000000 DI:0xffff90e1801eea00 > > > > > R8:0x71 > > > > > ABI:2 CX:0x40 DX:0x60 DI:0xffffffff9fde5ab8 R8:0x40 > > > > > ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0xffffffffffffffff DI:0xffff90e1877408e8 > > > > > R8:0x1 > > > > > ABI:2 CX:0xcc0 DX:0x1 DI:0xffff90e187d17c60 R8:0x40 > > > > > > > > > > But the issue still happened when running the test in the pipe mode. In > > > > > the pipe mode, it calls process_attr() which still checks the attr for > > > > > the dummy event, so the issue happened. > > > > > > > > > > # ./perf record -o - --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e > > > > > br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true 2>/dev/null|./perf > > > > > script -F iregs |head -5 > > > > > Samples for 'dummy:HG' event do not have IREGS attribute set. Cannot > > > > > print 'iregs' field. > > > > > 0x120 [0x90]: failed to process type: 64 > > > > > > > > > > I have one test patch which can fix the pipe mode issue. > > > > > > > > > > ./perf record -o - --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e > > > > > br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true 2>/dev/null|./perf > > > > > script -F iregs |head -5 > > > > > ABI:2 CX:0xffff90e18119e278 DX:0x0 DI:0xffff90e18119f858 > > > > > R8:0xffff90e18119e278 > > > > > ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x1 DI:0xfffffa2844a91580 R8:0x402 > > > > > ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x0 DI:0x100cca R8:0x0 > > > > > ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x0 DI:0xffffffff9e997ca5 R8:0x0 > > > > > ABI:2 CX:0x113ce8000 DX:0xffff90e198f46600 > > > > > DI:0xffff90e189de8000 R8:0x290 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: b91e5492f9d7 ("perf record: Add a dummy event on hybrid systems > > > > > to collect metadata records") > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 2 ++ > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > > > > > index 9152e3e45b69..2d863cdb19fe 100644 > > > > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > > > > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > > > > > @@ -2429,6 +2429,8 @@ static int process_attr(struct perf_tool *tool, > > > > > union perf_event *event, > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > if (evsel->core.attr.sample_type) { > > > > > + if (evsel__is_dummy_event(evsel)) > > > > > + return 0; > > > > > > > > Maybe we can move this into evsel__check_attr(). > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Namhyung > > > > > > Yes, the following changes in evsel__check_attr() can fix both normal and > > > pipe mode issues, Otherwise, we have to patch everywhere when > > > evsel__check_attr() is called. > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > > > index 13580a9c50b8..fb76e3191858 100644 > > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > > > @@ -451,6 +451,9 @@ static int evsel__check_attr(struct evsel *evsel, struct > > > perf_session *session) > > > allow_user_set = perf_header__has_feat(&session->header, > > > HEADER_AUXTRACE); > > > > > > + if (evsel__is_dummy_event(evsel)) > > > + allow_user_set = true; > > > + > > > > hm, do you need to pass allow_user_set to UREGS check then? > > Well.. actually I thought we can simply return 0 for a dummy event. true :-) jirka ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf script: Skip dummy event attr check 2022-09-07 14:16 ` Jiri Olsa @ 2022-09-08 6:56 ` Xing Zhengjun 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Xing Zhengjun @ 2022-09-08 6:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Ian Rogers, Hongtao Yu, lkml, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, linux-perf-users, Liang, Kan On 9/7/2022 10:16 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 01:14:52AM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 1:09 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 01:19:32PM +0800, Xing Zhengjun wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9/7/2022 12:50 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 7:49 PM Xing Zhengjun >>>>> <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> On 9/1/2022 12:23 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >>>>>>> Em Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 09:02:46AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu: >>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:40 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hongtao Yu reported problem when displaying uregs in perf script >>>>>>>>> for system wide perf.data: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> # perf script -F uregs | head -10 >>>>>>>>> Samples for 'dummy:HG' event do not have UREGS attribute set. Cannot print 'uregs' field. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The problem is the extra dummy event added for system wide, >>>>>>>>> which does not have proper sample_type setup. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Skipping attr check completely for dummy event as suggested >>>>>>>>> by Namhyung, because it does not have any samples anyway. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Reported-by: Hongtao Yu <hoy@fb.com> >>>>>>>>> Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, applied to perf/urgent. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Arnaldo >>>>>> >>>>>> I have met a similar issue on hybrid systems such as ADL, I apply the >>>>>> patch, and it works OK for the normal mode. >>>>>> # ./perf record --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e >>>>>> br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true >>>>>> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] >>>>>> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.024 MB perf.data (25 samples) ] >>>>>> >>>>>> # ./perf script -F iregs |head -5 >>>>>> ABI:2 CX:0xffff90e19d024ed8 DX:0x1 DI:0xffff90e19d024ed8 >>>>>> R8:0xffffba5e437e7b30 >>>>>> ABI:2 CX:0x7f5239783000 DX:0x80000000 DI:0xffff90e1801eea00 >>>>>> R8:0x71 >>>>>> ABI:2 CX:0x40 DX:0x60 DI:0xffffffff9fde5ab8 R8:0x40 >>>>>> ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0xffffffffffffffff DI:0xffff90e1877408e8 >>>>>> R8:0x1 >>>>>> ABI:2 CX:0xcc0 DX:0x1 DI:0xffff90e187d17c60 R8:0x40 >>>>>> >>>>>> But the issue still happened when running the test in the pipe mode. In >>>>>> the pipe mode, it calls process_attr() which still checks the attr for >>>>>> the dummy event, so the issue happened. >>>>>> >>>>>> # ./perf record -o - --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e >>>>>> br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true 2>/dev/null|./perf >>>>>> script -F iregs |head -5 >>>>>> Samples for 'dummy:HG' event do not have IREGS attribute set. Cannot >>>>>> print 'iregs' field. >>>>>> 0x120 [0x90]: failed to process type: 64 >>>>>> >>>>>> I have one test patch which can fix the pipe mode issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> ./perf record -o - --intr-regs=di,r8,dx,cx -e >>>>>> br_inst_retired.near_call:p -c 1000 --per-thread true 2>/dev/null|./perf >>>>>> script -F iregs |head -5 >>>>>> ABI:2 CX:0xffff90e18119e278 DX:0x0 DI:0xffff90e18119f858 >>>>>> R8:0xffff90e18119e278 >>>>>> ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x1 DI:0xfffffa2844a91580 R8:0x402 >>>>>> ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x0 DI:0x100cca R8:0x0 >>>>>> ABI:2 CX:0x0 DX:0x0 DI:0xffffffff9e997ca5 R8:0x0 >>>>>> ABI:2 CX:0x113ce8000 DX:0xffff90e198f46600 >>>>>> DI:0xffff90e189de8000 R8:0x290 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Fixes: b91e5492f9d7 ("perf record: Add a dummy event on hybrid systems >>>>>> to collect metadata records") >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 2 ++ >>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c >>>>>> index 9152e3e45b69..2d863cdb19fe 100644 >>>>>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c >>>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c >>>>>> @@ -2429,6 +2429,8 @@ static int process_attr(struct perf_tool *tool, >>>>>> union perf_event *event, >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> if (evsel->core.attr.sample_type) { >>>>>> + if (evsel__is_dummy_event(evsel)) >>>>>> + return 0; >>>>> >>>>> Maybe we can move this into evsel__check_attr(). >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Namhyung >>>> >>>> Yes, the following changes in evsel__check_attr() can fix both normal and >>>> pipe mode issues, Otherwise, we have to patch everywhere when >>>> evsel__check_attr() is called. >>>> >>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c >>>> index 13580a9c50b8..fb76e3191858 100644 >>>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c >>>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c >>>> @@ -451,6 +451,9 @@ static int evsel__check_attr(struct evsel *evsel, struct >>>> perf_session *session) >>>> allow_user_set = perf_header__has_feat(&session->header, >>>> HEADER_AUXTRACE); >>>> >>>> + if (evsel__is_dummy_event(evsel)) >>>> + allow_user_set = true; >>>> + >>> >>> hm, do you need to pass allow_user_set to UREGS check then? >> >> Well.. actually I thought we can simply return 0 for a dummy event. > > true :-) > > jirka Thanks all, I will post a patch based on it soon. -- Zhengjun Xing ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-08 6:56 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-08-31 12:40 [PATCH] perf script: Skip dummy event attr check Jiri Olsa 2022-08-31 16:02 ` Ian Rogers 2022-08-31 16:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2022-09-07 2:49 ` Xing Zhengjun 2022-09-07 4:50 ` Namhyung Kim 2022-09-07 5:19 ` Xing Zhengjun 2022-09-07 8:09 ` Jiri Olsa 2022-09-07 8:14 ` Namhyung Kim 2022-09-07 14:16 ` Jiri Olsa 2022-09-08 6:56 ` Xing Zhengjun
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).