linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Perf Users <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: symbol addresses are wrong when kcore is used
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:54:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ab497c9-7b56-1fa2-2c7d-98f2199df993@gmail.com> (raw)

Hi guys:

I have been meaning to ask about this for 2 years now: perf script shows the wrong addresses when /proc/kcore is referenced. Here's an example with perf from net-next tree (4.9-rc3):

$ perf record -a -g -e fib6:* -- sleep 5

$ perf script
vhost-7489  7491 [018]  2314.004488: fib6:fib6_table_lookup: table 255 oif 0 iif 4 src 2100:1::3 dst ff02::1:ff00:64 tos 0 scope 0 flags 0 ==> dev br1 gw ::
            7fff8155f49e ip6_pol_route+0x80007f00249e ([kernel.kallsyms])
            7fff8155f77a ip6_pol_route_input+0x80007f00201a ([kernel.kallsyms])
            7fff81588515 fib6_rule_action+0x80007f0020c5 ([kernel.kallsyms])
            7fff814c2676 fib_rules_lookup+0x80007f002116 ([kernel.kallsyms])
            7fff815886b9 fib6_rule_lookup+0x80007f002059 ([kernel.kallsyms])
            7fff8155c77e ip6_route_input_lookup+0x80007f00204e ([kernel.kallsyms])
            7fff81560a98 ip6_route_input+0x80007f0020d8 ([kernel.kallsyms])
            7fff81550a92 ip6_rcv_finish+0x80007f002082 ([kernel.kallsyms])
            7fff81551344 ipv6_rcv+0x80007f002334 ([kernel.kallsyms])

The 7fff addresses are completely wrong. If I compile perf and disable use of kcore:

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
index aecff69a510d..0debd7e96aa2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ int __dso__load_kallsyms(struct dso *dso, const char *filename,
 int dso__load_kallsyms(struct dso *dso, const char *filename,
                       struct map *map)
 {
-       return __dso__load_kallsyms(dso, filename, map, false);
+       return __dso__load_kallsyms(dso, filename, map, true);
 }

 static int dso__load_perf_map(struct dso *dso, struct map *map)


Then the addresses are correct:

vhost-7489  7491 [018]  2314.004488: fib6:fib6_table_lookup: table 255 oif 0 iif 4 src 2100:1::3 dst ff02::1:ff00:64 tos 0 scope 0 flags 0 ==> dev br1 gw ::
        ffffffff8155d49e ip6_pol_route+0x49e ([kernel.kallsyms])
        ffffffff8155d77a ip6_pol_route_input+0x1a ([kernel.kallsyms])
        ffffffff81586515 fib6_rule_action+0xc5 ([kernel.kallsyms])
        ffffffff814c0676 fib_rules_lookup+0x116 ([kernel.kallsyms])
        ffffffff815866b9 fib6_rule_lookup+0x59 ([kernel.kallsyms])
        ffffffff8155a77e ip6_route_input_lookup+0x4e ([kernel.kallsyms])
        ffffffff8155ea98 ip6_route_input+0xd8 ([kernel.kallsyms])
        ffffffff8154ea92 ip6_rcv_finish+0x82 ([kernel.kallsyms])
        ffffffff8154f344 ipv6_rcv+0x334 ([kernel.kallsyms])


Or if I cat kallsyms into a file and pass it to perf it works:

$ cat /proc/kallsyms > /tmp/kallsyms
$ perf script --kallsyms /tmp/kallsyms

vhost-7489  7491 [018]  2314.004488: fib6:fib6_table_lookup: table 255 oif 0 iif 4 src 2100:1::3 dst ff02::1:ff00:64 tos 0 scope 0 flags 0 ==> dev br1 gw ::
        ffffffff8155d49e ip6_pol_route+0x49e ([kernel.kallsyms])
        ffffffff8155d77a ip6_pol_route_input+0x1a ([kernel.kallsyms])
        ffffffff81586515 fib6_rule_action+0xc5 ([kernel.kallsyms])
        ffffffff814c0676 fib_rules_lookup+0x116 ([kernel.kallsyms])
        ffffffff815866b9 fib6_rule_lookup+0x59 ([kernel.kallsyms])
        ffffffff8155a77e ip6_route_input_lookup+0x4e ([kernel.kallsyms])
        ffffffff8155ea98 ip6_route_input+0xd8 ([kernel.kallsyms])
        ffffffff8154ea92 ip6_rcv_finish+0x82 ([kernel.kallsyms])
        ffffffff8154f344 ipv6_rcv+0x334 ([kernel.kallsyms])

So there is something fundamentally wrong with the use of /proc/kcore.

Adrian: I seem to recall you added support for kcore. Any ideas on why the addresses are wrong?

David

             reply	other threads:[~2016-11-08 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-08 16:54 David Ahern [this message]
2016-11-09  9:44 ` symbol addresses are wrong when kcore is used Adrian Hunter
2016-11-29 16:08   ` David Ahern
2016-11-29 16:20     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7ab497c9-7b56-1fa2-2c7d-98f2199df993@gmail.com \
    --to=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).