From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Krister Johansen <kjlx@templeofstupid.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>,
David Reaver <me@davidreaver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf/util: Symbol lookup with kcore can fail if multiple segments match stext
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 15:29:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b5f872a-f52e-7129-e956-90e97ec7d911@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230125183418.GD1963@templeofstupid.com>
On 25/01/23 20:34, Krister Johansen wrote:
> This problem was encountered on an arm64 system with a lot of memory.
> Without kernel debug symbols installed, and with both kcore and kallsyms
> available, perf managed to get confused and returned "unknown" for all
> of the kernel symbols that it tried to look up.
>
> On this system, stext fell within the vmalloc segment. The kcore symbol
> matching code tries to find the first segment that contains stext and
> uses that to replace the segment generated from just the kallsyms
> information. In this case, however, there were two: a very large
> vmalloc segment, and the text segment. This caused perf to get confused
> because multiple overlapping segments were inserted into the RB tree
> that holds the discovered segments. However, that alone wasn't
> sufficient to cause the problem. Even when we could find the segment,
> the offsets were adjusted in such a way that the newly generated symbols
> didn't line up with the instruction addresses in the trace. The most
> obvious solution would be to consult which segment type is text from
> kcore, but this information is not exposed to users.
>
> Instead, select the smallest matching segment that contains stext
> instead of the first matching segment. This allows us to match the text
> segment instead of vmalloc, if one is contained within the other.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krister Johansen <kjlx@templeofstupid.com>
Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Correct whitespace, add comments, and fix-up subject. (Feedback from Adrian
> Hunter)
> ---
> tools/perf/util/symbol.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
> index a3a165ae933a..98014f937568 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
> @@ -1368,10 +1368,23 @@ static int dso__load_kcore(struct dso *dso, struct map *map,
>
> /* Find the kernel map using the '_stext' symbol */
> if (!kallsyms__get_function_start(kallsyms_filename, "_stext", &stext)) {
> + u64 replacement_size = 0;
> +
> list_for_each_entry(new_map, &md.maps, node) {
> - if (stext >= new_map->start && stext < new_map->end) {
> + u64 new_size = new_map->end - new_map->start;
> +
> + if (!(stext >= new_map->start && stext < new_map->end))
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * On some architectures, ARM64 for example, the kernel
> + * text can get allocated inside of the vmalloc segment.
> + * Select the smallest matching segment, in case stext
> + * falls within more than one in the list.
> + */
> + if (!replacement_map || new_size < replacement_size) {
> replacement_map = new_map;
> - break;
> + replacement_size = new_size;
> }
> }
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-30 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-24 22:35 [PATCH] perf/util: Symbol lookup can fail if multiple segmets match stext Krister Johansen
2023-01-25 7:29 ` Adrian Hunter
2023-01-25 7:37 ` Adrian Hunter
2023-01-25 18:32 ` Krister Johansen
2023-01-25 18:34 ` [PATCH v2] perf/util: Symbol lookup with kcore can fail if multiple segments " Krister Johansen
2023-01-30 13:29 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2023-02-02 1:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-20 17:16 ` Krister Johansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b5f872a-f52e-7129-e956-90e97ec7d911@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kjlx@templeofstupid.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=me@davidreaver.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).