[Question] perf ftrace: regarding thread ID

[Question] perf ftrace: regarding thread ID

[Taeung Song]

Hi, Namhyung :)

I saw new 'ftrace' tool that was applied yesterday.
If running perf ftrace as below..

1) current tracer : function_graph

   # perf ftrace -t function_graph /usr/toybox/bin/usleep 123456 | head -5
  2)   0.171 us    |  finish_task_switch();
  2)   0.070 us    |  finish_wait();
  2)               |  mutex_lock() {
  2)   0.035 us    |    _cond_resched();
  2)   0.423 us    |  }


2) current tracer : function

   # perf ftrace -t function /usr/toybox/bin/usleep 123456 | head -5
            <...>-24384 [002] d... 14170.310700: finish_task_switch 
<-__schedule
            <...>-24384 [002] .... 14170.310701: finish_wait <-pipe_wait
            <...>-24384 [002] .... 14170.310702: mutex_lock <-pipe_wait
            <...>-24384 [002] .... 14170.310702: _cond_resched <-mutex_lock
            <...>-24384 [002] .... 14170.310702: 
generic_pipe_buf_confirm <-pipe_read


If tracer is 'function', we can see tids.
But if tracer is 'function_graph', they aren't appeared.

So, I think tids should be printed both 'function' and 'function_graph' 
like below.
(such as uftrace :) )

   # perf ftrace -t function_graph /usr/toybox/bin/usleep 123456 | head -5
  2)   0.171 us [24384] |  finish_task_switch();
  2)   0.070 us [24384] |  finish_wait();
  2)                    |  mutex_lock() {
  2)   0.035 us [24384] |    _cond_resched();
  2)   0.423 us [24384] |  }

What do you think about this ?
How about this ?


Thanks,
Taeung