From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Zaid Al-Bassam <zalbassam@google.com>
Cc: Jesus Sanchez-Palencia <jesussanp@google.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] perf: pmuv3: Add common defines for the PMU version
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2023 11:20:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86mt5oz9n3.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230126204444.2204061-4-zalbassam@google.com>
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 20:44:39 +0000,
Zaid Al-Bassam <zalbassam@google.com> wrote:
>
> The current PMU version defines are available for arm64 only,
> As we want to add PMUv3 support to arm (32-bit), this patch makes
> these defines available for both arm/arm64 by defining them in
> the common arm_pmuv3.h header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zaid Al-Bassam <zalbassam@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c | 8 ++++----
> include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c
> index 94e4098b662d..505f0758260c 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c
> @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group armv8_pmuv3_caps_attr_group = {
> */
> static bool armv8pmu_has_long_event(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
> {
> - return (cpu_pmu->pmuver >= ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_V3P5);
> + return (cpu_pmu->pmuver >= ARMV8_PMU_DFR_VER_V3P5);
This doesn't really makes any sense. As per the architecture spec,
PMUv3p5 on AArch32 cannot expose the top 32 bits (DDI0487I.a, G8.4.10
"PMEVCNTR<n>, Performance Monitors Event Count Registers, n = 0 -
30"):
<quote>
There is no means to access bits [63:32] directly from AArch32 state.
</quote>
So on AArch32, this should always return false, no ifs, no buts.
Also, turning the architectural symbols (ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_*) into
custom stuff is a total non-starter. We generate these names and want
to use them everywhere.
Either you abstract them in the architecture specific headers, or you
define the AArch64 name in the AArch32 code.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-08 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-26 20:44 [PATCH 0/8] perf: arm: Make PMUv3 driver available for aarch32 Zaid Al-Bassam
2023-01-26 20:44 ` [PATCH 1/8] arm64: perf: Move PMUv3 driver to drivers/perf Zaid Al-Bassam
2023-01-26 20:44 ` [PATCH 2/8] arm64: perf: Abstract system register accesses away Zaid Al-Bassam
2023-01-26 20:44 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf: pmuv3: Add common defines for the PMU version Zaid Al-Bassam
2023-02-08 11:20 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-01-26 20:44 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf: pmuv3: Add wrappers for KVM accesses Zaid Al-Bassam
2023-02-08 11:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-26 20:44 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf: pmuv3: Change GENMASK to GENMASK_ULL Zaid Al-Bassam
2023-02-08 11:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-26 20:44 ` [PATCH 6/8] ARM: Make CONFIG_CPU_V7 valid for 32bit ARMv8 implementations Zaid Al-Bassam
2023-01-26 20:44 ` [PATCH 7/8] ARM: perf: Allow the use of the PMUv3 driver on 32bit ARM Zaid Al-Bassam
2023-02-08 12:51 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-26 20:44 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: mach-virt: Select PMUv3 driver by default Zaid Al-Bassam
2023-02-08 16:40 ` [PATCH 0/8] perf: arm: Make PMUv3 driver available for aarch32 Marc Zyngier
2023-02-09 0:15 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-02-10 16:58 ` Zaid Al-Bassam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86mt5oz9n3.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jesussanp@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zalbassam@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).