linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Xie Yuanbin <qq570070308@gmail.com>,
	peterz@infradead.org, riel@surriel.com,
	segher@kernel.crashing.org, david@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	arnd@arndb.de, acme@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	agordeev@linux.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alex@ghiti.fr,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, andreas@gaisler.com,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
	borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, bp@alien8.de, bsegall@google.com,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, frederic@kernel.org, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	hca@linux.ibm.com, irogers@google.com, james.clark@linaro.org,
	jolsa@kernel.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, justinstitt@google.com,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, luto@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	max.kellermann@ionos.com, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	morbo@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org, nathan@kernel.org,
	nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com, nysal@linux.ibm.com,
	palmer@dabbelt.com, paulmck@kernel.org, pjw@kernel.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com,
	thuth@redhat.com, urezki@gmail.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	vschneid@redhat.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 16:42:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87345beoq2.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251214190907.184793-2-qq570070308@gmail.com>

On Mon, Dec 15 2025 at 03:09, Xie Yuanbin wrote:
> enter_lazy_tlb() on x86 is short enough, and is called in context
> switching, which is the hot code path.
>
> Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86 to optimize performance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xie Yuanbin <qq570070308@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511091959.kfmo9kPB-lkp@intel.com/
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511092219.73aMMES4-lkp@intel.com/
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511100042.ZklpqjOY-lkp@intel.com/

These Reported-by and Closes tags are just wrong. This is a new patch
and the robot reported failures against earlier versions. The robot
report is very clear about that:

  "If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
   the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
     Reported-by:...
     Closes:..."

No?

> +/*
> + * Please ignore the name of this function.  It should be called
> + * switch_to_kernel_thread().

And why is it not renamed then?

> + *
> + * enter_lazy_tlb() is a hint from the scheduler that we are entering a

We enter a kernel thread? AFAIK the metaverse has been canceled.

> + * kernel thread or other context without an mm.  Acceptable implementations
> + * include doing nothing whatsoever, switching to init_mm, or various clever
> + * lazy tricks to try to minimize TLB flushes.
> + *
> + * The scheduler reserves the right to call enter_lazy_tlb() several times
> + * in a row.  It will notify us that we're going back to a real mm by

It will notify us by sending email or what?

> + * calling switch_mm_irqs_off().
> + */
>  #define enter_lazy_tlb enter_lazy_tlb
> -extern void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk);
> +#ifndef MODULE
> +static __always_inline void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> +	if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) == &init_mm)
> +		return;
> +
> +	this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate_shared.is_lazy, true);
> +}

Please move the '#define enter_....' under the inline function. That's
way simpler to read.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-15 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-14 19:09 [PATCH v5 0/3] Optimize code generation during context switching Xie Yuanbin
2025-12-14 19:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] x86/mm/tlb: Make enter_lazy_tlb() always inline on x86 Xie Yuanbin
2025-12-15 15:42   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-12-16 15:49     ` Xie Yuanbin
2025-12-14 19:09 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] sched: Make raw_spin_rq_unlock() inline Xie Yuanbin
2025-12-14 23:39   ` Rik van Riel
2025-12-14 19:13 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] sched/core: Make finish_task_switch() and its subfunctions always inline Xie Yuanbin
2025-12-15 13:10 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Optimize code generation during context switching Xie Yuanbin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87345beoq2.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=max.kellermann@ionos.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=nysal@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=qq570070308@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).