From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf record: Use an eventfd to wakeup when done Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 06:34:56 -0700 Message-ID: <87a71y93lr.fsf@linux.intel.com> References: <20200508145624.1.I4d7421c6bbb1f83ea58419082481082e19097841@changeid> <20200513122012.v3.1.I4d7421c6bbb1f83ea58419082481082e19097841@changeid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20200513122012.v3.1.I4d7421c6bbb1f83ea58419082481082e19097841@changeid> (Anand K. Mistry's message of "Wed, 13 May 2020 12:20:23 +1000") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Anand K Mistry Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Shishkin , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , Mark Rutland , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org Anand K Mistry writes: > } > > + done_fd = eventfd(0, EFD_NONBLOCK); This will make perf depend on a recent glibc or other library that implements eventfd. Wouldn't surprise me if some kind of build time check is needed for this to pass all of Arnaldo's built tests. -Andi