Re: [PATCH v2] perf: Avoid implicit function declarations in lexer/parse interface

[Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>]

* Florian Weimer:

> * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
>
>>> Thanks, applied. BTW b4 coulnd't find this message (nor the original):
>
> Yes, vger drops the message after accepting it for some reason, probably
> something in the patch contents.  I tried to resubmit from a completely
> separate account, no luck.
>
>> Not so fast, removed it for now:
>>
>>   CC      /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/parse-events-bison.o
>> In file included from util/pmu.y:14:
>> /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/pmu-flex.h:496:1: error: unknown type name ‘YYSTYPE’
>>   496 |
>>       | ^
>> /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/pmu-flex.h:498:19: error: unknown type name ‘YYSTYPE’
>>   498 |
>>       |                   ^
>> /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/pmu-flex.h:546:17: error: unknown type name ‘YYSTYPE’
>>   546 | extern int yylex \
>>       |                 ^~
>> util/pmu-bison.c: In function ‘perf_pmu_parse’:
>> /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/util/pmu-bison.c:69:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘perf_pmu_lex’; did you mean ‘perf_pmu_free’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>    69 | #define yylex           perf_pmu_lex
>>       |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>> util/pmu-bison.c:1007:16: note: in expansion of macro ‘yylex’
>
> This appears to be related to some BPF filter stuff that is only in
> perf-next, not mainline.
>
> Is this the right tree on which to base the patch?
>
>   <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/>
>
> Branch perf-tools-next?

Sorry, it doesn't build even without my patch:

make[4]: *** No rule to make target 'zip.h', needed by '/tmp/build/libbpf/staticobjs/libbpf.o'.  Stop.

Thanks,
Florian