linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: duchangbin <changbin.du@huawei.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: duchangbin <changbin.du@huawei.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, "Ian Rogers" <irogers@google.com>,
	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	"linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"llvm@lists.linux.dev" <llvm@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] perf: support specify vdso path in cmdline
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 02:32:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <88e192fb4b82454bbb008b65be94ffae@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18d0ae92-d764-4151-a2d6-f017b22b4c92@intel.com>

On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 08:27:55PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 28/06/24 07:21, duchangbin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 04:53:18PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >> Hello guys,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 01:32:42PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> >>> On 26/06/24 05:26, duchangbin wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 04:20:49PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> >>>>> On 25/06/24 06:37, Changbin Du wrote:
> >>>>>> The vdso dumped from process memory (in buildid-cache) lacks debugging
> >>>>>> info. To annotate vdso symbols with source lines we need specify a
> >>>>>> debugging version.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For x86, we can find them from your local build as
> >>>>>> arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso{32,64}.so.dbg. Or they may reside in
> >>>>>> /lib/modules/<version>/vdso/vdso{32,64}.so on Ubuntu. But notice that
> >>>>>> the buildid has to match.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> $ sudo perf record -a
> >>>>>> $ sudo perf report --objdump=llvm-objdump \
> >>>>>>   --vdso arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64.so.dbg,arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Samples: 17K of event 'cycles:P', 4000 Hz, Event count (approx.): 1760
> >>>>>> __vdso_clock_gettime  /work/linux-host/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso64.so.d
> >>>>>> Percent│       movq    -48(%rbp),%rsi
> >>>>>>        │       testq   %rax,%rax
> >>>>>>        │     ;               return vread_hvclock();
> >>>>>>        │       movq    %rax,%rdx
> >>>>>>        │     ;               if (unlikely(!vdso_cycles_ok(cycles)))
> >>>>>>        │     ↑ js      eb
> >>>>>>        │     ↑ jmp     74
> >>>>>>        │     ;               ts->tv_sec = vdso_ts->sec;
> >>>>>>   0.02 │147:   leaq    2(%rbx),%rax
> >>>>>>        │       shlq    $4, %rax
> >>>>>>        │       addq    %r10,%rax
> >>>>>>        │     ;               while ((seq = READ_ONCE(vd->seq)) & 1) {
> >>>>>>   9.38 │152:   movl    (%r10),%ecx
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> When doing cross platform analysis, we also need specify the vdso path if
> >>>>>> we are interested in its symbols.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Would it be possible to add vdso and vdso debug to the build-id
> >>>>> cache and ensure perf can find it there?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Typically, getting dsos from another machine is handled via
> >>>>> build-id cache e.g. what perf-archive does
> >>>>>
> >>>> Hmm. I agree this is better alternative approach for cross-machine analysis.
> >>>> When collecting vdsos to buildid cache, I think we can use the local searched
> >>>> objects (with debug symbols) instead if its build-id matches vdsos from process
> >>>> dumping (the real code ran).
> >>>>
> >>>> Currently I just follow what perf does for vmlinux so to reuse most of existing
> >>>> code. Maybe vmlinux is too big to add to buildid-cahce?
> >>>>
> >>>> Can we keep our current strategy for now? I'll think about above options when
> >>>> I have more time.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I tried adding vdso via perf buildid-cache.  It doesn't work only
> >>> because the lookup expects the basename to be "vdso" but it is
> >>> "elf".
> >>>
> >>> Adding a link from "vdso" to "elf" made it work e.g.
> >>>
> >>> $ cat gettimeofday-test.c
> >>> #include <stdio.h>
> >>> #include <sys/time.h>
> >>>
> >>> int main()
> >>> {
> >>>         struct timeval tv;
> >>>         int ret;
> >>>
> >>>         ret = gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
> >>>         if (ret == -1) {
> >>>                 fprintf(stderr, "gettimeofday failed\n");
> >>>                 return 1;
> >>>         }
> >>>
> >>>         printf("%lu.%lu\n", (unsigned long)tv.tv_sec, (unsigned long)tv.tv_usec);
> >>>
> >>>         return 0;
> >>> $ perf record -e intel_pt//u ./gettimeofday-test
> >>> 1719397042.892837
> >>> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> >>> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.026 MB perf.data ]
> >>> $ perf script --itrace=e
> >>> $ perf buildid-cache --remove /lib/modules/6.5.0-41-generic/vdso/vdso64.so
> >>> $ perf script --itrace=e
> >>> Warning:
> >>> 2 instruction trace errors
> >>>  instruction trace error type 1 time 525345.386424204 cpu 4 pid 198976 tid 198976 ip 0x7ffddb0e8e00 code 5: Failed to get instruction
> >>>  instruction trace error type 1 time 525345.386424829 cpu 4 pid 198976 tid 198976 ip 0x7ffddb0e884d code 5: Failed to get instruction
> >>> $ perf buildid-cache --add /lib/modules/6.5.0-41-generic/vdso/vdso64.so
> >>> $ perf script --itrace=e
> >>> Warning:
> >>> 2 instruction trace errors
> >>>  instruction trace error type 1 time 525345.386424204 cpu 4 pid 198976 tid 198976 ip 0x7ffddb0e8e00 code 5: Failed to get instruction
> >>>  instruction trace error type 1 time 525345.386424829 cpu 4 pid 198976 tid 198976 ip 0x7ffddb0e884d code 5: Failed to get instruction
> >>> $ cd ~/.debug/.build-id/c3/530aed66e71bfd10af66039f58cc7c4d2eaba8
> >>> ~/.debug/.build-id/c3/530aed66e71bfd10af66039f58cc7c4d2eaba8$ ln -s elf vdso
> >>> ~/.debug/.build-id/c3/530aed66e71bfd10af66039f58cc7c4d2eaba8$ ls -l
> >>> total 36
> >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 ahunter ahunter 33272 Jun 26 13:17 elf
> >>> -rw-r----- 1 ahunter ahunter     0 Jun 26 13:17 probes
> >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 ahunter ahunter     3 Jun 26 13:18 vdso -> elf
> >>> /.debug/.build-id/c3/530aed66e71bfd10af66039f58cc7c4d2eaba8$ cd
> >>> $ perf script --itrace=e
> >>> $ 
> >>>
> >>> So maybe a change could be made to build_id_cache__add() to add
> >>> the extra link if the file name matches vdso
> >>  
> >> Thanks for doing this!  I noticed buildid_cache__basename() will handle
> >> the name properly once it realizes the file is a vdso.  Maybe we can
> >> check the filepath with some patterns, or simply add an command line
> >> option to say it's a vdso.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Namhyung
> >>
> > I added some tricks for vdso in build_id_cache__add(). It replace vdso object
> > with debugging one if found. Is this okay?
> 
> perf has support for storing debug files in the build-id
> cache using the base name "debug" instead of "elf", so really
> it would be better to make that work
>
My thoughts are:
  1. add debugging vdso file as "debug" in buildid cache.
  2. add a new perf config item 'annotate.prefer_debug_file' (default false) to
     annotate with debugging object files.

-- 
Cheers,
Changbin Du

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-29  2:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-25  3:37 [PATCH v4 0/5] perf: support specify vdso path in cmdline Changbin Du
2024-06-25  3:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] " Changbin Du
2024-06-25 13:20   ` Adrian Hunter
2024-06-26  2:26     ` duchangbin
2024-06-26 10:32       ` Adrian Hunter
2024-06-27 23:53         ` Namhyung Kim
2024-06-28  4:21           ` duchangbin
2024-06-28 17:27             ` Adrian Hunter
2024-06-29  2:32               ` duchangbin [this message]
2024-06-29 18:47                 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-07-01  2:30                   ` duchangbin
2024-06-25  3:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] perf: disasm: refactor function dso__disassemble_filename Changbin Du
2024-06-25  3:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] perf: disasm: use build_id_path if fallback failed Changbin Du
2024-06-25  3:37 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] perf: symbol: generalize vmlinux path searching Changbin Du
2024-06-25  3:37 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] perf: symbol: try to seach vdso path if not given by user Changbin Du

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=88e192fb4b82454bbb008b65be94ffae@huawei.com \
    --to=changbin.du@huawei.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).