linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Edward Baker <edward.baker@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] perf vendor events intel: Alderlake/rocketlake metric fixes
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 09:30:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8af821dc-d173-483d-8b69-b8e041538561@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fV+U4qSwU8nqHJMgAZTwtWs9jEm3i9yDQSVtq9Fbos5HA@mail.gmail.com>



On 2024-01-04 8:56 a.m., Ian Rogers wrote:
>> Testing tma_slow_pause
>> Metric 'tma_slow_pause' not printed in:
>> # Running 'internals/synthesize' benchmark:
>> Computing performance of single threaded perf event synthesis by
>> synthesizing events on the perf process itself:
>>   Average synthesis took: 49.987 usec (+- 0.049 usec)
>>   Average num. events: 47.000 (+- 0.000)
>>   Average time per event 1.064 usec
>>   Average data synthesis took: 53.490 usec (+- 0.033 usec)
>>   Average num. events: 245.000 (+- 0.000)
>>   Average time per event 0.218 usec
>>
>>  Performance counter stats for 'perf bench internals synthesize':
>>
>>      <not counted>      cpu_core/TOPDOWN.SLOTS/                                                 (0.00%)
>>      <not counted>      cpu_core/topdown-retiring/                                              (0.00%)
>>      <not counted>      cpu_core/topdown-mem-bound/                                             (0.00%)
>>      <not counted>      cpu_core/topdown-bad-spec/                                              (0.00%)
>>      <not counted>      cpu_core/topdown-fe-bound/                                              (0.00%)
>>      <not counted>      cpu_core/topdown-be-bound/                                              (0.00%)
>>      <not counted>      cpu_core/RESOURCE_STALLS.SCOREBOARD/                                        (0.00%)
>>      <not counted>      cpu_core/EXE_ACTIVITY.1_PORTS_UTIL/                                        (0.00%)
>>      <not counted>      cpu_core/EXE_ACTIVITY.BOUND_ON_LOADS/                                        (0.00%)
>>      <not counted>      cpu_core/CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.PAUSE/                                        (0.00%)
>>      <not counted>      cpu_core/CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_TOTAL/                                        (0.00%)
>>      <not counted>      cpu_core/CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD/                                        (0.00%)
>>      <not counted>      cpu_core/ARITH.DIV_ACTIVE/                                              (0.00%)
>>      <not counted>      cpu_core/EXE_ACTIVITY.2_PORTS_UTIL,umask=0xc/                                        (0.00%)
>>      <not counted>      cpu_core/EXE_ACTIVITY.3_PORTS_UTIL,umask=0x80/                                        (0.00%)
>>
>>        1.186254766 seconds time elapsed
>>
>>        0.427220000 seconds user
>>        0.752217000 seconds sys
>> Testing smi_cycles
>> Testing smi_num
>> Testing tsx_aborted_cycles
>> Testing tsx_cycles_per_elision
>> Testing tsx_cycles_per_transaction
>> Testing tsx_transactional_cycles
>> test child finished with -1
>> ---- end ----
>> perf all metrics test: FAILED!
>> root@number:~#
> Have a try disabling the NMI watchdog. Agreed that there is more to
> fix here but I think the PMU driver is in part to blame because
> manually breaking the weak group of events is a fix. 

I think we have a NO_GROUP_EVENTS_NMI metric constraint to mark a group
which require disabling of the NMI watchdog.
Maybe we should mark the group a NO_GROUP_EVENTS_NMI metric.

Thanks,
Kan

> Fwiw, if we
> switch to the buddy watchdog mechanism then we'll no longer need to
> disable the NMI watchdog:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230421155255.1.I6bf789d21d0c3d75d382e7e51a804a7a51315f2c@changeid/

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-04 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-04  7:42 [PATCH v1 1/4] perf vendor events intel: Alderlake/rocketlake metric fixes Ian Rogers
2024-01-04  7:42 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] perf vendor events intel: Update emeraldrapids events to v1.02 Ian Rogers
2024-01-04  7:42 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] perf vendor events intel: Update icelakex events to v1.23 Ian Rogers
2024-01-04  7:42 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] perf vendor events intel: Update sapphirerapids events to v1.17 Ian Rogers
2024-01-04 12:39 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] perf vendor events intel: Alderlake/rocketlake metric fixes Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-01-04 13:56   ` Ian Rogers
2024-01-04 14:30     ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2024-01-04 17:51       ` Ian Rogers
2024-01-04 19:30         ` Liang, Kan
2024-01-04 23:31           ` Ian Rogers
2024-01-04 20:37     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-01-04 14:23 ` Liang, Kan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8af821dc-d173-483d-8b69-b8e041538561@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=edward.baker@intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).