From: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: adrian.hunter@intel.com, leo.yan@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, thomas.falcon@intel.com,
namhyung@kernel.org, acme@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf metricgroup: Avoid scanning unnecessary PMUs for identifier match
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 10:12:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c5343a3-a110-420b-9b61-3e4dd0e3c902@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430161725.3131665-1-irogers@google.com>
On 30/04/2026 5:17 pm, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Only uncore PMUs can have an identifier, so add an optimized
> perf_pmus__scan routine for that case to avoid all PMU types being
> created.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c | 11 +++--------
> tools/perf/util/pmus.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> tools/perf/util/pmus.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> index 4db9578efd81..5a489e97c413 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> @@ -415,14 +415,9 @@ static int metricgroup__sys_event_iter(const struct pmu_metric *pm,
> if (!pm->metric_expr || !pm->compat)
> return 0;
>
> - while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan(pmu))) {
> -
> - if (!pmu->id || !pmu_uncore_identifier_match(pm->compat, pmu->id))
> - continue;
> -
> - return d->fn(pm, table, d->data);
> - }
> - return 0;
> + /* Only process with the iterator if there is a a PMU that matches the ID. */
> + pmu = perf_pmus__scan_for_uncore_id(pmu, pm->compat);
> + return pmu ? d->fn(pm, table, d->data) : 0;
> }
>
> int metricgroup__for_each_metric(const struct pmu_metrics_table *table, pmu_metric_iter_fn fn,
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmus.c b/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
> index 9a2023ceeefd..5e3f571450fe 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
> @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan_matching_wildcard(struct perf_pmu *pmu, const c
> if (!pmu) {
> /*
> * Core PMUs, other sysfs PMUs and tool PMU can have any name or
> - * aren't wother optimizing for.
> + * aren't worth optimizing for.
> */
> unsigned int to_read_pmus = PERF_TOOL_PMU_TYPE_PE_CORE_MASK |
> PERF_TOOL_PMU_TYPE_PE_OTHER_MASK |
> @@ -486,6 +486,22 @@ static struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan_skip_duplicates(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan_for_uncore_id(struct perf_pmu *pmu, const char *compat)
> +{
> + if (!pmu) {
> + /* Only uncore PMUs can have identifiers. */
> + unsigned int to_read_pmus = PERF_TOOL_PMU_TYPE_PE_OTHER_MASK;
> +
> + pmu_read_sysfs(to_read_pmus);
> + pmu = list_prepare_entry(pmu, &other_pmus, list);
> + }
> + list_for_each_entry_continue(pmu, &other_pmus, list) {
> + if (pmu->id && pmu_uncore_identifier_match(compat, pmu->id))
> + return pmu;
> + }
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> const struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__pmu_for_pmu_filter(const char *str)
> {
> struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmus.h b/tools/perf/util/pmus.h
> index 7cb36863711a..0d55edb3f2fc 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmus.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmus.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan(struct perf_pmu *pmu);
> struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan_core(struct perf_pmu *pmu);
> struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan_for_event(struct perf_pmu *pmu, const char *event);
> struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan_matching_wildcard(struct perf_pmu *pmu, const char *wildcard);
> +struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan_for_uncore_id(struct perf_pmu *pmu, const char *compat);
>
> const struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__pmu_for_pmu_filter(const char *str);
>
Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-26 22:44 [PATCH v1] perf metricgroup: Avoid scanning unnecessary PMUs for identifier match Ian Rogers
2026-03-30 14:44 ` James Clark
2026-03-31 6:30 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-03-31 14:05 ` Ian Rogers
2026-04-01 3:51 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-30 16:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Ian Rogers
2026-05-05 21:24 ` Ian Rogers
2026-05-06 9:12 ` James Clark [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8c5343a3-a110-420b-9b61-3e4dd0e3c902@linaro.org \
--to=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox