From: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linux.dev>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] perf tools: Track all user changed config bits
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 10:40:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <978dd9b1-1cb0-4338-95fa-575a858cea80@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251202101556.GR724103@e132581.arm.com>
On 02/12/2025 10:15 am, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 04:41:04PM +0000, Coresight ML wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> +#define ADD_CONFIG_CHG(format_type, term_type, new_term) \
>> +{ \
>> + struct parse_events_term *term; \
>> + u64 bits = 0; \
>> + int type; \
>> + \
>> + list_for_each_entry(term, &head_config->terms, list) { \
>> + if (term->type_term == PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_USER) { \
>> + type = perf_pmu__format_type(pmu, term->config);\
>> + if (type != format_type) \
>> + continue; \
>> + bits |= perf_pmu__format_bits(pmu, term->config); \
>> + } else if (term->type_term == term_type) { \
>> + bits = ~(u64)0; \
>> + } \
>> + } \
>> + \
>> + if (bits) \
>> + ADD_CONFIG_TERM_VAL(new_term, cfg_chg, bits, false); \
>> + return 0; \
>
> Nitpick: "return 0" is not needed here. Otherwise:
>
> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
I think it's worse than not needed, it makes it stop collecting the
changes after the first one.
It was annoying that this had to be a macro instead of a function
because ADD_CONFIG_TERM_VAL constructs the #define name of the first
argument.
It's probably worth putting in some effort to make ADD_CONFIG_CHG() a
function to avoid problems like this and maybe add a test.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-02 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-01 16:41 [PATCH 0/7] perf cs-etm/arm-spe: Remove hard coded config fields James Clark
2025-12-01 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf tools: Track all user changed config bits James Clark
2025-12-02 10:15 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-02 10:40 ` James Clark [this message]
2025-12-02 11:21 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-02 12:36 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-01 16:41 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf tools: apply evsel__set_config_if_unset() to all config fields James Clark
2025-12-02 11:14 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-04 10:55 ` James Clark
2025-12-01 16:41 ` [PATCH 3/7] perf cs-etm: Make a helper to find the Coresight evsel James Clark
2025-12-02 11:24 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-01 16:41 ` [PATCH 4/7] perf cs-etm: Don't use hard coded config bits when setting up ETMCR James Clark
2025-12-02 11:43 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-02 11:53 ` James Clark
2025-12-04 10:55 ` James Clark
2025-12-04 13:45 ` Mike Leach
2025-12-04 13:48 ` James Clark
2025-12-01 16:41 ` [PATCH 5/7] perf cs-etm: Don't use hard coded config bits when setting up TRCCONFIGR James Clark
2025-12-02 12:01 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-01 16:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] perf cs-etm: Don't hard code config attribute when configuring the event James Clark
2025-12-02 12:15 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-04 14:08 ` James Clark
2025-12-04 14:43 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-01 16:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf arm-spe: Don't hard code config attribute James Clark
2025-12-02 12:28 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-02 12:42 ` Leo Yan
2025-12-02 12:59 ` James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=978dd9b1-1cb0-4338-95fa-575a858cea80@linaro.org \
--to=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).