From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arun Sharma Subject: Re: [perfmon2] updating perf tool Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:04:35 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20110214194428.GE21384@ghostprotocols.net> <20110214204830.GF21384@ghostprotocols.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:41120 "EHLO mail-iw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751079Ab1BNWEg (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:04:36 -0500 Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so5289090iwn.19 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:04:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110214204830.GF21384@ghostprotocols.net> Sender: linux-perf-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Can Hankendi , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >> Potentially, perf itself could be structured as a set of shared >> libraries, which are then glued together using a scripting language. > > That is what I'm talking about, see above commit. > Sorry, I misunderstood. Looks like a step in the right direction! -Arun