From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
To: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Naresh Kamboju" <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de,
conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, achill@achill.org,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
"Anders Roxell" <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
"Ben Copeland" <benjamin.copeland@linaro.org>,
"LTP List" <ltp@lists.linux.it>, chrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>,
"Petr Vorel" <pvorel@suse.cz>, "Ian Rogers" <irogers@google.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
"Zhang Yi" <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>,
"Joseph Qi" <jiangqi903@gmail.com>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.16 000/627] 6.16.1-rc1 review
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 19:11:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYtjAWpeFfb3DesEY8y6aOefkLOVBE=zxsROWLzP_V_iDg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf9ccc7d-036d-46eb-85a1-b46317e2d556@sirena.org.uk>
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 at 18:21, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 05:46:26PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 at 23:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> > The following list of LTP syscalls failure noticed on qemu-arm64 with
> > stable-rc 6.16.1-rc1 with CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y build configuration.
> >
> > Most failures report ENOSPC (28) or mkswap errors, which may be related
> > to disk space handling in the 64K page configuration on qemu-arm64.
> >
> > The issue is reproducible on multiple runs.
> >
> > * qemu-arm64, ltp-syscalls - 64K page size test failures list,
> >
> > - fallocate04
> > - fallocate05
> > - fdatasync03
> > - fsync01
> > - fsync04
> > - ioctl_fiemap01
> > - swapoff01
> > - swapoff02
> > - swapon01
> > - swapon02
> > - swapon03
> > - sync01
> > - sync_file_range02
> > - syncfs01
These test failures are not seen on Linus tree v6.16 or v6.15.
>
> I'm also seeing epoll_ctl04 failing on Raspberry Pi 4, there's a bisect
> still running but I suspect given the error message:
Right !
LTP syscalls epoll_ctl04 test is failing on Linux mainline as well
with this error on LKFT CI system on several platforms.
>
> epoll_ctl04.c:59: TFAIL: epoll_ctl(..., EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ...) with number of nesting is 5 expected EINVAL: ELOOP (40)
>
> that it might be:
>
> # bad: [b47ce23d38c737a2f84af2b18c5e6b6e09e4932d] eventpoll: Fix semi-unbounded recursion
>
> which already got tested, or something adjacent.
A patch has been proposed to update the LTP test case to align with
recent changes in the Linux kernel code.
[LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/epoll_ctl04: add ELOOP to expected errnos
-https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/39ee7abdee12e22074b40d46775d69d37725b932.1754386027.git.jstancek@redhat.com/
- Naresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-13 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250812173419.303046420@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-08-13 12:16 ` [PATCH 6.16 000/627] 6.16.1-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
2025-08-13 12:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-08-13 14:31 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-08-13 14:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-08-13 15:58 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-08-14 1:27 ` Zhang Yi
2025-08-14 15:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-08-14 20:19 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-08-15 5:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-08-15 16:24 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-08-13 12:51 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-13 13:41 ` Naresh Kamboju [this message]
2025-08-14 15:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+G9fYtjAWpeFfb3DesEY8y6aOefkLOVBE=zxsROWLzP_V_iDg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=achill@achill.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benjamin.copeland@linaro.org \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hargar@microsoft.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jiangqi903@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rwarsow@gmx.de \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=srw@sladewatkins.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).