From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
D Scott Phillips <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/6] arm64: smp: Add arch support for backtrace using pseudo-NMI
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 17:27:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n52iVDgZa8XT8KTMj12c_ESSJt7f7A0fuZ_oAMMqpGcSzA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230824083012.v11.4.Ie6c132b96ebbbcddbf6954b9469ed40a6960343c@changeid>
Quoting Douglas Anderson (2023-08-24 08:30:30)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h
> index fac08e18bcd5..50ce8b697ff3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@
>
> #include <asm-generic/irq.h>
>
> +void arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(const cpumask_t *mask, int exclude_cpu);
Some nits, but otherwise
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
> +#define arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace
> +
> struct pt_regs;
>
> int set_handle_irq(void (*handle_irq)(struct pt_regs *));
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index a5848f1ef817..c8896cbc5327 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -72,12 +73,18 @@ enum ipi_msg_type {
> IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP,
> IPI_TIMER,
> IPI_IRQ_WORK,
> - NR_IPI
> + NR_IPI,
> + /*
> + * Any enum >= NR_IPI and < MAX_IPI is special and not tracable
> + * with trace_ipi_*
> + */
> + IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE = NR_IPI,
> + MAX_IPI
> };
>
> static int ipi_irq_base __read_mostly;
> static int nr_ipi __read_mostly = NR_IPI;
> -static struct irq_desc *ipi_desc[NR_IPI] __read_mostly;
> +static struct irq_desc *ipi_desc[MAX_IPI] __read_mostly;
Side note: it would be nice to mark ipi_desc as __ro_after_init. Same
for nr_ipi and ipi_irq_base.
>
> static void ipi_setup(int cpu);
>
> @@ -845,6 +852,22 @@ static void __noreturn ipi_cpu_crash_stop(unsigned int cpu, struct pt_regs *regs
> #endif
> }
>
> +static void arm64_backtrace_ipi(cpumask_t *mask)
> +{
> + __ipi_send_mask(ipi_desc[IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE], mask);
> +}
> +
> +void arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(const cpumask_t *mask, int exclude_cpu)
Can this be 'bool exclude_self' instead of int? That matches all other
implementations from what I can tell.
> +{
> + /*
> + * NOTE: though nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace has "nmi_" in the name,
USe nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace() to indicate function.
> + * nothing about it truly needs to be implemented using an NMI, it's
> + * just that it's _allowed_ to work with NMIs. If ipi_should_be_nmi()
> + * returned false our backtrace attempt will just use a regular IPI.
> + */
> + nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(mask, exclude_cpu, arm64_backtrace_ipi);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-25 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-24 15:30 [PATCH v11 0/6] arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs Douglas Anderson
2023-08-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs Douglas Anderson
2023-08-26 10:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-08-28 15:35 ` Doug Anderson
2023-08-29 10:36 ` Sumit Garg
2023-08-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v11 2/6] arm64: idle: Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle Douglas Anderson
2023-08-29 10:38 ` Sumit Garg
2023-08-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v11 3/6] arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI Douglas Anderson
2023-08-25 22:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2023-08-29 10:41 ` Sumit Garg
2023-08-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] arm64: smp: Add arch support for backtrace using pseudo-NMI Douglas Anderson
2023-08-25 22:27 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2023-08-25 23:02 ` Doug Anderson
2023-08-25 23:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2023-08-29 5:23 ` Tomohiro Misono (Fujitsu)
2023-08-29 16:03 ` Doug Anderson
2023-08-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v11 5/6] arm64: smp: IPI_CPU_STOP and IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP should try for NMI Douglas Anderson
2023-08-29 5:30 ` Tomohiro Misono (Fujitsu)
2023-08-29 10:42 ` Sumit Garg
2023-08-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] arm64: kgdb: Implement kgdb_roundup_cpus() to enable pseudo-NMI roundup Douglas Anderson
2023-08-25 11:20 ` Daniel Thompson
2023-08-25 22:28 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAE-0n52iVDgZa8XT8KTMj12c_ESSJt7f7A0fuZ_oAMMqpGcSzA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).