linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	D Scott Phillips <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/6] arm64: smp: Add arch support for backtrace using pseudo-NMI
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 17:27:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n52iVDgZa8XT8KTMj12c_ESSJt7f7A0fuZ_oAMMqpGcSzA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230824083012.v11.4.Ie6c132b96ebbbcddbf6954b9469ed40a6960343c@changeid>

Quoting Douglas Anderson (2023-08-24 08:30:30)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h
> index fac08e18bcd5..50ce8b697ff3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@
>
>  #include <asm-generic/irq.h>
>
> +void arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(const cpumask_t *mask, int exclude_cpu);

Some nits, but otherwise

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>

> +#define arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace
> +
>  struct pt_regs;
>
>  int set_handle_irq(void (*handle_irq)(struct pt_regs *));
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index a5848f1ef817..c8896cbc5327 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -72,12 +73,18 @@ enum ipi_msg_type {
>         IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP,
>         IPI_TIMER,
>         IPI_IRQ_WORK,
> -       NR_IPI
> +       NR_IPI,
> +       /*
> +        * Any enum >= NR_IPI and < MAX_IPI is special and not tracable
> +        * with trace_ipi_*
> +        */
> +       IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE = NR_IPI,
> +       MAX_IPI
>  };
>
>  static int ipi_irq_base __read_mostly;
>  static int nr_ipi __read_mostly = NR_IPI;
> -static struct irq_desc *ipi_desc[NR_IPI] __read_mostly;
> +static struct irq_desc *ipi_desc[MAX_IPI] __read_mostly;

Side note: it would be nice to mark ipi_desc as __ro_after_init. Same
for nr_ipi and ipi_irq_base.

>
>  static void ipi_setup(int cpu);
>
> @@ -845,6 +852,22 @@ static void __noreturn ipi_cpu_crash_stop(unsigned int cpu, struct pt_regs *regs
>  #endif
>  }
>
> +static void arm64_backtrace_ipi(cpumask_t *mask)
> +{
> +       __ipi_send_mask(ipi_desc[IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE], mask);
> +}
> +
> +void arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(const cpumask_t *mask, int exclude_cpu)

Can this be 'bool exclude_self' instead of int? That matches all other
implementations from what I can tell.

> +{
> +       /*
> +        * NOTE: though nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace has "nmi_" in the name,

USe nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace() to indicate function.

> +        * nothing about it truly needs to be implemented using an NMI, it's
> +        * just that it's _allowed_ to work with NMIs. If ipi_should_be_nmi()
> +        * returned false our backtrace attempt will just use a regular IPI.
> +        */
> +       nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(mask, exclude_cpu, arm64_backtrace_ipi);

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-25 22:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-24 15:30 [PATCH v11 0/6] arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs Douglas Anderson
2023-08-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs Douglas Anderson
2023-08-26 10:36   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-08-28 15:35     ` Doug Anderson
2023-08-29 10:36   ` Sumit Garg
2023-08-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v11 2/6] arm64: idle: Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle Douglas Anderson
2023-08-29 10:38   ` Sumit Garg
2023-08-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v11 3/6] arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI Douglas Anderson
2023-08-25 22:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2023-08-29 10:41   ` Sumit Garg
2023-08-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] arm64: smp: Add arch support for backtrace using pseudo-NMI Douglas Anderson
2023-08-25 22:27   ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2023-08-25 23:02     ` Doug Anderson
2023-08-25 23:23       ` Stephen Boyd
2023-08-29  5:23   ` Tomohiro Misono (Fujitsu)
2023-08-29 16:03     ` Doug Anderson
2023-08-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v11 5/6] arm64: smp: IPI_CPU_STOP and IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP should try for NMI Douglas Anderson
2023-08-29  5:30   ` Tomohiro Misono (Fujitsu)
2023-08-29 10:42   ` Sumit Garg
2023-08-24 15:30 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] arm64: kgdb: Implement kgdb_roundup_cpus() to enable pseudo-NMI roundup Douglas Anderson
2023-08-25 11:20   ` Daniel Thompson
2023-08-25 22:28   ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAE-0n52iVDgZa8XT8KTMj12c_ESSJt7f7A0fuZ_oAMMqpGcSzA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).