linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
To: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Cc: Kyle Huey <khuey@kylehuey.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	 Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	 Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	 "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 2/4] perf/bpf: Remove unneeded uses_default_overflow_handler.
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 16:12:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzZM6gDH4_X86p0WhiLHY-m89c_8Km-a=dYGGc+7fUCrMg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240214173950.18570-3-khuey@kylehuey.com>

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 9:40 AM Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com> wrote:
>
> Now that struct perf_event's orig_overflow_handler is gone, there's no need
> for the functions and macros to support looking past overflow_handler to
> orig_overflow_handler.
>
> This patch is solely a refactoring and results in no behavior change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <khuey@kylehuey.com>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> ---

oh, never mind what I said in the first patch about this :)

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

>  arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c   |  8 ++++----
>  arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c |  4 ++--
>  include/linux/perf_event.h        | 16 ++--------------
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> index dc0fb7a81371..054e9199f30d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ int hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(struct perf_event *bp,
>         hw->address &= ~alignment_mask;
>         hw->ctrl.len <<= offset;
>
> -       if (uses_default_overflow_handler(bp)) {
> +       if (is_default_overflow_handler(bp)) {
>                 /*
>                  * Mismatch breakpoints are required for single-stepping
>                  * breakpoints.
> @@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ static void watchpoint_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr,
>                  * Otherwise, insert a temporary mismatch breakpoint so that
>                  * we can single-step over the watchpoint trigger.
>                  */
> -               if (!uses_default_overflow_handler(wp))
> +               if (!is_default_overflow_handler(wp))
>                         continue;
>  step:
>                 enable_single_step(wp, instruction_pointer(regs));
> @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ static void watchpoint_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr,
>                 info->trigger = addr;
>                 pr_debug("watchpoint fired: address = 0x%x\n", info->trigger);
>                 perf_bp_event(wp, regs);
> -               if (uses_default_overflow_handler(wp))
> +               if (is_default_overflow_handler(wp))
>                         enable_single_step(wp, instruction_pointer(regs));
>         }
>
> @@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ static void breakpoint_handler(unsigned long unknown, struct pt_regs *regs)
>                         info->trigger = addr;
>                         pr_debug("breakpoint fired: address = 0x%x\n", addr);
>                         perf_bp_event(bp, regs);
> -                       if (uses_default_overflow_handler(bp))
> +                       if (is_default_overflow_handler(bp))
>                                 enable_single_step(bp, addr);
>                         goto unlock;
>                 }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> index 35225632d70a..db2a1861bb97 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ static int breakpoint_handler(unsigned long unused, unsigned long esr,
>                 perf_bp_event(bp, regs);
>
>                 /* Do we need to handle the stepping? */
> -               if (uses_default_overflow_handler(bp))
> +               if (is_default_overflow_handler(bp))
>                         step = 1;
>  unlock:
>                 rcu_read_unlock();
> @@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ static u64 get_distance_from_watchpoint(unsigned long addr, u64 val,
>  static int watchpoint_report(struct perf_event *wp, unsigned long addr,
>                              struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> -       int step = uses_default_overflow_handler(wp);
> +       int step = is_default_overflow_handler(wp);
>         struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info = counter_arch_bp(wp);
>
>         info->trigger = addr;
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index c7f54fd74d89..c8bd5bb6610c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -1341,8 +1341,9 @@ extern int perf_event_output(struct perf_event *event,
>                              struct pt_regs *regs);
>
>  static inline bool
> -__is_default_overflow_handler(perf_overflow_handler_t overflow_handler)
> +is_default_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event)
>  {
> +       perf_overflow_handler_t overflow_handler = event->overflow_handler;
>         if (likely(overflow_handler == perf_event_output_forward))
>                 return true;
>         if (unlikely(overflow_handler == perf_event_output_backward))
> @@ -1350,19 +1351,6 @@ __is_default_overflow_handler(perf_overflow_handler_t overflow_handler)
>         return false;
>  }
>
> -#define is_default_overflow_handler(event) \
> -       __is_default_overflow_handler((event)->overflow_handler)
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> -static inline bool uses_default_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event)
> -{
> -       return is_default_overflow_handler(event);
> -}
> -#else
> -#define uses_default_overflow_handler(event) \
> -       is_default_overflow_handler(event)
> -#endif
> -
>  extern void
>  perf_event_header__init_id(struct perf_event_header *header,
>                            struct perf_sample_data *data,
> --
> 2.34.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-16  0:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240214173950.18570-1-khuey@kylehuey.com>
2024-02-14 17:39 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 1/4] perf/bpf: Call bpf handler directly, not through overflow machinery Kyle Huey
2024-02-16  0:11   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-10  4:31   ` Ingo Molnar
2024-04-11 12:11     ` Kyle Huey
2024-04-12  1:47       ` Kyle Huey
2024-02-14 17:39 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 2/4] perf/bpf: Remove unneeded uses_default_overflow_handler Kyle Huey
2024-02-16  0:12   ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2024-04-10  4:35   ` Ingo Molnar
2024-02-14 17:39 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 3/4] perf/bpf: Allow a bpf program to suppress all sample side effects Kyle Huey
2024-02-16  0:13   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-02-16  1:59     ` Kyle Huey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAEf4BzZM6gDH4_X86p0WhiLHY-m89c_8Km-a=dYGGc+7fUCrMg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=khuey@kylehuey.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=me@kylehuey.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robert@ocallahan.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).