From: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@engflow.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM"
<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tests: add test for trace output loss
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 14:06:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH0uvohtu_XQochZ_nguXN4e65C_m88Chip1mm84uDRLBXagzA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241106234518.115234-2-benjamin@engflow.com>
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 3:46 PM Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@engflow.com> wrote:
>
> Add a test that checks that trace output is not lost to races. This is
> accomplished by tracing the exit_group syscall of "true" multiple times and
> checking for correct output.
>
> Conveniently, this test also serves as a regression test for 5fb8e56542a3 ("perf
> trace: avoid garbage when not printing a trace event's arguments") because
> exit_group triggers the previously buggy printing behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@engflow.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_exit_race.sh | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_exit_race.sh
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_exit_race.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_exit_race.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..8b70324bc5b4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_exit_race.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +# perf trace exit race
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +# Check that the last events of a perf trace'd subprocess are not
> +# lost. Specifically, trace the exiting syscall of "true" 100 times and ensure
> +# the output contains 100 correct lines.
> +
> +# shellcheck source=lib/probe.sh
> +. "$(dirname $0)"/lib/probe.sh
> +
> +skip_if_no_perf_trace || exit 2
> +
> +trace_shutdown_race() {
> + for i in $(seq 100); do
> + perf trace -e syscalls:sys_enter_exit_group true 2>>$file
> + done
> + [ $(grep -c -E " +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+ +true/[0-9]+ syscalls:sys_enter_exit_group\(\)$" $file) = "100" ]
The test failed due to regex mismatched, I think because of this:
0.000 true/1526046 syscalls:sys_enter_exit_group( )
0.000 true/1526212 syscalls:sys_enter_exit_group( )
0.000 true/1526383 syscalls:sys_enter_exit_group(SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS)
Ironically the junk buffer problem you fixed last time, thanks for
finding another printing problem in perf trace :), I'll figure out the
cause of this.
Another thing is this test takes a long time to finish
perf $ time ./perf test 109
109: perf trace exit race : FAILED!
real 0m38.762s
user 0m15.090s
sys 0m21.794s
Is it really necessary to run it 100 times? To me it seems to be just
a wrong handling logic of draining samples, will there be coincidence?
Thanks,
Howard
> +}
> +
> +
> +file=$(mktemp /tmp/temporary_file.XXXXX)
> +
> +# Do not use whatever ~/.perfconfig file, it may change the output
> +# via trace.{show_timestamp,show_prefix,etc}
> +export PERF_CONFIG=/dev/null
> +
> +trace_shutdown_race
> +err=$?
> +rm -f ${file}
> +exit $err
> --
> 2.39.5
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-07 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-06 23:45 [PATCH 1/2] perf trace: do not lose last events in a race Benjamin Peterson
2024-11-06 23:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf tests: add test for trace output loss Benjamin Peterson
2024-11-07 22:06 ` Howard Chu [this message]
2024-11-07 23:17 ` Benjamin Peterson
2024-11-08 16:20 ` Howard Chu
2024-11-08 16:59 ` Benjamin Peterson
2024-11-14 17:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-11-14 17:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-11-14 17:44 ` Benjamin Peterson
2024-11-14 20:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-11-14 20:16 ` Howard Chu
2024-11-14 21:03 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-11-14 20:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-11-07 21:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf trace: do not lose last events in a race Howard Chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAH0uvohtu_XQochZ_nguXN4e65C_m88Chip1mm84uDRLBXagzA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=howardchu95@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benjamin@engflow.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).