linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@engflow.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,  Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	 "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 "open list:PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM"
	<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tests: add test for trace output loss
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 14:06:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH0uvohtu_XQochZ_nguXN4e65C_m88Chip1mm84uDRLBXagzA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241106234518.115234-2-benjamin@engflow.com>

Hello,

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 3:46 PM Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@engflow.com> wrote:
>
> Add a test that checks that trace output is not lost to races. This is
> accomplished by tracing the exit_group syscall of "true" multiple times and
> checking for correct output.
>
> Conveniently, this test also serves as a regression test for 5fb8e56542a3 ("perf
> trace: avoid garbage when not printing a trace event's arguments") because
> exit_group triggers the previously buggy printing behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@engflow.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_exit_race.sh | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_exit_race.sh
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_exit_race.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_exit_race.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..8b70324bc5b4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_exit_race.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +# perf trace exit race
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +# Check that the last events of a perf trace'd subprocess are not
> +# lost. Specifically, trace the exiting syscall of "true" 100 times and ensure
> +# the output contains 100 correct lines.
> +
> +# shellcheck source=lib/probe.sh
> +. "$(dirname $0)"/lib/probe.sh
> +
> +skip_if_no_perf_trace || exit 2
> +
> +trace_shutdown_race() {
> +       for i in $(seq 100); do
> +               perf trace -e syscalls:sys_enter_exit_group true 2>>$file
> +       done
> +       [ $(grep -c -E " +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+ +true/[0-9]+ syscalls:sys_enter_exit_group\(\)$" $file) = "100" ]

The test failed due to regex mismatched, I think because of this:

     0.000 true/1526046 syscalls:sys_enter_exit_group( )
     0.000 true/1526212 syscalls:sys_enter_exit_group( )
     0.000 true/1526383 syscalls:sys_enter_exit_group(SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS)

Ironically the junk buffer problem you fixed last time, thanks for
finding another printing problem in perf trace :), I'll figure out the
cause of this.

Another thing is this test takes a long time to finish

perf $ time ./perf test 109
109: perf trace exit race                                            : FAILED!

real    0m38.762s
user    0m15.090s
sys     0m21.794s

Is it really necessary to run it 100 times? To me it seems to be just
a wrong handling logic of draining samples, will there be coincidence?

Thanks,
Howard
> +}
> +
> +
> +file=$(mktemp /tmp/temporary_file.XXXXX)
> +
> +# Do not use whatever ~/.perfconfig file, it may change the output
> +# via trace.{show_timestamp,show_prefix,etc}
> +export PERF_CONFIG=/dev/null
> +
> +trace_shutdown_race
> +err=$?
> +rm -f ${file}
> +exit $err
> --
> 2.39.5
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-07 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-06 23:45 [PATCH 1/2] perf trace: do not lose last events in a race Benjamin Peterson
2024-11-06 23:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf tests: add test for trace output loss Benjamin Peterson
2024-11-07 22:06   ` Howard Chu [this message]
2024-11-07 23:17     ` Benjamin Peterson
2024-11-08 16:20       ` Howard Chu
2024-11-08 16:59         ` Benjamin Peterson
2024-11-14 17:37   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-11-14 17:43     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-11-14 17:44       ` Benjamin Peterson
2024-11-14 20:09         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-11-14 20:16           ` Howard Chu
2024-11-14 21:03             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-11-14 20:50           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-11-07 21:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf trace: do not lose last events in a race Howard Chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAH0uvohtu_XQochZ_nguXN4e65C_m88Chip1mm84uDRLBXagzA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=howardchu95@gmail.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=benjamin@engflow.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).