* [PATCH v1] perf trace: Fix possible insufficient allocation of argument formats
@ 2025-03-24 23:52 Howard Chu
2025-03-24 23:58 ` Howard Chu
2025-03-26 18:21 ` Namhyung Kim
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Howard Chu @ 2025-03-24 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acme
Cc: mingo, namhyung, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin, jolsa, irogers,
adrian.hunter, peterz, kan.liang, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel,
Howard Chu
In my previous fix of runtime error(Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20250122025519.361873-1-howardchu95@gmail.com/),
I made a mistake of decrementing one unconditionally, regardless of
whether an extra 'syscall_nr' or 'nr' field was present in
libtraceevent's tp_format. This may cause perf trace to allocate one
fewer arg_fmt entry than needed for the accurate representation of syscall
arguments.
This patch corrects the mistake by checking the presence of'syscall_nr' or
'nr', and adjusting the length of arg_fmt[] accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com>
---
tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
index a102748bd0c9..ad6dad8e2453 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
@@ -2139,6 +2139,7 @@ static int syscall__read_info(struct syscall *sc, struct trace *trace)
char tp_name[128];
const char *name;
int err;
+ bool extra_nr = false;
if (sc->nonexistent)
return -EEXIST;
@@ -2176,20 +2177,22 @@ static int syscall__read_info(struct syscall *sc, struct trace *trace)
return err;
}
+ sc->args = sc->tp_format->format.fields;
+ if (!strcmp(sc->args->name, "__syscall_nr") || !strcmp(sc->args->name, "nr"))
+ extra_nr = true;
/*
* The tracepoint format contains __syscall_nr field, so it's one more
* than the actual number of syscall arguments.
*/
- if (syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(sc, sc->tp_format->format.nr_fields - 1))
+ if (syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(sc, sc->tp_format->format.nr_fields - (extra_nr ? 1 : 0)))
return -ENOMEM;
- sc->args = sc->tp_format->format.fields;
/*
* We need to check and discard the first variable '__syscall_nr'
* or 'nr' that mean the syscall number. It is needless here.
* So drop '__syscall_nr' or 'nr' field but does not exist on older kernels.
*/
- if (sc->args && (!strcmp(sc->args->name, "__syscall_nr") || !strcmp(sc->args->name, "nr"))) {
+ if (sc->args && extra_nr) {
sc->args = sc->args->next;
--sc->nr_args;
}
--
2.45.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] perf trace: Fix possible insufficient allocation of argument formats
2025-03-24 23:52 [PATCH v1] perf trace: Fix possible insufficient allocation of argument formats Howard Chu
@ 2025-03-24 23:58 ` Howard Chu
2025-03-26 18:21 ` Namhyung Kim
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Howard Chu @ 2025-03-24 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acme
Cc: mingo, namhyung, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin, jolsa, irogers,
adrian.hunter, peterz, kan.liang, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel
Hello,
Forgot to add, there should be:
Fixes: c7b87ce0dd10 ("perf trace: Fix runtime error of index out of bounds")
Thanks,
Howard
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 04:52:45PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> In my previous fix of runtime error(Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20250122025519.361873-1-howardchu95@gmail.com/),
> I made a mistake of decrementing one unconditionally, regardless of
> whether an extra 'syscall_nr' or 'nr' field was present in
> libtraceevent's tp_format. This may cause perf trace to allocate one
> fewer arg_fmt entry than needed for the accurate representation of syscall
> arguments.
>
> This patch corrects the mistake by checking the presence of'syscall_nr' or
> 'nr', and adjusting the length of arg_fmt[] accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> index a102748bd0c9..ad6dad8e2453 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> @@ -2139,6 +2139,7 @@ static int syscall__read_info(struct syscall *sc, struct trace *trace)
> char tp_name[128];
> const char *name;
> int err;
> + bool extra_nr = false;
>
> if (sc->nonexistent)
> return -EEXIST;
> @@ -2176,20 +2177,22 @@ static int syscall__read_info(struct syscall *sc, struct trace *trace)
> return err;
> }
>
> + sc->args = sc->tp_format->format.fields;
> + if (!strcmp(sc->args->name, "__syscall_nr") || !strcmp(sc->args->name, "nr"))
> + extra_nr = true;
> /*
> * The tracepoint format contains __syscall_nr field, so it's one more
> * than the actual number of syscall arguments.
> */
> - if (syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(sc, sc->tp_format->format.nr_fields - 1))
> + if (syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(sc, sc->tp_format->format.nr_fields - (extra_nr ? 1 : 0)))
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - sc->args = sc->tp_format->format.fields;
> /*
> * We need to check and discard the first variable '__syscall_nr'
> * or 'nr' that mean the syscall number. It is needless here.
> * So drop '__syscall_nr' or 'nr' field but does not exist on older kernels.
> */
> - if (sc->args && (!strcmp(sc->args->name, "__syscall_nr") || !strcmp(sc->args->name, "nr"))) {
> + if (sc->args && extra_nr) {
> sc->args = sc->args->next;
> --sc->nr_args;
> }
> --
> 2.45.2
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] perf trace: Fix possible insufficient allocation of argument formats
2025-03-24 23:52 [PATCH v1] perf trace: Fix possible insufficient allocation of argument formats Howard Chu
2025-03-24 23:58 ` Howard Chu
@ 2025-03-26 18:21 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-03-26 18:30 ` Howard Chu
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2025-03-26 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Howard Chu
Cc: acme, mingo, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin, jolsa, irogers,
adrian.hunter, peterz, kan.liang, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 04:52:45PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> In my previous fix of runtime error(Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20250122025519.361873-1-howardchu95@gmail.com/),
> I made a mistake of decrementing one unconditionally, regardless of
> whether an extra 'syscall_nr' or 'nr' field was present in
> libtraceevent's tp_format. This may cause perf trace to allocate one
> fewer arg_fmt entry than needed for the accurate representation of syscall
> arguments.
>
> This patch corrects the mistake by checking the presence of'syscall_nr' or
> 'nr', and adjusting the length of arg_fmt[] accordingly.
Thanks for the fix. I've noticed this too but I feel like we can make
syscall__alloc_arg_fmts() a bit simpler.
How about this?
Thanks,
Namhyung
---8<---
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
index 6ac51925ea4249c2..b9bdab52f5801c3a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
@@ -2022,9 +2022,6 @@ static int syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(struct syscall *sc, int nr_args)
{
int idx;
- if (nr_args == RAW_SYSCALL_ARGS_NUM && sc->fmt && sc->fmt->nr_args != 0)
- nr_args = sc->fmt->nr_args;
-
sc->arg_fmt = calloc(nr_args, sizeof(*sc->arg_fmt));
if (sc->arg_fmt == NULL)
return -1;
@@ -2034,7 +2031,6 @@ static int syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(struct syscall *sc, int nr_args)
sc->arg_fmt[idx] = sc->fmt->arg[idx];
}
- sc->nr_args = nr_args;
return 0;
}
@@ -2176,14 +2172,9 @@ static int syscall__read_info(struct syscall *sc, struct trace *trace)
return err;
}
- /*
- * The tracepoint format contains __syscall_nr field, so it's one more
- * than the actual number of syscall arguments.
- */
- if (syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(sc, sc->tp_format->format.nr_fields - 1))
- return -ENOMEM;
-
sc->args = sc->tp_format->format.fields;
+ sc->nr_args = sc->tp_format->format.nr_fields;
+
/*
* We need to check and discard the first variable '__syscall_nr'
* or 'nr' that mean the syscall number. It is needless here.
@@ -2194,6 +2185,9 @@ static int syscall__read_info(struct syscall *sc, struct trace *trace)
--sc->nr_args;
}
+ if (syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(sc, sc->nr_args))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
sc->is_exit = !strcmp(name, "exit_group") || !strcmp(name, "exit");
sc->is_open = !strcmp(name, "open") || !strcmp(name, "openat");
--
2.49.0.395.g12beb8f557-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] perf trace: Fix possible insufficient allocation of argument formats
2025-03-26 18:21 ` Namhyung Kim
@ 2025-03-26 18:30 ` Howard Chu
2025-03-26 19:44 ` Namhyung Kim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Howard Chu @ 2025-03-26 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Namhyung Kim
Cc: acme, mingo, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin, jolsa, irogers,
adrian.hunter, peterz, kan.liang, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel
Hello Namhyung,
LGTM. This is better. :)
Thanks,
Howard
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 11:21 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 04:52:45PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> > In my previous fix of runtime error(Link:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20250122025519.361873-1-howardchu95@gmail.com/),
> > I made a mistake of decrementing one unconditionally, regardless of
> > whether an extra 'syscall_nr' or 'nr' field was present in
> > libtraceevent's tp_format. This may cause perf trace to allocate one
> > fewer arg_fmt entry than needed for the accurate representation of syscall
> > arguments.
> >
> > This patch corrects the mistake by checking the presence of'syscall_nr' or
> > 'nr', and adjusting the length of arg_fmt[] accordingly.
>
> Thanks for the fix. I've noticed this too but I feel like we can make
> syscall__alloc_arg_fmts() a bit simpler.
>
> How about this?
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
>
> ---8<---
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> index 6ac51925ea4249c2..b9bdab52f5801c3a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> @@ -2022,9 +2022,6 @@ static int syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(struct syscall *sc, int nr_args)
> {
> int idx;
>
> - if (nr_args == RAW_SYSCALL_ARGS_NUM && sc->fmt && sc->fmt->nr_args != 0)
> - nr_args = sc->fmt->nr_args;
> -
> sc->arg_fmt = calloc(nr_args, sizeof(*sc->arg_fmt));
> if (sc->arg_fmt == NULL)
> return -1;
> @@ -2034,7 +2031,6 @@ static int syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(struct syscall *sc, int nr_args)
> sc->arg_fmt[idx] = sc->fmt->arg[idx];
> }
>
> - sc->nr_args = nr_args;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -2176,14 +2172,9 @@ static int syscall__read_info(struct syscall *sc, struct trace *trace)
> return err;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * The tracepoint format contains __syscall_nr field, so it's one more
> - * than the actual number of syscall arguments.
> - */
> - if (syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(sc, sc->tp_format->format.nr_fields - 1))
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> sc->args = sc->tp_format->format.fields;
> + sc->nr_args = sc->tp_format->format.nr_fields;
> +
> /*
> * We need to check and discard the first variable '__syscall_nr'
> * or 'nr' that mean the syscall number. It is needless here.
> @@ -2194,6 +2185,9 @@ static int syscall__read_info(struct syscall *sc, struct trace *trace)
> --sc->nr_args;
> }
>
> + if (syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(sc, sc->nr_args))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> sc->is_exit = !strcmp(name, "exit_group") || !strcmp(name, "exit");
> sc->is_open = !strcmp(name, "open") || !strcmp(name, "openat");
>
> --
> 2.49.0.395.g12beb8f557-goog
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] perf trace: Fix possible insufficient allocation of argument formats
2025-03-26 18:30 ` Howard Chu
@ 2025-03-26 19:44 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-03-26 19:52 ` Howard Chu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2025-03-26 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Howard Chu
Cc: acme, mingo, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin, jolsa, irogers,
adrian.hunter, peterz, kan.liang, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 11:30:11AM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> Hello Namhyung,
>
> LGTM. This is better. :)
Great, can you please resend it with my Suggested-by?
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 11:21 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 04:52:45PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> > > In my previous fix of runtime error(Link:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20250122025519.361873-1-howardchu95@gmail.com/),
> > > I made a mistake of decrementing one unconditionally, regardless of
> > > whether an extra 'syscall_nr' or 'nr' field was present in
> > > libtraceevent's tp_format. This may cause perf trace to allocate one
> > > fewer arg_fmt entry than needed for the accurate representation of syscall
> > > arguments.
> > >
> > > This patch corrects the mistake by checking the presence of'syscall_nr' or
> > > 'nr', and adjusting the length of arg_fmt[] accordingly.
> >
> > Thanks for the fix. I've noticed this too but I feel like we can make
> > syscall__alloc_arg_fmts() a bit simpler.
> >
> > How about this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Namhyung
> >
> >
> > ---8<---
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > index 6ac51925ea4249c2..b9bdab52f5801c3a 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > @@ -2022,9 +2022,6 @@ static int syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(struct syscall *sc, int nr_args)
> > {
> > int idx;
> >
> > - if (nr_args == RAW_SYSCALL_ARGS_NUM && sc->fmt && sc->fmt->nr_args != 0)
> > - nr_args = sc->fmt->nr_args;
> > -
> > sc->arg_fmt = calloc(nr_args, sizeof(*sc->arg_fmt));
> > if (sc->arg_fmt == NULL)
> > return -1;
> > @@ -2034,7 +2031,6 @@ static int syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(struct syscall *sc, int nr_args)
> > sc->arg_fmt[idx] = sc->fmt->arg[idx];
> > }
> >
> > - sc->nr_args = nr_args;
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2176,14 +2172,9 @@ static int syscall__read_info(struct syscall *sc, struct trace *trace)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > - /*
> > - * The tracepoint format contains __syscall_nr field, so it's one more
> > - * than the actual number of syscall arguments.
> > - */
> > - if (syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(sc, sc->tp_format->format.nr_fields - 1))
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> > sc->args = sc->tp_format->format.fields;
> > + sc->nr_args = sc->tp_format->format.nr_fields;
> > +
> > /*
> > * We need to check and discard the first variable '__syscall_nr'
> > * or 'nr' that mean the syscall number. It is needless here.
> > @@ -2194,6 +2185,9 @@ static int syscall__read_info(struct syscall *sc, struct trace *trace)
> > --sc->nr_args;
> > }
> >
> > + if (syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(sc, sc->nr_args))
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > sc->is_exit = !strcmp(name, "exit_group") || !strcmp(name, "exit");
> > sc->is_open = !strcmp(name, "open") || !strcmp(name, "openat");
> >
> > --
> > 2.49.0.395.g12beb8f557-goog
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] perf trace: Fix possible insufficient allocation of argument formats
2025-03-26 19:44 ` Namhyung Kim
@ 2025-03-26 19:52 ` Howard Chu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Howard Chu @ 2025-03-26 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Namhyung Kim
Cc: acme, mingo, mark.rutland, alexander.shishkin, jolsa, irogers,
adrian.hunter, peterz, kan.liang, linux-perf-users, linux-kernel
Hello Namhyung,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 12:44 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 11:30:11AM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> > Hello Namhyung,
> >
> > LGTM. This is better. :)
>
> Great, can you please resend it with my Suggested-by?
Sure.
Thanks,
Howard
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 11:21 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 04:52:45PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> > > > In my previous fix of runtime error(Link:
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20250122025519.361873-1-howardchu95@gmail.com/),
> > > > I made a mistake of decrementing one unconditionally, regardless of
> > > > whether an extra 'syscall_nr' or 'nr' field was present in
> > > > libtraceevent's tp_format. This may cause perf trace to allocate one
> > > > fewer arg_fmt entry than needed for the accurate representation of syscall
> > > > arguments.
> > > >
> > > > This patch corrects the mistake by checking the presence of'syscall_nr' or
> > > > 'nr', and adjusting the length of arg_fmt[] accordingly.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the fix. I've noticed this too but I feel like we can make
> > > syscall__alloc_arg_fmts() a bit simpler.
> > >
> > > How about this?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Namhyung
> > >
> > >
> > > ---8<---
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > > index 6ac51925ea4249c2..b9bdab52f5801c3a 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > > @@ -2022,9 +2022,6 @@ static int syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(struct syscall *sc, int nr_args)
> > > {
> > > int idx;
> > >
> > > - if (nr_args == RAW_SYSCALL_ARGS_NUM && sc->fmt && sc->fmt->nr_args != 0)
> > > - nr_args = sc->fmt->nr_args;
> > > -
> > > sc->arg_fmt = calloc(nr_args, sizeof(*sc->arg_fmt));
> > > if (sc->arg_fmt == NULL)
> > > return -1;
> > > @@ -2034,7 +2031,6 @@ static int syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(struct syscall *sc, int nr_args)
> > > sc->arg_fmt[idx] = sc->fmt->arg[idx];
> > > }
> > >
> > > - sc->nr_args = nr_args;
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -2176,14 +2172,9 @@ static int syscall__read_info(struct syscall *sc, struct trace *trace)
> > > return err;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - /*
> > > - * The tracepoint format contains __syscall_nr field, so it's one more
> > > - * than the actual number of syscall arguments.
> > > - */
> > > - if (syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(sc, sc->tp_format->format.nr_fields - 1))
> > > - return -ENOMEM;
> > > -
> > > sc->args = sc->tp_format->format.fields;
> > > + sc->nr_args = sc->tp_format->format.nr_fields;
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * We need to check and discard the first variable '__syscall_nr'
> > > * or 'nr' that mean the syscall number. It is needless here.
> > > @@ -2194,6 +2185,9 @@ static int syscall__read_info(struct syscall *sc, struct trace *trace)
> > > --sc->nr_args;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + if (syscall__alloc_arg_fmts(sc, sc->nr_args))
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > sc->is_exit = !strcmp(name, "exit_group") || !strcmp(name, "exit");
> > > sc->is_open = !strcmp(name, "open") || !strcmp(name, "openat");
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.49.0.395.g12beb8f557-goog
> > >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-03-26 19:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-03-24 23:52 [PATCH v1] perf trace: Fix possible insufficient allocation of argument formats Howard Chu
2025-03-24 23:58 ` Howard Chu
2025-03-26 18:21 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-03-26 18:30 ` Howard Chu
2025-03-26 19:44 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-03-26 19:52 ` Howard Chu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).