From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Nick Terrell <terrelln@fb.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>,
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <sesse@google.com>,
Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>,
Dmitrii Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>,
Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>,
Ming Wang <wangming01@loongson.cn>,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@huawei.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Li Dong <lidong@vivo.com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
liuwenyu <liuwenyu7@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Guilherme Amadio <amadio@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/25] perf maps: Switch from rbtree to lazily sorted array for addresses
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:37:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cgZbc2yTxi+7raw_sc=sSZASA2XEnLTPU4gZaAp9ceXig@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fW=Ov8hZ3qfYnTVAqV87bzYpS6jrPpxstdY3JdHx=pBGw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ian,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 8:21 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 6:48 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
[SNIP]
> > > +int maps__copy_from(struct maps *dest, struct maps *parent)
> > > +{
> > > + /* Note, if struct map were immutable then cloning could use ref counts. */
> > > + struct map **parent_maps_by_address;
> > > + int err = 0;
> > > + unsigned int n;
> > > +
> > > + down_write(maps__lock(dest));
> > > down_read(maps__lock(parent));
> > >
> > > - maps__for_each_entry(parent, rb_node) {
> > > - struct map *new = map__clone(rb_node->map);
> > > + parent_maps_by_address = maps__maps_by_address(parent);
> > > + n = maps__nr_maps(parent);
> > > + if (maps__empty(dest)) {
> > > + /* No existing mappings so just copy from parent to avoid reallocs in insert. */
> > > + unsigned int nr_maps_allocated = RC_CHK_ACCESS(parent)->nr_maps_allocated;
> > > + struct map **dest_maps_by_address =
> > > + malloc(nr_maps_allocated * sizeof(struct map *));
> > > + struct map **dest_maps_by_name = NULL;
> > >
> > > - if (new == NULL) {
> > > + if (!dest_maps_by_address)
> > > err = -ENOMEM;
> > > - goto out_unlock;
> > > + else {
> > > + if (maps__maps_by_name(parent)) {
> > > + dest_maps_by_name =
> > > + malloc(nr_maps_allocated * sizeof(struct map *));
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + RC_CHK_ACCESS(dest)->maps_by_address = dest_maps_by_address;
> > > + RC_CHK_ACCESS(dest)->maps_by_name = dest_maps_by_name;
> > > + RC_CHK_ACCESS(dest)->nr_maps_allocated = nr_maps_allocated;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - err = unwind__prepare_access(maps, new, NULL);
> > > - if (err)
> > > - goto out_unlock;
> > > + for (unsigned int i = 0; !err && i < n; i++) {
> > > + struct map *pos = parent_maps_by_address[i];
> > > + struct map *new = map__clone(pos);
> > >
> > > - err = maps__insert(maps, new);
> > > - if (err)
> > > - goto out_unlock;
> > > + if (!new)
> > > + err = -ENOMEM;
> > > + else {
> > > + err = unwind__prepare_access(dest, new, NULL);
> > > + if (!err) {
> > > + dest_maps_by_address[i] = new;
> > > + if (dest_maps_by_name)
> > > + dest_maps_by_name[i] = map__get(new);
> > > + RC_CHK_ACCESS(dest)->nr_maps = i + 1;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > + if (err)
> > > + map__put(new);
> > > + }
> > > + maps__set_maps_by_address_sorted(dest, maps__maps_by_address_sorted(parent));
> > > + if (!err) {
> > > + RC_CHK_ACCESS(dest)->last_search_by_name_idx =
> > > + RC_CHK_ACCESS(parent)->last_search_by_name_idx;
> > > + maps__set_maps_by_name_sorted(dest,
> > > + dest_maps_by_name &&
> > > + maps__maps_by_name_sorted(parent));
> > > + } else {
> > > + RC_CHK_ACCESS(dest)->last_search_by_name_idx = 0;
> > > + maps__set_maps_by_name_sorted(dest, false);
> > > + }
> > > + } else {
> > > + /* Unexpected copying to a maps containing entries. */
> > > + for (unsigned int i = 0; !err && i < n; i++) {
> > > + struct map *pos = parent_maps_by_address[i];
> > > + struct map *new = map__clone(pos);
> > >
> > > - map__put(new);
> > > + if (!new)
> > > + err = -ENOMEM;
> > > + else {
> > > + err = unwind__prepare_access(dest, new, NULL);
> > > + if (!err)
> > > + err = maps__insert(dest, new);
> >
> > Shouldn't it be __maps__insert()?
>
> On entry the read lock is taken on parent but no lock is taken on dest
> so the locked version is used.
I think you added the writer lock on dest.
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> > > + }
> > > + map__put(new);
> > > + }
> > > }
> > > -
> > > - err = 0;
> > > -out_unlock:
> > > up_read(maps__lock(parent));
> > > + up_write(maps__lock(dest));
> > > return err;
> > > }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-06 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-03 5:06 [PATCH v7 00/25] maps/threads/dsos memory improvements and fixes Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 01/25] perf maps: Switch from rbtree to lazily sorted array for addresses Ian Rogers
2024-02-02 2:48 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-02-02 4:20 ` Ian Rogers
2024-02-02 4:21 ` Ian Rogers
2024-02-06 0:37 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 02/25] perf maps: Get map before returning in maps__find Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 03/25] perf maps: Get map before returning in maps__find_by_name Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 04/25] perf maps: Get map before returning in maps__find_next_entry Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 05/25] perf maps: Hide maps internals Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 06/25] perf maps: Locking tidy up of nr_maps Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 07/25] perf dso: Reorder variables to save space in struct dso Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 08/25] perf report: Sort child tasks by tid Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 09/25] perf trace: Ignore thread hashing in summary Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 10/25] perf machine: Move fprintf to for_each loop and a callback Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 11/25] perf threads: Move threads to its own files Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 12/25] perf threads: Switch from rbtree to hashmap Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 13/25] perf threads: Reduce table size from 256 to 8 Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 14/25] perf dsos: Attempt to better abstract dsos internals Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 15/25] perf dsos: Tidy reference counting and locking Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 16/25] perf dsos: Add dsos__for_each_dso Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 17/25] perf dso: Move dso functions out of dsos Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 18/25] perf dsos: Switch more loops to dsos__for_each_dso Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 19/25] perf dsos: Switch backing storage to array from rbtree/list Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 20/25] perf dsos: Remove __dsos__addnew Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 21/25] perf dsos: Remove __dsos__findnew_link_by_longname_id Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 22/25] perf dsos: Switch hand code to bsearch Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 23/25] perf dso: Add reference count checking and accessor functions Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 24/25] perf dso: Reference counting related fixes Ian Rogers
2024-01-03 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 25/25] perf dso: Use container_of to avoid a pointer in dso_data Ian Rogers
2024-01-31 22:22 ` [PATCH v7 00/25] maps/threads/dsos memory improvements and fixes Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAM9d7cgZbc2yTxi+7raw_sc=sSZASA2XEnLTPU4gZaAp9ceXig@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=9erthalion6@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=amadio@gentoo.org \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=changbin.du@huawei.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
--cc=german.gomez@arm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=lidong@vivo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuwenyu7@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sesse@google.com \
--cc=terrelln@fb.com \
--cc=vincent.whitchurch@axis.com \
--cc=wangming01@loongson.cn \
--cc=yangjihong1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).