From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8FFFEC8743 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2023 16:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233514AbjIGQlV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2023 12:41:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44238 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241212AbjIGQlB (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2023 12:41:01 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb36.google.com (mail-yb1-xb36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b36]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A30A10CF; Thu, 7 Sep 2023 09:40:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb36.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-d7e6d9665bcso1026784276.1; Thu, 07 Sep 2023 09:40:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1694104450; x=1694709250; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ok2CriQTwYEsC/n/gnqFCKaHzQ1Eyzk+MG3g9UT+Zeo=; b=ksTlNc/0kx7NBz0A/4U6s9BBl7CTT4Ouul33W4ducuPCzsEBtAPqtkx71axozn9wl8 oXkmv1Bv0KYBrqhewHlHfpvJ9fyzTz1CcayVdJLU2oTvOO61rzTprYlhEFBjOhm/v+xS CZ9AUp108nOOyWw/Zn66hiaEi5zH+F5SQIsPSWbm1VysogAMUkVEdQdMWJeVnBLjB3yR 1oasg8ovuXD/9EBOezg+UccdKmSpieUZMsbEGfj+/tOctJhFjgy61LD3BIIcOuiAX0BX PcNmwT1zI27hhDvN9veCiJR3VQBXJDAxryY257gNrNC5EmwMIdqWat7cGNlSVsfpejgx xv+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwU/1WJlpqa9ziLQRYX7ZSMfObRHUa3xmtSh/Fq6/7+O8zjaVX+ +BcycOXK0p0y4BuWNUcwvWY2KR4teaocHrsqJCI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFORxOKHFqeh0WuVDZ5nkcMQqs+D80xPEyaTNXZH9YVDY5S2r6XCDnHRzxMvQHfnVxnd4F/z76XRWY+TerP/Kg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:120e:b0:d77:e463:7c0e with SMTP id s14-20020a056902120e00b00d77e4637c0emr24999040ybu.50.1694104450584; Thu, 07 Sep 2023 09:34:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230620170027.1861012-1-weilin.wang@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Namhyung Kim Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 09:33:58 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add metric value validation test To: "Wang, Weilin" Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , "Hunter, Adrian" , Ian Rogers , "linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Kan Liang , "Alt, Samantha" , "Taylor, Perry" , "Biggers, Caleb" , "ravi.bangoria@amd.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 9:58 PM Wang, Weilin wrote: > > Hi Namhyung, > > The report shows there are four metrics return with no values. Do you know which processor this was tested on? It's a laptop with 11th gen CPUs (tigerlake). $ head /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 140 model name : 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1185G7 @ 3.00GHz stepping : 1 microcode : 0xac cpu MHz : 3899.531 cache size : 12288 KB physical id : 0 > > I can look into the test and see if I could improve the final report to make it easier to debug when fails. Thanks, Namhyung