From: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Alexander Shishkin" <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
"Tom Rix" <trix@redhat.com>, "Weiguo Li" <liwg06@foxmail.com>,
"Athira Rajeev" <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Thomas Richter" <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
"Ravi Bangoria" <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
"Dario Petrillo" <dario.pk1@gmail.com>,
Hewenliang <hewenliang4@huawei.com>,
yaowenbin <yaowenbin1@huawei.com>,
"Wenyu Liu" <liuwenyu7@huawei.com>,
"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Dave Marchevsky" <davemarchevsky@fb.com>,
"Leo Yan" <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
"Kim Phillips" <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
"Pavithra Gurushankar" <gpavithrasha@gmail.com>,
"Alexandre Truong" <alexandre.truong@arm.com>,
"Quentin Monnet" <quentin@isovalent.com>,
"William Cohen" <wcohen@redhat.com>,
"Andres Freund" <andres@anarazel.de>,
"Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>,
"Colin Ian King" <colin.king@intel.com>,
"James Clark" <james.clark@arm.com>,
"Fangrui Song" <maskray@google.com>,
"Stephane Eranian" <eranian@google.com>,
"Kajol Jain" <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexey Bayduraev" <alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com>,
"Riccardo Mancini" <rickyman7@gmail.com>,
"Andi Kleen" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Zechuan Chen" <chenzechuan1@huawei.com>,
"Jason Wang" <wangborong@cdjrlc.com>,
"Christophe JAILLET" <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
"Remi Bernon" <rbernon@codeweavers.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 15/18] perf mutex: Add thread safety annotations
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 10:00:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fU0Kc+ZhVBXWz1zup1wFGUf8EOyaRREmfXDfD+hGGoL6w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ywj4vnYp6KGrrwl+@kernel.org>
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 9:45 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 08:38:58AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > Add thread safety annotations to struct mutex so that when compiled with
> > clang's -Wthread-safety warnings are generated for erroneous lock
> > patterns. NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS is needed for
> > mutex_lock/mutex_unlock as the analysis doesn't under pthread calls.
>
> So even having the guards checking if the attribute is available it
> seems at least clang 11.0 is needed, as the "lockable" arg was
> introduced there:
>
> 37 42.61 fedora:32 : FAIL clang version 10.0.1 (Fedora 10.0.1-3.fc32)
> In file included from /git/perf-6.0.0-rc2/tools/perf/util/../ui/ui.h:5:
> /git/perf-6.0.0-rc2/tools/perf/util/../ui/../util/mutex.h:74:8: error: invalid capability name 'lockable'; capability name must be 'mutex' or 'role' [-Werror,-Wthread-safety-attributes]
> struct LOCKABLE mutex {
> ^
> /git/perf-6.0.0-rc2/tools/perf/util/../ui/../util/mutex.h:35:44: note: expanded from macro 'LOCKABLE'
> #define LOCKABLE __attribute__((capability("lockable")))
capability("lockable") can just be lockable, the capability
generalization came in a later clang release.
That is change:
#define LOCKABLE __attribute__((capability("lockable")))
to:
#define LOCKABLE __attribute__((lockable))
and later clangs take the earlier name. Do you want a v5 for this 1 liner?
Thanks,
Ian
> The next fedora releases are ok with it:
>
> 38 124.89 fedora:33 : Ok gcc (GCC) 10.3.1 20210422 (Red Hat 10.3.1-1) , clang version 11.0.0 (Fedora 11.0.0-3.fc33)
> 39 132.20 fedora:34 : Ok gcc (GCC) 11.3.1 20220421 (Red Hat 11.3.1-2) , clang version 12.0.1 (Fedora 12.0.1-1.fc34)
> 40 21.44 fedora:34-x-ARC-glibc : Ok arc-linux-gcc (ARC HS GNU/Linux glibc toolchain 2019.03-rc1) 8.3.1 20190225
> 41 19.43 fedora:34-x-ARC-uClibc : Ok arc-linux-gcc (ARCv2 ISA Linux uClibc toolchain 2019.03-rc1) 8.3.1 20190225
> 42 136.33 fedora:35 : Ok gcc (GCC) 11.3.1 20220421 (Red Hat 11.3.1-2) , clang version 13.0.0 (Fedora 13.0.0-3.fc35)
> 43 137.73 fedora:36 : Ok gcc (GCC) 12.1.1 20220507 (Red Hat 12.1.1-1) , clang version 14.0.0 (Fedora 14.0.0-1.fc36)
> 44 140.45 fedora:37 : Ok gcc (GCC) 12.1.1 20220628 (Red Hat 12.1.1-3) , clang version 14.0.5 (Fedora 14.0.5-6.fc37)
> 45 126.80 fedora:38 : Ok gcc (GCC) 12.1.1 20220810 (Red Hat 12.1.1-4) , clang version 14.0.5 (Fedora 14.0.5-6.fc38)
> 46 127.00 fedora:rawhide : Ok gcc (GCC) 12.1.1 20220810 (Red Hat 12.1.1-4) , clang version 14.0.5 (Fedora 14.0.5-6.fc38)
>
> Is there a way to check if a "capability" is available for the
> attribute? Otherwise we can additionally check the clang version?
>
> For my tests I'll make clang 11.0 to be the oldest supported compiler
> (i.e. just disable building with older versions), but wanted to let you
> know since you try to check if the attribute is available and fallback
> to doing nothing in that case.
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/mutex.c | 2 ++
> > tools/perf/util/mutex.h | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mutex.c b/tools/perf/util/mutex.c
> > index 892294ac1769..ec813093276d 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/mutex.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/mutex.c
> > @@ -50,11 +50,13 @@ void mutex_destroy(struct mutex *mtx)
> > }
> >
> > void mutex_lock(struct mutex *mtx)
> > + NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS
> > {
> > CHECK_ERR(pthread_mutex_lock(&mtx->lock));
> > }
> >
> > void mutex_unlock(struct mutex *mtx)
> > + NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS
> > {
> > CHECK_ERR(pthread_mutex_unlock(&mtx->lock));
> > }
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mutex.h b/tools/perf/util/mutex.h
> > index c9e110a2b55e..48a2d87598f0 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/mutex.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/mutex.h
> > @@ -5,11 +5,73 @@
> > #include <pthread.h>
> > #include <stdbool.h>
> >
> > +/*
> > + * A function-like feature checking macro that is a wrapper around
> > + * `__has_attribute`, which is defined by GCC 5+ and Clang and evaluates to a
> > + * nonzero constant integer if the attribute is supported or 0 if not.
> > + */
> > +#ifdef __has_attribute
> > +#define HAVE_ATTRIBUTE(x) __has_attribute(x)
> > +#else
> > +#define HAVE_ATTRIBUTE(x) 0
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +
> > +#if HAVE_ATTRIBUTE(guarded_by) && HAVE_ATTRIBUTE(pt_guarded_by) && \
> > + HAVE_ATTRIBUTE(lockable) && HAVE_ATTRIBUTE(exclusive_lock_function) && \
> > + HAVE_ATTRIBUTE(exclusive_trylock_function) && HAVE_ATTRIBUTE(exclusive_locks_required) && \
> > + HAVE_ATTRIBUTE(no_thread_safety_analysis)
> > +
> > +/* Documents if a shared field or global variable needs to be protected by a mutex. */
> > +#define GUARDED_BY(x) __attribute__((guarded_by(x)))
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Documents if the memory location pointed to by a pointer should be guarded by
> > + * a mutex when dereferencing the pointer.
> > + */
> > +#define PT_GUARDED_BY(x) __attribute__((pt_guarded_by(x)))
> > +
> > +/* Documents if a type is a lockable type. */
> > +#define LOCKABLE __attribute__((capability("lockable")))
> > +
> > +/* Documents functions that acquire a lock in the body of a function, and do not release it. */
> > +#define EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION(...) __attribute__((exclusive_lock_function(__VA_ARGS__)))
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Documents functions that expect a lock to be held on entry to the function,
> > + * and release it in the body of the function.
> > + */
> > +#define UNLOCK_FUNCTION(...) __attribute__((unlock_function(__VA_ARGS__)))
> > +
> > +/* Documents functions that try to acquire a lock, and return success or failure. */
> > +#define EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION(...) \
> > + __attribute__((exclusive_trylock_function(__VA_ARGS__)))
> > +
> > +
> > +/* Documents a function that expects a mutex to be held prior to entry. */
> > +#define EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(...) __attribute__((exclusive_locks_required(__VA_ARGS__)))
> > +
> > +/* Turns off thread safety checking within the body of a particular function. */
> > +#define NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS __attribute__((no_thread_safety_analysis))
> > +
> > +#else
> > +
> > +#define GUARDED_BY(x)
> > +#define PT_GUARDED_BY(x)
> > +#define LOCKABLE
> > +#define EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION(...)
> > +#define UNLOCK_FUNCTION(...)
> > +#define EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION(...)
> > +#define EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(...)
> > +#define NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS
> > +
> > +#endif
> > +
> > /*
> > * A wrapper around the mutex implementation that allows perf to error check
> > * usage, etc.
> > */
> > -struct mutex {
> > +struct LOCKABLE mutex {
> > pthread_mutex_t lock;
> > };
> >
> > @@ -27,9 +89,9 @@ void mutex_init(struct mutex *mtx);
> > void mutex_init_pshared(struct mutex *mtx);
> > void mutex_destroy(struct mutex *mtx);
> >
> > -void mutex_lock(struct mutex *mtx);
> > -void mutex_unlock(struct mutex *mtx);
> > -bool mutex_trylock(struct mutex *mtx);
> > +void mutex_lock(struct mutex *mtx) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION(*mtx);
> > +void mutex_unlock(struct mutex *mtx) UNLOCK_FUNCTION(*mtx);
> > +bool mutex_trylock(struct mutex *mtx) EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION(true, *mtx);
> >
> > /* Default initialize the cond struct. */
> > void cond_init(struct cond *cnd);
> > @@ -40,7 +102,7 @@ void cond_init(struct cond *cnd);
> > void cond_init_pshared(struct cond *cnd);
> > void cond_destroy(struct cond *cnd);
> >
> > -void cond_wait(struct cond *cnd, struct mutex *mtx);
> > +void cond_wait(struct cond *cnd, struct mutex *mtx) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(mtx);
> > void cond_signal(struct cond *cnd);
> > void cond_broadcast(struct cond *cnd);
> >
> > --
> > 2.37.2.609.g9ff673ca1a-goog
>
> --
>
> - Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-26 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-24 15:38 [PATCH v3 00/18] Mutex wrapper, locking and memory leak fixes Ian Rogers
2022-08-24 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 01/18] perf mutex: Wrapped usage of mutex and cond Ian Rogers
2022-08-26 8:49 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-08-24 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 02/18] perf bench: Update use of pthread mutex/cond Ian Rogers
2022-08-24 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 03/18] perf tests: Avoid pthread.h inclusion Ian Rogers
2022-08-24 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 04/18] perf hist: Update use of pthread mutex Ian Rogers
2022-08-24 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 05/18] perf bpf: Remove unused pthread.h include Ian Rogers
2022-08-24 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 06/18] perf lock: " Ian Rogers
2022-08-24 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 07/18] perf record: Update use of pthread mutex Ian Rogers
2022-08-24 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 08/18] perf sched: " Ian Rogers
2022-08-24 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 09/18] perf ui: " Ian Rogers
2022-08-26 10:11 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-08-26 16:01 ` Ian Rogers
2022-08-26 10:24 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-08-26 16:02 ` Ian Rogers
2022-08-26 17:22 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-08-26 17:45 ` Ian Rogers
2022-08-26 18:52 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-08-26 19:00 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-08-26 19:20 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-08-26 20:40 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-08-26 20:52 ` Ian Rogers
2022-08-27 7:11 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-08-24 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 10/18] perf mmap: Remove unnecessary pthread.h include Ian Rogers
2022-08-24 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 11/18] perf dso: Update use of pthread mutex Ian Rogers
2022-08-26 10:37 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-08-26 16:05 ` Ian Rogers
2022-08-26 17:34 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-08-26 17:46 ` Ian Rogers
2022-08-24 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 12/18] perf annotate: " Ian Rogers
2022-08-24 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 13/18] perf top: " Ian Rogers
2022-08-24 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 14/18] perf dso: Hold lock when accessing nsinfo Ian Rogers
2022-08-24 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 15/18] perf mutex: Add thread safety annotations Ian Rogers
2022-08-26 11:12 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-08-26 16:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-08-26 17:00 ` Ian Rogers [this message]
2022-08-26 19:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-08-24 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 16/18] perf sched: Fixes for thread safety analysis Ian Rogers
2022-08-26 12:12 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-08-26 16:06 ` Ian Rogers
2022-08-26 17:41 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-08-26 17:48 ` Ian Rogers
2022-08-26 18:26 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-08-26 19:35 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-08-26 20:48 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-08-24 15:39 ` [PATCH v3 17/18] perf top: " Ian Rogers
2022-08-24 15:39 ` [PATCH v3 18/18] perf build: Enable -Wthread-safety with clang Ian Rogers
[not found] ` <CA+JHD906M0truH7wPNZ=eJwdCA=qLhYDonUx_ZQBwJYpiX1hNg@mail.gmail.com>
2022-08-25 16:14 ` [PATCH v3 00/18] Mutex wrapper, locking and memory leak fixes Adrian Hunter
2022-08-26 12:36 ` Adrian Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAP-5=fU0Kc+ZhVBXWz1zup1wFGUf8EOyaRREmfXDfD+hGGoL6w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=irogers@google.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.truong@arm.com \
--cc=alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=andres@anarazel.de \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenzechuan1@huawei.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=colin.king@intel.com \
--cc=dario.pk1@gmail.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=gpavithrasha@gmail.com \
--cc=hewenliang4@huawei.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuwenyu7@huawei.com \
--cc=liwg06@foxmail.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mliska@suse.cz \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=quentin@isovalent.com \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=rbernon@codeweavers.com \
--cc=rickyman7@gmail.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=wangborong@cdjrlc.com \
--cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
--cc=yaowenbin1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).