linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Why isn't the augmented_raw_syscalls functionality included in `perf trace` by default?
@ 2022-06-15 16:44 Kyle Huey
  2022-06-15 17:16 ` Ian Rogers
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kyle Huey @ 2022-06-15 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo; +Cc: linux-perf-users

Printing of filenames especially is a massive improvement over the
output of plain `perf trace`.  Is there a reason this isn't included
in the main `perf trace` command?

- Kyle

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-17 19:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-15 16:44 Why isn't the augmented_raw_syscalls functionality included in `perf trace` by default? Kyle Huey
2022-06-15 17:16 ` Ian Rogers
2022-06-17 19:20   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-06-17 19:45     ` Ian Rogers

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).