From: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf stat: Additional verbose details for <not supported> events
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 09:31:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fUqYeaE_P3ApXvq7j9SRuNXpLf+mK-4XBsvv2R=OTccbQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aOYkRdU5pn_jTOq3@google.com>
On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 1:43 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2025 at 11:14:21AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > If an event shows as "<not supported>" in perf stat output, in verbose
> > mode add the strerror output to help diagnose the issue.
> >
> > Consider:
> > ```
> > $ perf stat -e cycles,data_read,instructions true
> >
> > Performance counter stats for 'true':
> >
> > 357,457 cycles:u
> > <not supported> MiB data_read:u
> > 156,182 instructions:u # 0.44 insn per cycle
> >
> > 0.001250315 seconds time elapsed
> >
> > 0.001283000 seconds user
> > 0.000000000 seconds sys
> > ```
> >
> > To understand why the data_read uncore event failed, with this change:
> > ```
> > $ perf stat -v -e cycles,data_read,instructions true
> > Using CPUID GenuineIntel-6-8D-1
> > cycles -> cpu/cycles/
> > data_read -> uncore_imc_free_running_0/data_read/
> > data_read -> uncore_imc_free_running_1/data_read/
> > instructions -> cpu/instructions/
> > Control descriptor is not initialized
> > Warning:
> > kernel.perf_event_paranoid=2, trying to fall back to excluding kernel and hypervisor samples
> > Warning:
> > kernel.perf_event_paranoid=2, trying to fall back to excluding kernel and hypervisor samples
> > Warning:
> > kernel.perf_event_paranoid=2, trying to fall back to excluding kernel and hypervisor samples
> > Warning:
> > data_read:u event is not supported by the kernel.
> > Invalid event (data_read:u) in per-thread mode, enable system wide with '-a'.
> > Warning:
> > kernel.perf_event_paranoid=2, trying to fall back to excluding kernel and hypervisor samples
> > Warning:
> > data_read:u event is not supported by the kernel.
> > Invalid event (data_read:u) in per-thread mode, enable system wide with '-a'.
> > cycles:u: 351621 362833 362833
> > failed to read counter data_read:u
> > failed to read counter data_read:u
> > instructions:u: 156184 362833 362833
> >
> > Performance counter stats for 'true':
> >
> > 351,621 cycles:u
> > <not supported> MiB data_read:u
> > 156,184 instructions:u # 0.44 insn per cycle
> >
> > 0.001584472 seconds time elapsed
> >
> > 0.001811000 seconds user
> > 0.000000000 seconds sys
> > ```
> > where without this change only "data_read:u event is not supported by
> > the kernel." is shown.
>
> I think what you say is:
>
> Before:
> data_read:u event is not supported by the kernel.
>
> After:
> data_read:u event is not supported by the kernel.
> Invalid event (data_read:u) in per-thread mode, enable system wide with '-a'.
I kept things verbose as unfortunately the
"kernel.perf_event_paranoid=2" is important as is the use of
per-thread mode. Different paranoia levels lead to different errors
and unfortunately a lot of the time the error gets reported as "
data_read:u event is not supported by the kernel." and I'm not sure
all users will get that the key part there is the :u modifier.
However, fixing evsel__open_strerror wasn't in scope for this change.
Thanks,
Ian
> Off-topic, it'd be great if we reduce the number of the same warning
> messages. I think the data_read is from two uncore PMUs so the message
> was repeated. If we can connect the related evsels and show the
> messages once, then the output is more readable. Maybe we also want to
> show the fallback message just once (globally).
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 12 +++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > index 7006f848f87a..84e06ec09cc2 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > @@ -624,8 +624,9 @@ static enum counter_recovery stat_handle_error(struct evsel *counter, int err)
> > */
> > if (err == EINVAL || err == ENOSYS || err == ENOENT || err == ENXIO) {
> > if (verbose > 0) {
> > - ui__warning("%s event is not supported by the kernel.\n",
> > - evsel__name(counter));
> > + evsel__open_strerror(counter, &target, err, msg, sizeof(msg));
> > + ui__warning("%s event is not supported by the kernel.\n%s\n",
> > + evsel__name(counter), msg);
> > }
> > return COUNTER_SKIP;
> > }
> > @@ -649,10 +650,11 @@ static enum counter_recovery stat_handle_error(struct evsel *counter, int err)
> > }
> > }
> > if (verbose > 0) {
> > + evsel__open_strerror(counter, &target, err, msg, sizeof(msg));
> > ui__warning(err == EOPNOTSUPP
> > - ? "%s event is not supported by the kernel.\n"
> > - : "skipping event %s that kernel failed to open.\n",
> > - evsel__name(counter));
> > + ? "%s event is not supported by the kernel.\n%s\n"
> > + : "skipping event %s that kernel failed to open.\n%s\n",
> > + evsel__name(counter), msg);
> > }
> > return COUNTER_SKIP;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.51.0.618.g983fd99d29-goog
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-08 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-05 18:14 [PATCH v1] perf stat: Additional verbose details for <not supported> events Ian Rogers
2025-10-08 8:43 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-10-08 16:31 ` Ian Rogers [this message]
2025-10-09 5:51 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-10-09 13:31 ` Ian Rogers
2025-10-14 14:04 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAP-5=fUqYeaE_P3ApXvq7j9SRuNXpLf+mK-4XBsvv2R=OTccbQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=irogers@google.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).