From: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tools subcmd: Add non-waitpid check_if_command_finished()
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 21:24:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fV4oPEjX2fh3aeBbmBGgYJGCdBnVjTZ2XnCCgnTSa0LTw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZoTETvgcPdl9EUJV@google.com>
On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 8:24 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 09:42:35PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Using waitpid can cause stdout/stderr of the child process to be
> > lost. Use Linux's /prod/<pid>/status file to determine if the process
> > has reached the zombie state. Use the 'status' file rather than 'stat'
> > to avoid issues around skipping the process name.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> > ---
> > tools/lib/subcmd/run-command.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/subcmd/run-command.c b/tools/lib/subcmd/run-command.c
> > index 4e3a557a2f37..ec06683e77a0 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/subcmd/run-command.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/subcmd/run-command.c
> > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> > #include <unistd.h>
> > #include <sys/types.h>
> > #include <sys/stat.h>
> > +#include <ctype.h>
> > #include <fcntl.h>
> > #include <string.h>
> > #include <linux/string.h>
> > @@ -217,8 +218,40 @@ static int wait_or_whine(struct child_process *cmd, bool block)
> >
> > int check_if_command_finished(struct child_process *cmd)
> > {
> > +#ifdef __linux__
>
> Is this really necessary? I don't think we plan to support other OS..
I don't think it'd be unreasonable to say run "perf report" on
Windows, or using wasm inside a web browser. Part of the reason for
doing things this way was to keep the WNOHANG logic although this
change no longer uses it for __linux__.
Thanks,
Ian
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
>
> > + char filename[FILENAME_MAX + 12];
> > + char status_line[256];
> > + FILE *status_file;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Check by reading /proc/<pid>/status as calling waitpid causes
> > + * stdout/stderr to be closed and data lost.
> > + */
> > + sprintf(filename, "/proc/%d/status", cmd->pid);
> > + status_file = fopen(filename, "r");
> > + if (status_file == NULL) {
> > + /* Open failed assume finish_command was called. */
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > + while (fgets(status_line, sizeof(status_line), status_file) != NULL) {
> > + char *p;
> > +
> > + if (strncmp(status_line, "State:", 6))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + fclose(status_file);
> > + p = status_line + 6;
> > + while (isspace(*p))
> > + p++;
> > + return *p == 'Z';
> > + }
> > + /* Read failed assume finish_command was called. */
> > + fclose(status_file);
> > + return true;
> > +#else
> > wait_or_whine(cmd, /*block=*/false);
> > return cmd->finished;
> > +#endif
> > }
> >
> > int finish_command(struct child_process *cmd)
> > --
> > 2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-03 4:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-01 4:42 [PATCH v2 0/2] perf test: Display remaining tests while waiting Ian Rogers
2024-07-01 4:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] tools subcmd: Add non-waitpid check_if_command_finished() Ian Rogers
2024-07-03 3:23 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-07-03 4:24 ` Ian Rogers [this message]
2024-07-12 20:33 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-07-12 21:19 ` Ian Rogers
2024-07-13 14:59 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-07-14 18:13 ` Ian Rogers
2024-07-01 4:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] perf test: Display number of remaining tests Ian Rogers
2024-07-03 3:39 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-07-03 4:30 ` Ian Rogers
2024-07-03 21:23 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAP-5=fV4oPEjX2fh3aeBbmBGgYJGCdBnVjTZ2XnCCgnTSa0LTw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=irogers@google.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).