linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@gmail.com>,
	Sohaib Mohamed <sohaib.amhmd@gmail.com>,
	Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] perf test: Skip reason for suites with 1 test
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 09:34:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fVA+x_sNuWCOMj9ASBpFanms8DkAvLkbs5URDvcBW1itg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6e28614-e348-b490-bf33-af5810a60722@huawei.com>

On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 9:26 AM John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On 13/05/2022 16:42, Ian Rogers wrote:
> >> I was not sure which suite has a single tastcase, so I experimented for
> >> libpfm4 by deleting a testcase so it has only 1x remaining, I get:
> >>
> >> before your change:
> >> john@localhost:~/acme/tools/perf> sudo ./perf test 63
> >> 63: Test libpfm4 support : Skip
> >>
> >> after:
> >>
> >> john@localhost:~/acme/tools/perf> sudo ./perf test 63
> >> 63: Test libpfm4 support : Skip (not compiled in)
> >>
> >> Although it is odd to have a single sub-test, is there a reason for
> >> which we don't print its name? We print the name when there are multiple
> >> sub-tests.
> > The reason was to replicate the existing "perf test" behavior before
> > the kunit style transition. The main place we get tests with a single
> > sub-test is from the DEFINE_SUITE macro:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/tests/tests.h?h=perf/core#n67
> > I agree it looks kind of weird and was inheriting the data structures
> > from kunit and the format of the output from perf test.
>
> Out of curiosity, which suite is this that you find only has a single
> subtest? Does it possibly only have a single subtest as some others may
> be compiled out?

I was getting it when I added a skip message to the openat syscall
tests in patch 3:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220513040519.1499333-4-irogers@google.com/

I didn't see any changes with any existing tests.

Thanks,
Ian

> Thanks,
> John

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-13 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-13  4:05 [PATCH 0/7] Make more tests skip rather than fail Ian Rogers
2022-05-13  4:05 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf test: Skip reason for suites with 1 test Ian Rogers
2022-05-13 15:29   ` John Garry
2022-05-13 15:42     ` Ian Rogers
2022-05-13 16:26       ` John Garry
2022-05-13 16:34         ` Ian Rogers [this message]
2022-05-13 16:46           ` John Garry
2022-05-17  3:53   ` Namhyung Kim
2022-05-13  4:05 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf test: Use skip in vmlinux kallsyms Ian Rogers
2022-05-13 17:01   ` John Garry
2022-05-13 17:05     ` Ian Rogers
2022-05-17  3:21   ` Namhyung Kim
2022-05-18  3:37     ` Ian Rogers
2022-05-13  4:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] perf test: Use skip in openat syscall Ian Rogers
2022-05-13  4:05 ` [PATCH 4/7] perf test: Basic mmap use skip Ian Rogers
2022-05-17  3:42   ` Namhyung Kim
2022-05-18  3:48     ` Ian Rogers
2022-05-13  4:05 ` [PATCH 5/7] perf test: Parse events tidy terms_test Ian Rogers
2022-05-13  4:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] perf test: Parse events tidy evlist_test Ian Rogers
2022-05-13  4:05 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf test: Parse events break apart tests Ian Rogers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAP-5=fVA+x_sNuWCOMj9ASBpFanms8DkAvLkbs5URDvcBW1itg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=carsten.haitzler@arm.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rickyman7@gmail.com \
    --cc=sohaib.amhmd@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).