linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
To: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	kernel@collabora.com,  Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/headers: Document PERF_PMU_CAP capability flags
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 13:14:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fW4VSEQm2AG+znK854H6rUz6i60NKjJCybJ+6N5fEZFQA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250618-perf-pmu-cap-docs-v1-1-0d34387d6e47@collabora.com>

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 12:09 PM Nicolas Frattaroli
<nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> Over the years, capability flags for perf PMUs were introduced in a
> piecemeal fashion whenever a new driver needed to signal to the perf
> core some limitation or special feature.
>
> Since one more undocumented flag that can have its meaning inferred from
> the commit message and implementation never seems that bad, it's
> understandable that this resulted in a total of 11 undocumented
> capability flags, which authors of new perf PMU drivers are expected to
> set correctly for their particular device.
>
> Since I am in the process of becoming such an author of a new perf
> driver, it feels proper to pay it forward by documenting all
> PERF_PMU_CAP_ constants, so that no future person has to go through an
> hour or two of git blame + reading perf core code to figure out which
> capability flags are right for them.
>
> Add comments in kernel-doc format that describes each flag. This follows
> the somewhat verbose "Object-like macro documentation" format, and can
> be verified with
>
>         ./scripts/kernel-doc -v -none include/linux/perf_event.h
>
> The current in-tree kernel documentation does not include a page on the
> perf subsystem, but once it does, these comments should render as proper
> documentation annotation. Until then, they'll also be quite useful for
> anyone looking at the header file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>

Thanks for taking the effort to do this!

Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>

Thanks,
Ian

> ---
> There may be more perf documentation patches in the future, but right
> now I'm focused on getting a minimally viable driver for the hardware
> I'm working on going. Documenting these seemed to have a fairly good
> effort-to-future-payoff ratio though.
>
> I Cc'd Corbet in case he has any input on the verbosity of the
> kernel-doc syntax here, maybe I'm missing something and all of these
> could be in a single /* comment */, but as it is in this patch doesn't
> seem too awful to me either.
> ---
>  include/linux/perf_event.h | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index ec9d96025683958e909bb2463439dc69634f4ceb..7d749fd5225be12543df6e475277563bf16c05b1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -294,16 +294,90 @@ struct perf_event_pmu_context;
>  /**
>   * pmu::capabilities flags
>   */
> +
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT - \
> + *    PMU is incapable of generating hardware interrupts
> + */
>  #define PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT      0x0001
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_NMI - \
> + *    PMU is guaranteed to not generate non-maskable interrupts
> + */
>  #define PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_NMI            0x0002
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_NO_SG - \
> + *    PMU does not support using scatter-gather as the output
> + *
> + * The PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_NO_SG flag indicates that the PMU does not support
> + * scatter-gather for its output buffer, and needs a larger contiguous buffer
> + * to output to.
> + */
>  #define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_NO_SG         0x0004
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS - \
> + *    PMU is capable of sampling extended registers
> + *
> + * Some architectures have a concept of extended registers, e.g. XMM0 on x86
> + * or VG on arm64. If the PMU is capable of sampling these registers, then the
> + * flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS should be set.
> + */
>  #define PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS     0x0008
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE - \
> + *    PMU can only have one scheduled event at a time
> + *
> + * Certain PMU hardware cannot track several events at the same time. Such
> + * hardware must set PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE in order to avoid conflicts.
> + */
>  #define PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE         0x0010
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_ITRACE - PMU traces instructions
> + *
> + * Some PMU hardware does instruction tracing, in that it traces execution of
> + * each instruction. Setting this capability flag makes the perf core generate
> + * a %PERF_RECORD_ITRACE_START event, recording the profiled task's PID and TID,
> + * to allow tools to properly decode such traces.
> + */
>  #define PERF_PMU_CAP_ITRACE            0x0020
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE - \
> + *    PMU is incapable of excluding events based on context
> + *
> + * Some PMU hardware will count events regardless of context, including e.g.
> + * idle, kernel and guest. Drivers for such hardware should set the
> + * PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE flag to explicitly advertise that they're unable to
> + * help themselves, so that the perf core can reject requests to exclude events
> + * based on context.
> + */
>  #define PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE                0x0040
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT - PMU non-AUX events generate AUX data
> + *
> + * Drivers for PMU hardware that supports non-AUX events which generate data for
> + * AUX events should set PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT. This flag tells the perf core
> + * to schedule non-AUX events together with AUX events, so that this data isn't
> + * lost.
> + */
>  #define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT                0x0080
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE - \
> + *    PMU supports PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE and PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE
> + */
>  #define PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE  0x0100
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_PAUSE - \
> + *    PMU can pause and resume AUX area traces based on events
> + */
>  #define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_PAUSE         0x0200
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_PREFER_LARGE - PMU prefers contiguous output buffers
> + *
> + * The PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_PREFER_LARGE capability flag is a less strict variant of
> + * %PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_NO_SG. PMU drivers for hardware that doesn't strictly
> + * require contiguous output buffers, but find the benefits outweigh the
> + * downside of increased memory fragmentation, may set this capability flag.
> + */
>  #define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_PREFER_LARGE  0x0400
>
>  /**
>
> ---
> base-commit: 31d56636e10e92ced06ead14b7541867f955e41d
> change-id: 20250618-perf-pmu-cap-docs-a13e4ae939ac
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-18 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-18 19:08 [PATCH] perf/headers: Document PERF_PMU_CAP capability flags Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-06-18 20:14 ` Ian Rogers [this message]
2025-06-19 14:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-19 16:06   ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-06-20  8:04     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-20  9:14 ` James Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAP-5=fW4VSEQm2AG+znK854H6rUz6i60NKjJCybJ+6N5fEZFQA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).