From: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <sesse@google.com>,
Qi Liu <liuqi115@huawei.com>, Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
Florian Fischer <florian.fischer@muhq.space>,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Suzuki Poulouse <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] perf record: Early auxtrace initialization before event parsing
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 13:22:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fXJ7zDvb9h+yT+o1qDPT9znsuaey0Ym=RJGtzvYJG8roA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a39b7055-3fde-b351-89af-525d4f5ccee6@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 12:32 PM Liang, Kan <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2023-03-08 3:17 a.m., Ian Rogers wrote:
> > This allows event parsing to use the evsel__is_aux_event function,
> > which is important when determining event grouping.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/arch/x86/util/auxtrace.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> > tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 6 ++++++
> > tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h | 2 ++
> > 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/auxtrace.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/auxtrace.c
> > index 3da506e13f49..de1e4842ea2e 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/auxtrace.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/auxtrace.c
> > @@ -15,6 +15,19 @@
> > #include "../../../util/intel-bts.h"
> > #include "../../../util/evlist.h"
> >
> > +void auxtrace__early_init(void)
> > +{
> > + struct perf_pmu *intel_pt_pmu;
> > + struct perf_pmu *intel_bts_pmu;
> > +
> > + intel_pt_pmu = perf_pmu__find(INTEL_PT_PMU_NAME);
> > + if (intel_pt_pmu)
> > + intel_pt_pmu->auxtrace = true;
> > + intel_bts_pmu = perf_pmu__find(INTEL_BTS_PMU_NAME);
> > + if (intel_bts_pmu)
> > + intel_bts_pmu->auxtrace = true;
> > +}
> > +
> > static
> > struct auxtrace_record *auxtrace_record__init_intel(struct evlist *evlist,
> > int *err)
> > @@ -26,11 +39,7 @@ struct auxtrace_record *auxtrace_record__init_intel(struct evlist *evlist,
> > bool found_bts = false;
> >
> > intel_pt_pmu = perf_pmu__find(INTEL_PT_PMU_NAME);
> > - if (intel_pt_pmu)
> > - intel_pt_pmu->auxtrace = true;
> > intel_bts_pmu = perf_pmu__find(INTEL_BTS_PMU_NAME);
> > - if (intel_bts_pmu)
> > - intel_bts_pmu->auxtrace = true;
> >
> > evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, evsel) {
> > if (intel_pt_pmu && evsel->core.attr.type == intel_pt_pmu->type)
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > index 8374117e66f6..a0870c076dc0 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > @@ -3940,6 +3940,10 @@ static int record__init_thread_masks(struct record *rec)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +__weak void auxtrace__early_init(void)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
>
> Does the method which Adrian suggested work for you?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/9788f0f1-087f-7f0b-048a-0146afe1f632@intel.com/
>
> With that, we don't need to introduce another weak function.
>
> Thanks,
> Kan
Thanks Kan,
that works and I'm not sure how I missed Adrian's e-mail. I'll put it into v4.
Ian
>
> > int cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv)
> > {
> > int err;
> > @@ -3985,6 +3989,8 @@ int cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv)
> > if (err)
> > return err;
> >
> > + auxtrace__early_init();
> > +
> > argc = parse_options(argc, argv, record_options, record_usage,
> > PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
> > if (quiet)
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h
> > index 29eb82dff574..49a86aa6ac94 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h
> > @@ -457,6 +457,8 @@ struct addr_filters {
> >
> > struct auxtrace_cache;
> >
> > +void auxtrace__early_init(void);
> > +
> > #ifdef HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT
> >
> > u64 compat_auxtrace_mmap__read_head(struct auxtrace_mmap *mm);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-08 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-08 8:17 [PATCH v3 00/11] Better fixes for grouping of events Ian Rogers
2023-03-08 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] libperf evlist: Avoid a use of evsel idx Ian Rogers
2023-03-08 12:24 ` John Garry
2023-03-08 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] perf stat: Don't remove all grouped events when CPU maps disagree Ian Rogers
2023-03-08 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] perf record: Early auxtrace initialization before event parsing Ian Rogers
2023-03-08 20:32 ` Liang, Kan
2023-03-08 21:22 ` Ian Rogers [this message]
2023-03-08 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] perf stat: Modify the group test Ian Rogers
2023-03-08 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] perf evsel: Allow const evsel for certain accesses Ian Rogers
2023-03-08 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] perf evsel: Add function to compute group PMU name Ian Rogers
2023-03-08 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] perf parse-events: Pass ownership of the group name Ian Rogers
2023-03-08 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] perf parse-events: Sort and group parsed events Ian Rogers
2023-03-08 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] perf evsel: Remove use_uncore_alias Ian Rogers
2023-03-08 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] perf evlist: Remove nr_groups Ian Rogers
2023-03-08 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] perf parse-events: Warn when events are regrouped Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAP-5=fXJ7zDvb9h+yT+o1qDPT9znsuaey0Ym=RJGtzvYJG8roA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=irogers@google.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=florian.fischer@muhq.space \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuqi115@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sesse@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).