From: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
To: weilin.wang@intel.com
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Perry Taylor <perry.taylor@intel.com>,
Samantha Alt <samantha.alt@intel.com>,
Caleb Biggers <caleb.biggers@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 09/16] perf stat: Add function to handle special events in hardware-grouping
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 23:12:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fXtfu4Kvz0xKA3uxwvmZCacCmYPyP9Pa6dWFF8L_ZTcLg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240412210756.309828-10-weilin.wang@intel.com>
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 2:08 PM <weilin.wang@intel.com> wrote:
>
> From: Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@intel.com>
>
> There are some special events like topdown events and TSC that are not
> described in pmu-event JSON files. Add support to handle this type of
> events. This should be considered as a temporary solution because including
> these events in JSON files would be a better solution.
What is going to happen in other cases uncore, software and core
events for other architectures? Topdown is annoyingly special but the
MSR events should be similar to tool events like duration_time, in
that they don't have grouping restrictions.
Thanks,
Ian
>
> Signed-off-by: Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@intel.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> index 04d988ace734..681aacc15787 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> @@ -162,6 +162,20 @@ struct metric {
>
> /* Maximum number of counters per PMU*/
> #define NR_COUNTERS 16
> +/* Special events that are not described in pmu-event JSON files.
> + * topdown-* and TSC use dedicated registers, set as free
> + * counter for grouping purpose
> + */
> +enum special_events {
> + TOPDOWN = 0,
> + TSC = 1,
> + SPECIAL_EVENT_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +static const char *const special_event_names[SPECIAL_EVENT_MAX] = {
> + "topdown-",
> + "TSC",
> +};
>
> /**
> * An event used in a metric. This info is for metric grouping.
> @@ -2142,6 +2156,15 @@ static int create_grouping(struct list_head *pmu_info_list,
> return ret;
> };
>
> +static bool is_special_event(const char *id)
> +{
> + for (int i = 0; i < SPECIAL_EVENT_MAX; i++) {
> + if (!strncmp(id, special_event_names[i], strlen(special_event_names[i])))
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * hw_aware_build_grouping - Build event groupings by reading counter
> * requirement of the events and counter available on the system from
> @@ -2166,6 +2189,17 @@ static int hw_aware_build_grouping(struct expr_parse_ctx *ctx __maybe_unused,
> hashmap__for_each_entry(ctx->ids, cur, bkt) {
> const char *id = cur->pkey;
>
> + if (is_special_event(id)) {
> + struct metricgroup__event_info *event;
> +
> + event = event_info__new(id, "default_core", "0",
> + /*free_counter=*/true);
> + if (!event)
> + goto err_out;
> +
> + list_add(&event->nd, &event_info_list);
> + continue;
> + }
> ret = get_metricgroup_events(id, etable, &event_info_list);
> if (ret)
> goto err_out;
> @@ -2636,8 +2670,10 @@ int metricgroup__parse_groups(struct evlist *perf_evlist,
> ret = hw_aware_parse_groups(perf_evlist, pmu, str,
> metric_no_threshold, user_requested_cpu_list, system_wide,
> /*fake_pmu=*/NULL, metric_events, table);
> - if (!ret)
> + if (!ret) {
> + pr_info("Hardware aware grouping completed\n");
> return 0;
> + }
> }
>
> return parse_groups(perf_evlist, pmu, str, metric_no_group, metric_no_merge,
> --
> 2.42.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-17 6:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-12 21:07 [RFC PATCH v5 00/16] Perf stat metric grouping with hardware information weilin.wang
2024-04-12 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 01/16] perf stat: Add new field in stat_config to enable hardware aware grouping weilin.wang
2024-04-17 3:49 ` Ian Rogers
2024-04-17 16:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-04-12 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 02/16] perf stat: Add basic functions for the " weilin.wang
2024-04-17 4:56 ` Ian Rogers
2024-04-17 16:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-04-12 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 03/16] perf pmu-events: Add functions in jevent.py to parse counter and event info for " weilin.wang
2024-04-17 5:42 ` Ian Rogers
2024-04-12 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 04/16] find_bit: add _find_last_and_bit() to support finding the most significant set bit weilin.wang
2024-04-12 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 05/16] perf stat: Add functions to set counter bitmaps for hardware-grouping method weilin.wang
2024-04-17 5:35 ` Ian Rogers
2024-04-12 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 06/16] perf stat: Add functions to get counter info weilin.wang
2024-04-12 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 07/16] perf stat: Add functions to create new group and assign events into groups weilin.wang
2024-04-12 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 08/16] perf stat: Add build string function and topdown events handling in hardware-grouping weilin.wang
2024-04-17 5:56 ` Ian Rogers
2024-04-12 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 09/16] perf stat: Add function to handle special events " weilin.wang
2024-04-17 6:12 ` Ian Rogers [this message]
2024-04-12 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 10/16] perf stat: Add function to combine metrics for hardware-grouping weilin.wang
2024-04-12 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 11/16] perf stat: Add partial support on MSR in hardware-grouping weilin.wang
2024-04-12 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 12/16] perf stat: Handle NMI " weilin.wang
2024-04-12 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 13/16] perf stat: Code refactoring " weilin.wang
2024-04-12 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 14/16] perf stat: Add tool events support " weilin.wang
2024-04-12 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 15/16] perf stat: use tool event helper function in metricgroup__build_event_string weilin.wang
2024-04-17 6:36 ` Ian Rogers
2024-04-12 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 16/16] perf stat: Add hardware-grouping cmd option to perf stat weilin.wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAP-5=fXtfu4Kvz0xKA3uxwvmZCacCmYPyP9Pa6dWFF8L_ZTcLg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=irogers@google.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=caleb.biggers@intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=perry.taylor@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=samantha.alt@intel.com \
--cc=weilin.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).