linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf test: Skip sigtrap test on old kernels
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 22:58:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW4OT3XC8oREZBNreesYyVvU9hSGs5Hgz=r-cwsQSkiXRQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220907050407.2711513-1-namhyung@kernel.org>

On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 10:04 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> If it runs on an old kernel, perf_event_open would fail because of the
> new fields sigtrap and sig_data.  Just skipping the test could miss an
> actual bug in the kernel.
>
> Let's check BTF if it has the perf_event_attr.sigtrap field.
>
> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/sigtrap.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sigtrap.c b/tools/perf/tests/sigtrap.c
> index e32ece90e164..32f08ce0f2b0 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/sigtrap.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/sigtrap.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
>  #include <sys/syscall.h>
>  #include <unistd.h>
>
> +#include <bpf/btf.h>
> +

Do we need "#ifdef HAVE_BPF_SKEL" for the include part?

Other than this, looks good to me.

Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>

>  #include "cloexec.h"
>  #include "debug.h"
>  #include "event.h"
> @@ -54,6 +56,42 @@ static struct perf_event_attr make_event_attr(void)
>         return attr;
>  }
>
> +static bool attr_has_sigtrap(void)
> +{
> +       bool ret = false;
> +
> +#ifdef HAVE_BPF_SKEL
> +
> +       struct btf *btf;
> +       const struct btf_type *t;
> +       const struct btf_member *m;
> +       const char *name;
> +       int i, id;
> +
> +       /* just assume it doesn't have the field */
> +       btf = btf__load_vmlinux_btf();
> +       if (btf == NULL)
> +               return false;
> +
> +       id = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, "perf_event_attr", BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
> +       if (id < 0)
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       t = btf__type_by_id(btf, id);
> +       for (i = 0, m = btf_members(t); i < btf_vlen(t); i++, m++) {
> +               name = btf__name_by_offset(btf, m->name_off);
> +               if (!strcmp(name, "sigtrap")) {
> +                       ret = true;
> +                       break;
> +               }
> +       }
> +out:
> +       btf__free(btf);
> +#endif
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static void
>  sigtrap_handler(int signum __maybe_unused, siginfo_t *info, void *ucontext __maybe_unused)
>  {
> @@ -139,7 +177,13 @@ static int test__sigtrap(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __m
>
>         fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1, perf_event_open_cloexec_flag());
>         if (fd < 0) {
> -               pr_debug("FAILED sys_perf_event_open(): %s\n", str_error_r(errno, sbuf, sizeof(sbuf)));
> +               if (attr_has_sigtrap()) {
> +                       pr_debug("FAILED sys_perf_event_open(): %s\n",
> +                                str_error_r(errno, sbuf, sizeof(sbuf)));
> +               } else {
> +                       pr_debug("perf_event_attr doesn't have sigtrap\n");
> +                       ret = TEST_SKIP;
> +               }
>                 goto out_restore_sigaction;
>         }
>
> --
> 2.37.2.789.g6183377224-goog
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-07  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-07  5:04 [PATCH v2] perf test: Skip sigtrap test on old kernels Namhyung Kim
2022-09-07  5:58 ` Song Liu [this message]
2022-09-07  6:58   ` Namhyung Kim
2022-09-07  8:32 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-09-07 17:50   ` Namhyung Kim
2022-09-07 18:05     ` Namhyung Kim
2022-09-08 18:31 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPhsuW4OT3XC8oREZBNreesYyVvU9hSGs5Hgz=r-cwsQSkiXRQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).