From: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] perf script: Fix perf script -F +metric
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 23:32:37 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DA123DCE-7607-45A8-987B-34F42B3D9E7B@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240713155443.1665378-1-ak@linux.intel.com>
> On 13 Jul 2024, at 9:24 PM, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> This fixes a regression with perf script -F +metric originally caused by :
>
> commit 37cc8ad77cf81f3ffd226856c367b0e15333a738
> Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> Date: Sun Feb 19 01:28:46 2023 -0800
>
> perf metric: Directly use counts rather than saved_value
>
> In the perf script environment the evsel wouldn't allocate an aggr
> values array, which led to a -1 reference because the metric
> evaluation would try to reference NULL - 1 (for aggr_idx)
>
> Give the perf script evsels a single CPU aggr setup. That's
> enough because the groups are always contiguous, so no need
> to store more than one CPU's worth of values.
>
> Before
>
> % perf record -e '{cycles,instructions}:S' perf bench mem memcpy
> % perf script -F +metric
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> After:
>
> % perf record -e '{cycles,instructions}:S' perf bench mem memcpy
> ...
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.028 MB perf.data (90 samples) ]
> % perf script -F +metric
> perf-exec 1847557 264658.180789: 3009 cycles: ffffffff990a579a native_write_msr+0xa ([kernel.kallsyms])
> perf-exec 1847557 264658.180789: 382 instructions: ffffffff990a579a native_write_msr+0xa ([kernel.kallsyms])
> perf-exec 1847557 264658.180789: metric: 0.13 insn per cycle
> ...
>
> Fixes: 37cc8ad77cf8 ("perf metric: Directly use counts rather ...")
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Hi Andi,
I tested this on powerpc. It fails.
Version 4 had worked for me. But version 5 fails with segfault
# ./perf record -e '{cycles,instructions}:S' perf bench mem memcpy
# Running 'mem/memcpy' benchmark:
# function 'default' (Default memcpy() provided by glibc)
# Copying 1MB bytes ...
25.699013 GB/sec
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.012 MB perf.data (24 samples) ]
# ./perf script -F +metric
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Adding results from perf test also:
# ./perf test -v "perf script tests”
script metric test
[ perf record: Woken up 2 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.379 MB /tmp/perf-test-script.6I9EykwokH/perf.data (8050 samples) ]
/linux/tools/perf/tests/shell/script.sh: line 93: 2280279 Segmentation fault (core dumped) perf script -i "${perfdatafile}" -F +metric > $scriptoutput
--- Cleaning up ---
---- end(-1) ----
93: perf script tests : FAILED!
I am trying on top of tmp.perf-tools-next acme tree
# git log --oneline -n 2
7f1c0c721699 (HEAD -> try) Add a test case for perf script -F +metric
cadd820159b3 perf script: Fix perf script -F +metric
Thanks
Athira
>
> ----
>
> v2: Reformat code
> v3: Work around bogus warning
> v4: Set up aggr map only for metrics case to keep perf stat record
> working
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> index c16224b1fef3..33b5c7af5071 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> @@ -2127,23 +2127,29 @@ static void perf_sample__fprint_metric(struct perf_script *script,
> };
> struct evsel *ev2;
> u64 val;
> + struct cpu_aggr_map *map;
>
> if (!evsel->stats)
> evlist__alloc_stats(&stat_config, script->session->evlist, /*alloc_raw=*/false);
> if (evsel_script(leader)->gnum++ == 0)
> perf_stat__reset_shadow_stats();
> val = sample->period * evsel->scale;
> + map = stat_config.aggr_map;
> + stat_config.aggr_map = &(struct cpu_aggr_map){ .nr = 1 };
> + /* Always use CPU 0 storage because the groups are contiguous. */
> + evsel->stats->aggr[0].counts.val = val;
> evsel_script(evsel)->val = val;
> if (evsel_script(leader)->gnum == leader->core.nr_members) {
> for_each_group_member (ev2, leader) {
> perf_stat__print_shadow_stats(&stat_config, ev2,
> evsel_script(ev2)->val,
> - sample->cpu,
> + 0,
> &ctx,
> NULL);
> }
> evsel_script(leader)->gnum = 0;
> }
> + stat_config.aggr_map = map;
> }
>
> static bool show_event(struct perf_sample *sample,
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-13 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-13 15:54 [PATCH v5 1/2] perf script: Fix perf script -F +metric Andi Kleen
2024-07-13 15:54 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] Add a test case for " Andi Kleen
2024-07-13 18:02 ` Athira Rajeev [this message]
2024-07-16 3:33 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] perf script: Fix " Andi Kleen
2024-07-16 5:58 ` Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DA123DCE-7607-45A8-987B-34F42B3D9E7B@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).