From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96656C433EF for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 17:47:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231909AbiGCRrG (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jul 2022 13:47:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33126 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229549AbiGCRrF (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jul 2022 13:47:05 -0400 Received: from mail-oa1-x2f.google.com (mail-oa1-x2f.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::2f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDD0C5587; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 10:47:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oa1-x2f.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-fe023ab520so10318135fac.10; Sun, 03 Jul 2022 10:47:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jcDULdfwj57RqmfboKaVRHoy92XsNiPDdj230BX3SXM=; b=F547fVI/SUbdG2s1x4Jq1gDFvisVCNF32MqWJcCk/7Xi0vtOenrZ9UYB1xThBQEqb3 VYr7y0Bp2dylwGK1mcfv84LhCrtny57e7qveYjuY7SC7A4cr1ygaD3Mg4SF8SL8YhCI3 6PT5G4Kji0VQWeK9x+lsZNuoQHu8IP/85ZvtwYib2e2jHiawumsUQ64mkj5jH7hl/sdg g3C2jvjJl3bvTBCjUQ0ACtr308CNmPBsY8MGL0BV1DRhHBMTvjmyBqMUwYNdIiH0Ue24 HUFMQK1YsnFL7xmIGQDPVmD/SgB10OdnZfVbP2YHzAQXno9pQ2rIsLDB7QrvQXr4BFKq R23g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jcDULdfwj57RqmfboKaVRHoy92XsNiPDdj230BX3SXM=; b=gTqwNqoMJGi0cCqHMP99qcsCQJCs3atgTEPuLDJBr0WTc7bmxxmDrBD7rVBQOUvYA/ rvIyTRH0J2Zuz3hSZFVT/6r1t9Ot31es9c2orjUK3F0dsSbfvxZCuaSzvSBp7iZRVlWc 8J8bK0ICSfR7RzV7ii32KvYQJjOJFZw99ivG2o01xjDLuWo+ILBQQ6OlFjG3bIAKB55+ uYQcX52mwj7ev40W8LDeqaaaUbW61SvUcoQH70h5XUb+ds1eEdmd4/9XXHCKNHZGqvXO HK4U0telks5DmoIJz3ui74fuaX6L2ouzWJF1QNMleeDgVXfZo+eZFrmwdo35ziKGkh0U nT8A== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/AGADJX1joRtYF1wYhTmqQiJK6Z0vO+0v33jz0YtOIG/zNr1J4 R3I906yh6048fAYjJ46K8FtmZ1ZsMcI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tIN4j02Xkct2mDNk+YL9s0Zo2E8nu5GMBa5iZ48ivg5Fcvd8rpYyKU5t7bQCPZ9qkbiDyDqg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:59d:b0:f3:627:e2b0 with SMTP id m29-20020a056870059d00b000f30627e2b0mr14665776oap.47.1656870424247; Sun, 03 Jul 2022 10:47:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (user.186-235-147-70.acesso10.net.br. [186.235.147.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t6-20020a056870f20600b000f33ff285d8sm10381046oao.31.2022.07.03.10.47.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Jul 2022 10:47:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2022 14:46:56 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Andres Freund CC: sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Mark Rutland , alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, Namhyung Kim , Quentin Monnet , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: =?US-ASCII?Q?Re=3A_=5Bperf-tools=5D_Build-error_in_too?= =?US-ASCII?Q?ls/perf/util/annotate=2Ec_with_LLVM-14?= User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <20220703165448.7d2akxawzdvqigat@awork3.anarazel.de> References: <1496A989-23D2-474D-B941-BA2D74761A7E@gmail.com> <20220703165448.7d2akxawzdvqigat@awork3.anarazel.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org On July 3, 2022 1:54:48 PM GMT-03:00, Andres Freund = wrote: >Hi, > >On 2022-07-03 10:54:45 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >> That series should be split a bit further, so that the >> new features test is in a separate patch, i=2Ee=2E I don't process bpft= ool patches, but can process the feature test and the tools/perf part=2E > >Ok, will split it further=2E Should I do > >1) feature test >2) introduce compat header header >3) use feature test, use header in perf/ >4) use feature test, use header in bpf/ > >Or should 3, 4 be split to separately introduce the feature test and use = of >the compat header? I think 4 patches are ok,=20 - Arnaldo > >Greetings, > >Andres Freund