From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] perf test: Do not set TEST_SKIP for record subtests
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 08:34:23 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1Z4P5e/CT0O23jr@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fVRCaTJseQA_AGZ8nc0H65iNsPUfjDNtopd++JK53kYWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Em Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 05:05:49PM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:26 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > It now has 4 sub tests and one of them should run at least.
> > But once TEST_SKIP (= 2) return value is set, it won't be overwritten
> > unless there's a failure. I think we should return success when one
> > or more tested are skipped but the remaining subtests are passed.
> >
> > So update the test code not to set the err variable when it skips
> > the test.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>
> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
>
> Perhaps we can have proper sub-tests in shell tests like we do for the C ones.
Yeah, giving info about the various subtests helps in giving progress
information and overal confidence that more stuff is being tested.
- Arnaldo
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh | 12 ------------
> > 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
> > index 01aa9531b369..e93b3a8871fe 100755
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
> > @@ -81,10 +81,6 @@ test_per_thread() {
> > if ! perf record -o /dev/null --quiet ${testprog} 2> /dev/null
> > then
> > echo "Per-thread record [Skipped event not supported]"
> > - if [ $err -ne 1 ]
> > - then
> > - err=2
> > - fi
> > return
> > fi
> > if ! perf record --per-thread -o "${perfdata}" ${testprog} 2> /dev/null
> > @@ -131,10 +127,6 @@ test_register_capture() {
> > if ! perf list | grep -q 'br_inst_retired.near_call'
> > then
> > echo "Register capture test [Skipped missing event]"
> > - if [ $err -ne 1 ]
> > - then
> > - err=2
> > - fi
> > return
> > fi
> > if ! perf record --intr-regs=\? 2>&1 | grep -q 'available registers: AX BX CX DX SI DI BP SP IP FLAGS CS SS R8 R9 R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15'
> > @@ -159,10 +151,6 @@ test_system_wide() {
> > if ! perf record -aB --synth=no -o "${perfdata}" ${testprog} 2> /dev/null
> > then
> > echo "System-wide record [Skipped not supported]"
> > - if [ $err -ne 1 ]
> > - then
> > - err=2
> > - fi
> > return
> > fi
> > if ! perf report -i "${perfdata}" -q | grep -q "${testsym}"
> > --
> > 2.38.0.135.g90850a2211-goog
> >
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-24 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-20 17:26 [PATCHSET 0/8] perf test: Improve perf record tests (v2) Namhyung Kim
2022-10-20 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf test: Do not use instructions:u explicitly Namhyung Kim
2022-10-20 23:47 ` Ian Rogers
2022-10-20 17:26 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf test: Fix shellcheck issues in the record test Namhyung Kim
2022-10-20 23:48 ` Ian Rogers
2022-10-21 8:45 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-10-20 17:26 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf test: Use a test program in perf record tests Namhyung Kim
2022-10-20 23:52 ` Ian Rogers
2022-10-24 11:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-10-24 14:00 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-10-24 16:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-10-25 4:12 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-10-25 13:10 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-10-25 13:17 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-10-25 4:18 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-10-21 8:45 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-10-20 17:26 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf test: Wait for a new thread when testing --per-thread record Namhyung Kim
2022-10-20 23:57 ` Ian Rogers
2022-10-21 8:45 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-10-20 17:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf test: Add system-wide mode in perf record tests Namhyung Kim
2022-10-21 0:00 ` Ian Rogers
2022-10-26 14:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-10-20 17:26 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf test: Add target workload test " Namhyung Kim
2022-10-21 0:01 ` Ian Rogers
2022-10-21 8:45 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-10-20 17:26 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf test: Test record with --threads option Namhyung Kim
2022-10-21 0:02 ` Ian Rogers
2022-10-21 8:45 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-10-20 17:26 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf test: Do not set TEST_SKIP for record subtests Namhyung Kim
2022-10-21 0:05 ` Ian Rogers
2022-10-24 11:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2022-10-26 14:15 ` [PATCHSET 0/8] perf test: Improve perf record tests (v2) Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1Z4P5e/CT0O23jr@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).