From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] perf trace: 5sec fix libbpf 1.0+ compatibility
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 12:36:36 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2PgBPeZsd9+YWB4@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221103045437.163510-7-irogers@google.com>
Em Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 09:54:36PM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> Avoid use of tools/perf/include/bpf/bpf.h and use the more regular BPF
> headers.
>
> Note, on testing the probe was unable to attach and the program failed.
Humm, trying to test:
[root@quaco ~]# perf trace -e /home/acme/git/perf/tools/perf/examples/bpf/5sec.c |& head -15
In file included from /home/acme/git/perf/tools/perf/examples/bpf/5sec.c:42:
In file included from /lib/modules/5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64/build/./include/linux/bpf.h:9:
In file included from /lib/modules/5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64/build/./include/linux/workqueue.h:9:
In file included from /lib/modules/5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64/build/./include/linux/timer.h:6:
In file included from /lib/modules/5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64/build/./include/linux/ktime.h:24:
In file included from /lib/modules/5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64/build/./include/linux/time.h:6:
In file included from /lib/modules/5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64/build/./include/linux/math64.h:6:
In file included from /lib/modules/5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64/build/./include/linux/math.h:6:
/lib/modules/5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64/build/./arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h:85:28: error: invalid output constraint '=a' in asm
asm ("mulq %2; divq %3" : "=a" (q)
^
In file included from /home/acme/git/perf/tools/perf/examples/bpf/5sec.c:42:
In file included from /lib/modules/5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64/build/./include/linux/bpf.h:9:
In file included from /lib/modules/5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64/build/./include/linux/workqueue.h:9:
In file included from /lib/modules/5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64/build/./include/linux/timer.h:6:
[root@quaco ~]#
So I go and try to remove that <linux/bpf.h>:
[acme@quaco perf]$ git diff
diff --git a/tools/perf/examples/bpf/5sec.c b/tools/perf/examples/bpf/5sec.c
index 3bd7fc17631f0440..e0d5525c6a1374ae 100644
--- a/tools/perf/examples/bpf/5sec.c
+++ b/tools/perf/examples/bpf/5sec.c
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@
Copyright (C) 2018 Red Hat, Inc., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
*/
-#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
#define NSEC_PER_SEC 1000000000L
[acme@quaco perf]$
[root@quaco ~]# perf trace -e /home/acme/git/perf/tools/perf/examples/bpf/5sec.c
/home/acme/git/perf/tools/perf/examples/bpf/5sec.c:42:10: fatal error: 'bpf/bpf_helpers.h' file not found
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 error generated.
ERROR: unable to compile /home/acme/git/perf/tools/perf/examples/bpf/5sec.c
Hint: Check error message shown above.
Hint: You can also pre-compile it into .o using:
clang -target bpf -O2 -c /home/acme/git/perf/tools/perf/examples/bpf/5sec.c
with proper -I and -D options.
event syntax error: '/home/acme/git/perf/tools/perf/examples/bpf/5sec.c'
\___ Failed to load /home/acme/git/perf/tools/perf/examples/bpf/5sec.c from source: Error when compiling BPF scriptlet
(add -v to see detail)
Run 'perf list' for a list of valid events
Usage: perf trace [<options>] [<command>]
or: perf trace [<options>] -- <command> [<options>]
or: perf trace record [<options>] [<command>]
or: perf trace record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>]
-e, --event <event> event/syscall selector. use 'perf list' to list available events
[root@quaco ~]#
It is not even finding it, in this machine I have libbpf 0.7.0, so there
is a /usr/include/bpf/bpf_helpers.h, but probably that isn't in the
include path set up to build the tools/perf/examples/bpf/ files, perhaps
it should use:
-Itools/lib/ so that it gets tools/lib/bpf_helpers.h?
Trying to get this tested...
- Arnaldo
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/examples/bpf/5sec.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/examples/bpf/5sec.c b/tools/perf/examples/bpf/5sec.c
> index e6b6181c6dc6..f22312c64713 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/examples/bpf/5sec.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/examples/bpf/5sec.c
> @@ -39,13 +39,15 @@
> Copyright (C) 2018 Red Hat, Inc., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> */
>
> -#include <bpf.h>
> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
>
> #define NSEC_PER_SEC 1000000000L
>
> -int probe(hrtimer_nanosleep, rqtp)(void *ctx, int err, long long sec)
> +SEC("hrtimer_nanosleep=hrtimer_nanosleep rqtp")
> +int hrtimer_nanosleep(void *ctx, int err, long long sec)
> {
> return sec / NSEC_PER_SEC == 5ULL;
> }
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
>
> -license(GPL);
> --
> 2.38.1.273.g43a17bfeac-goog
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-03 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-03 4:54 [PATCH v1 0/7] Fix perf trace libbpf 1.0+ compatibility Ian Rogers
2022-11-03 4:54 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] perf trace: Raw augmented syscalls fix " Ian Rogers
2022-11-03 4:54 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] perf trace: Etcsnoop " Ian Rogers
2022-11-03 4:54 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] perf trace: Augmented syscalls " Ian Rogers
2022-11-03 4:54 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] perf trace: hello " Ian Rogers
2022-11-03 4:54 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] perf trace: empty " Ian Rogers
2022-11-03 4:54 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] perf trace: 5sec " Ian Rogers
2022-11-03 15:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2022-11-03 15:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-11-03 15:52 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-11-03 16:04 ` Ian Rogers
2022-11-03 19:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-11-03 21:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-11-03 22:01 ` Ian Rogers
2022-11-04 0:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-11-04 1:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-11-03 4:54 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] perf bpf: Remove now unused BPF headers Ian Rogers
2022-11-11 12:09 ` [PATCH v1 0/7] Fix perf trace libbpf 1.0+ compatibility Leo Yan
2022-11-15 19:12 ` Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2PgBPeZsd9+YWB4@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).