linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf build: Use libtraceevent from the system
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 11:13:41 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5c3FSm16tIKQfgS@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fXJpxq-A7VJkZv+Y0fiCuNj9bhTXJx9+FGBQtePJ92z_A@mail.gmail.com>

Em Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 03:05:29PM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 3:00 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 2:32 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > commit a0ec3ef4590e7e82339b6f318e671a6b69fd94e8
> > > Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> > > Date:   Thu Dec 8 19:28:58 2022 -0300

> > >     perf tools: Add test to check if libtracevent has TEP_FIELD_IS_RELATIVE

> > Could HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT_TEP_FIELD_IS_RELATIVE be a version rather
> > than feature check, something like:

> > #define MAKE_LIBTRACEEVENT_VERSION(maj, mid, min) (maj * 255 *255 +
> > mid * 255 + min)
> > #define HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT_TEP_FIELD_IS_RELATIVE
> > (LIBTRACEEVENT_VERSION >= MAKE_LIBTRACEEVENT_VERSION(1, 5, 0)

> > Note, we have LIBTRACEEVENT_VERSION computed in Makefile.config by way
> > of pkg-config.
 
> LIBTRACEEVENT_VERSION had a workaround if pkg-config wasn't present to
> default to 1.1.0 for its use in:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20210923001024.550263-4-irogers@google.com/
> We should un-revert that change now the -Itools/lib issue is resolved
> (1.1 traceevent headers compiled against newer system libtraceevent
> library).

Can you please send that un-revert as a proper patch?

Meanwhile, I came up with this quick hack on top of what I had, seems to
be enough, will test it with systems with libtraceevent <= 1.5.0, where
TEP_FIELD_IS_RELATIVE was introduced.

Will do it after removing the tools/build/feature/ TEP_FIELD_IS_RELATIVE
big hammer check.

- Arnaldo

diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile.config b/tools/perf/Makefile.config
index e29975664f06bd61..52a4dc029111c1e2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Makefile.config
+++ b/tools/perf/Makefile.config
@@ -1197,8 +1197,8 @@ ifneq ($(NO_LIBTRACEEVENT),1)
     LIBTRACEEVENT_VERSION_CPP := $(shell expr $(LIBTRACEEVENT_VERSION_1) \* 255 \* 255 + $(LIBTRACEEVENT_VERSION_2) \* 255 + $(LIBTRACEEVENT_VERSION_3))
     CFLAGS += -DLIBTRACEEVENT_VERSION=$(LIBTRACEEVENT_VERSION_CPP)
     $(call detected,CONFIG_LIBTRACEEVENT)
-    $(call feature_check,libtraceevent-tep_field_is_relative)
-    ifeq ($(feature-libtraceevent-tep_field_is_relative), 1)
+    LIBTRACEEVENT_VERSION_WITH_TEP_FIELD_IS_RELATIVE := $(shell expr 1 \* 255 \* 255 + 5 \* 255 + 0) # 1.5.0
+    ifeq ($(shell test $(LIBTRACEEVENT_VERSION_CPP) -gt $(LIBTRACEEVENT_VERSION_WITH_TEP_FIELD_IS_RELATIVE); echo $$?),0)
       CFLAGS += -DHAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT_TEP_FIELD_IS_RELATIVE
     endif
   else

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-12 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-05 22:59 [PATCH 0/3] libtraceevent from system and build fix Ian Rogers
2022-12-05 22:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf build: Fixes for LIBTRACEEVENT_DYNAMIC Ian Rogers
2022-12-05 22:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf build: Use libtraceevent from the system Ian Rogers
2022-12-06 16:15   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-06 16:20     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-06 16:23       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-06 16:30         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-06 16:37           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-06 16:41             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-06 17:01               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-06 17:07                 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-06 17:13                   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-06 17:31                     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-06 22:22                       ` Ian Rogers
2022-12-07 14:21                         ` [ALMOST ready] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-07 14:31                           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-07 14:33                             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-07 14:39                             ` Steven Rostedt
2022-12-07 16:02                               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-07 16:56                                 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-07 17:00                                 ` Ian Rogers
2022-12-07 14:37                           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-07 13:38                       ` Athira Rajeev
2022-12-07 17:27                         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-07 17:31                           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-07 17:43                             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-08  6:51                           ` Athira Rajeev
2022-12-08 22:04                             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-08 22:32                               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-08 23:00                                 ` Ian Rogers
2022-12-08 23:05                                   ` Ian Rogers
2022-12-12 14:13                                     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2022-12-12 14:28                                     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-09  6:34                                 ` Athira Rajeev
2022-12-12 13:51                                   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-13  9:53                                     ` Athira Rajeev
2022-12-13 22:09                                       ` Ian Rogers
2022-12-13 22:33                                         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-13 22:47                                           ` Ian Rogers
2022-12-15  7:10                                         ` Athira Rajeev
2022-12-07 13:33   ` Athira Rajeev
2022-12-07 13:46   ` Athira Rajeev
2022-12-07 16:16     ` Ian Rogers
2022-12-07 16:52     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-12-05 22:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf build: Fix python/perf.so library's name Ian Rogers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y5c3FSm16tIKQfgS@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).