From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
svens@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, sumanthk@linux.ibm.com,
hca@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf lock: Fix core dump in command perf lock contention
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 12:33:35 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7L5T2IHdovfLgWp@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221230102627.2410847-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Em Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 11:26:27AM +0100, Thomas Richter escreveu:
> The test case perf lock contention dumps core on s390. Run the following
> commands:
> # ./perf lock record -- ./perf bench sched messaging
> # Running 'sched/messaging' benchmark:
> # 20 sender and receiver processes per group
> # 10 groups == 400 processes run
>
> Total time: 2.799 [sec]
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.073 MB perf.data (100 samples) ]
> #
> # ./perf lock contention
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> #
>
> The function call stack is lengthy, here are the top 5 functions:
> # gdb ./perf core.24048
> GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora Linux 12.1-6.fc37
> Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> Core was generated by `./perf lock contention'.
> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> #0 0x00000000011dd25c in machine__is_lock_function (machine=0x3029e28,
> addr=1789230) at util/machine.c:3356
> 3356 machine->sched.text_end = kmap->unmap_ip(kmap, sym->start);
>
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x00000000011dd25c in machine__is_lock_function (machine=0x3029e28,\
> addr=1789230) at util/machine.c:3356
> #1 0x000000000109f244 in callchain_id (evsel=0x30313e0,\
> sample=0x3ffea4f77d0) at builtin-lock.c:957
> #2 0x000000000109e094 in get_key_by_aggr_mode (key=0x3ffea4f7290,\
> addr=27758136, evsel=0x30313e0, sample=0x3ffea4f77d0) \
> at builtin-lock.c:586
> #3 0x000000000109f4d0 in report_lock_contention_begin_event \
> (evsel=0x30313e0, sample=0x3ffea4f77d0)
> at builtin-lock.c:1004
> #4 0x00000000010a00ae in evsel__process_contention_begin \
> (evsel=0x30313e0, sample=0x3ffea4f77d0)
> at builtin-lock.c:1254
> #5 0x00000000010a0e14 in process_sample_event (tool=0x3ffea4f8480, \
> event=0x3ff85601ef8, sample=0x3ffea4f77d0,
> evsel=0x30313e0, machine=0x3029e28) at builtin-lock.c:1464
> sample=0x3ffea4f77d0, evsel=0x30313e0, machine=0x3029e28) \
> at util/session.c:1523
> .....
>
> The issue is in function machine__is_lock_function() in file
> ./util/machine.c lines 3355:
> /* should not fail from here */
> sym = machine__find_kernel_symbol_by_name(machine, "__sched_text_end",
> &kmap);
> machine->sched.text_end = kmap->unmap_ip(kmap, sym->start)
>
> On s390 the symbol __sched_text_end is *NOT* in the symbol list and the
> resulting pointer sym is set to NULL. The sym->start is then a NULL pointer
> access and generates the core dump.
>
> The reason why __sched_text_end is not in the symbol list on s390 is
> simple:
> When the symbol list is created at perf start up with function calls
> dso__load
> +--> dso__load_vmlinux_path
> +--> dso__load_vmlinux
> +--> dso__load_sym
> +--> dso__load_sym_internal (reads kernel symbols)
> +--> symbols__fixup_end
> +--> symbols__fixup_duplicate
>
> The issue is in function symbols__fixup_duplicate(). It deletes all
> symbols with have the same address. On s390
> # nm -g ~/linux/vmlinux| fgrep c68390
> 0000000000c68390 T __cpuidle_text_start
> 0000000000c68390 T __sched_text_end
> #
> two symbols have identical addresses and __sched_text_end is considered
> duplicate (in ascending sort order) and removed from the symbol list.
> Therefore it is missing and an invalid pointer reference occurs.
> The code checks for symbol __sched_text_start and when it exists assumes
> symbol __sched_text_end is also in the symbol table. However this is
> not the case on s390.
>
> Same situation exists for symbol __lock_text_start:
> 0000000000c68770 T __cpuidle_text_end
> 0000000000c68770 T __lock_text_start
> This symbol is also removed from the symbol table but used in function
> machine__is_lock_function().
>
> To fix this and keep duplicate symbols in the symbol table, set
> symbol_conf.allow_aliases to true. This prevents the removal of duplicate
> symbols in function symbols__fixup_duplicate().
>
> Output After:
> # ./perf lock contention
> contended total wait max wait avg wait type caller
>
> 48 124.39 ms 123.99 ms 2.59 ms rwsem:W unlink_anon_vmas+0x24a
> 47 83.68 ms 83.26 ms 1.78 ms rwsem:W free_pgtables+0x132
> 5 41.22 us 10.55 us 8.24 us rwsem:W free_pgtables+0x140
> 4 40.12 us 20.55 us 10.03 us rwsem:W copy_process+0x1ac8
> #
>
> Fixes: cc2367eebb0c ("machine: Adopt is_lock_function() from builtin-lock.c")
Humm, is that really the cset that introduces the problem? It just moves
things around, the cset that introduced the is_lock_function() function,
that assumed that __sched_text_end was always available was:
commit 0d2997f750d1de394231bc22768dab94a5b5db2f
Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: Wed Jun 15 09:32:22 2022 -0700
perf lock: Look up callchain for the contended locks
---
Right? Namhyung? Can you spot any problem in enabling duplicates as a
fix?
- Arnaldo
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-lock.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c b/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
> index 718b82bfcdff..506c2fe42d52 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
> @@ -1670,6 +1670,7 @@ static int __cmd_report(bool display_info)
>
> /* for lock function check */
> symbol_conf.sort_by_name = true;
> + symbol_conf.allow_aliases = true;
> symbol__init(&session->header.env);
>
> if (!data.is_pipe) {
> @@ -1757,6 +1758,7 @@ static int __cmd_contention(int argc, const char **argv)
>
> /* for lock function check */
> symbol_conf.sort_by_name = true;
> + symbol_conf.allow_aliases = true;
> symbol__init(&session->header.env);
>
> if (use_bpf) {
> --
> 2.38.1
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-02 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-30 10:26 [PATCH] perf lock: Fix core dump in command perf lock contention Thomas Richter
2023-01-02 15:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2023-01-03 16:45 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-01-03 18:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y7L5T2IHdovfLgWp@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).