linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
	Florian Fischer <florian.fischer@muhq.space>,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Kang Minchul <tegongkang@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
	Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Perry Taylor <perry.taylor@intel.com>,
	Caleb Biggers <caleb.biggers@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf pmu: Fix aarch64 build
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 11:35:28 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y90bsM4DGL+WV8m0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y90XgtX9uv26UAQa@kernel.org>

Em Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:17:38AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 05:41:22PM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 5:40 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > ARM64 overrides a weak function but a previous change had broken the
> > > build.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 8cefeb8bd336 ("perf pmu-events: Introduce pmu_metrics_table")
> > 
> > As 8cefeb8bd336 ("perf pmu-events: Introduce pmu_metrics_table") is
> > only on tmp.perf/core then it may be best to just squash this fix into
> > that.
> 
> Yeah, that was my intention, I'll fold it there to keep bisection,
> thanks for fixing it so fast, I'll double check on my rk3399 board and
> on again on the cross-build container.

Nope, that is not what I reported yesterday, trying to build it on the
rk3399 board:

acme@roc-rk3399-pc:~/git/perf$ cat /etc/os-release
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS"
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION_ID="22.04"
VERSION="22.04.1 LTS (Jammy Jellyfish)"
VERSION_CODENAME=jammy
ID=ubuntu
ID_LIKE=debian
HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/"
SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/"
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/"
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy"
UBUNTU_CODENAME=jammy
acme@roc-rk3399-pc:~/git/perf$

 CC      /tmp/build/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.o
  CC      /tmp/build/perf/bench/epoll-wait.o
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c: In function ‘pmu__find_core_pmu’:
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:27:33: error: declaration of ‘pmu_metrics_table__find’ shadows a global declaration [-Werror=shadow]
   27 | const struct pmu_metrics_table *pmu_metrics_table__find(void)
      |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:5:
arch/arm64/util/../../../util/pmu.h:234:33: note: shadowed declaration is here
  234 | const struct pmu_metrics_table *pmu_metrics_table__find(void);
      |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c: In function ‘pmu_metrics_table__find’:
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:29:26: error: declaration of ‘pmu’ shadows a previous local [-Werror=shadow]
   29 |         struct perf_pmu *pmu = pmu__find_core_pmu();
      |                          ^~~
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:11:26: note: shadowed declaration is here
   11 |         struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
      |                          ^~~
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c: In function ‘pmu__find_core_pmu’:
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:27:1: error: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Werror=declaration-after-statement]
   27 | const struct pmu_metrics_table *pmu_metrics_table__find(void)
      | ^~~~~
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:37:32: error: declaration of ‘pmu_events_table__find’ shadows a global declaration [-Werror=shadow]
   37 | const struct pmu_events_table *pmu_events_table__find(void)
      |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:5:
arch/arm64/util/../../../util/pmu.h:233:32: note: shadowed declaration is here
  233 | const struct pmu_events_table *pmu_events_table__find(void);
      |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c: In function ‘pmu_events_table__find’:
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:39:26: error: declaration of ‘pmu’ shadows a previous local [-Werror=shadow]
   39 |         struct perf_pmu *pmu = pmu__find_core_pmu();
      |                          ^~~
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:11:26: note: shadowed declaration is here
   11 |         struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
      |                          ^~~
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c: In function ‘pmu__find_core_pmu’:
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:47:8: error: declaration of ‘perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle’ shadows a global declaration [-Werror=shadow]
   47 | double perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle(void)
      |        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:5:
arch/arm64/util/../../../util/pmu.h:255:8: note: shadowed declaration is here
  255 | double perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle(void);
      |        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c: In function ‘perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle’:
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:51:26: error: declaration of ‘pmu’ shadows a previous local [-Werror=shadow]
   51 |         struct perf_pmu *pmu = pmu__find_core_pmu();
      |                          ^~~
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:11:26: note: shadowed declaration is here
   11 |         struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
      |                          ^~~
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c: In function ‘pmu__find_core_pmu’:
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:64:1: error: expected declaration or statement at end of input
   64 | }
      | ^
At top level:
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:47:8: error: ‘perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
   47 | double perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle(void)
      |        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:37:32: error: ‘pmu_events_table__find’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
   37 | const struct pmu_events_table *pmu_events_table__find(void)
      |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/arm64/util/pmu.c:27:33: error: ‘pmu_metrics_table__find’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
   27 | const struct pmu_metrics_table *pmu_metrics_table__find(void)
      |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[6]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:98: /tmp/build/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.o] Error 1
make[5]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:140: util] Error 2
make[4]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:140: arm64] Error 2
make[3]: *** [/home/acme/git/perf/tools/build/Makefile.build:140: arch] Error 2
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....


  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-03 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-03  1:40 [PATCH v1] perf pmu: Fix aarch64 build Ian Rogers
2023-02-03  1:41 ` Ian Rogers
2023-02-03 14:17   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 14:35     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2023-02-03 14:36       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 14:43         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 15:43           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 16:02             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-03 16:56               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-02-04 21:23                 ` Ian Rogers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y90bsM4DGL+WV8m0@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=caleb.biggers@intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=florian.fischer@muhq.space \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
    --cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=perry.taylor@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=tegongkang@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).