From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4AAC4338F for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D04B61BA5 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229489AbhG0QZe (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2021 12:25:34 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33166 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229441AbhG0QZd (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2021 12:25:33 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A9BB61BA1; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:25:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1627403133; bh=9B+zhmaJ1zRMWRRJsUG+h4L/F30ioCrCNbMWKo+jSzw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DboOvg59yO5ATxI2gjD0RrwNyc+IARlAylqpnFoWk5moIIWwjeZcrpAwGcl+j60S8 /OiOn5Ut07MoNBIhxWL+V1AbE++Oelg3u6VqRtaigvliZKvb1PDnUG9QDgBfnUZHg3 zXcdXM2sSwEjhS85ZQgYGlMDxRkewPUcx8lhEdzI1taqb+uE9sFvXEQceHOBmcDu0H lOXhXDnJhCfV0bnIu5JiVITaiVoJmQQsmBLrI9ihxHPI0Xh5MIChJOursWlrH6SKHV vYcTSwBKZAsBetnt4pXlLAHjnqIgbtJNu/KqShBvN894t+wUQXTw/phRRgErNrreKI jvVWlGqZJIvjQ== Received: by quaco.ghostprotocols.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 867B1403F2; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 13:25:29 -0300 (-03) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 13:25:29 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: John Garry Cc: "Jin, Yao" , peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, kjain@linux.ibm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, irogers@google.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf pmu: Fix alias matching Message-ID: References: <1626793819-79090-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <0b57fa9b-fba4-8143-bef6-b7c4f2987635@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:32:55AM +0100, John Garry escreveu: > On 21/07/2021 04:07, Jin, Yao wrote: > > > > > Hi Arnaldo, > > Can you kindly consider picking up this patch? > > Thanks > > > > Fixes: c47a5599eda3 ("perf tools: Fix pattern matching for same > > > substring in different PMU type") > > > Signed-off-by: John Garry > > > --- > > > @Jin Yao, please test for your scenarios > > > > > > > For x86, the form uncore_pmu_{digits} or the uncore_pmu itself are > > supported. We don't have more complex case such as the name in the form > > aaa_bbbX_cccY. So my test didn't cover that complex form. > > > > For my test, your patch works, thanks! :) > > Can we take this as a tested-by? Processed and added his Tested-by. - Arnaldo