From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D01C4338F for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 18:03:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B160C610E6 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 18:03:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238921AbhHXSD7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2021 14:03:59 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33794 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238629AbhHXSDx (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2021 14:03:53 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F0D0610D0; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 18:03:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1629828189; bh=6+xeVzOAhY7yu4NJoUhz/MQdr0MvjHaPrV6CCAoQ9HI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=uQ0cj3GrhI2zHosqh8PGmQwEj420cq4WijwVnmbEVvwr0xW4YodC4ykABR9dUKH11 FVPdSO91BYizeS1lf3m/4PEAAlCMepN7CLvjLEXD+emFjTpObV2+L5Fry0WETbEDoA /kjDlWxIllfxCL6JdR+9sUzLZKLOWfI+NEGiPkwMRHsvZPOWTlQZiNhRTZQmE942UD JaqOHN+/Tt/y1R5xdYAZ+HnW2xvrYm+c4PUFiXozy9rR9EHLuehKcKkfT7drBkjo76 cAc1cUyOuk9bo7apLAxSxSIIbhj803zU4t7u0ks9ylHgrf5lKkm2/cqXUyvnQNnr6d b/Ox10nhcLABw== Received: by quaco.ghostprotocols.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 303FD4007E; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:03:07 -0300 (-03) Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:03:07 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Lukas Bulwahn Cc: Nghia Le , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com, Namhyung Kim , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Add missing newline at the end of file Message-ID: References: <20210824085947.224062-1-nghialm78@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:37:19PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn escreveu: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 11:00 AM Nghia Le wrote: > > > > Add missing newline at the end of file parse-sublevel-options.h. > > Thus removing relevant warning reported by checkpatch. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nghia Le > > Reviewed-by: Lukas Bulwahn Thanks, applied. - Arnaldo > This addresses the only instance of a "no newline at the end of the > file" throughout the kernel tree. > > This is part of a larger effort to identify all rules that checkpatch > warns about and that are never false positives (compared to the many > rules in checkpatch that are heuristics or are known to be ignored by > the current development community and hence, cause many false > positives). We could use such rules to be enforced in the submission > process. > > Lukas > Lukas > > --- > > tools/perf/util/parse-sublevel-options.h | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-sublevel-options.h b/tools/perf/util/parse-sublevel-options.h > > index 9b9efcc2aaad..578b18ef03bb 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-sublevel-options.h > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-sublevel-options.h > > @@ -8,4 +8,4 @@ struct sublevel_option { > > > > int perf_parse_sublevel_options(const char *str, struct sublevel_option *opts); > > > > -#endif > > \ No newline at end of file > > +#endif > > -- > > 2.25.1 > > -- - Arnaldo