linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	jolsa@redhat.com, yao.jin@linux.intel.com, namhyung@kernel.org,
	kim.phillips@amd.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf annotate: Add fusion logic for AMD microarchs
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 11:19:02 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YTtpVpo3d/h5YkVc@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a987cad-6c46-280e-f791-6c59b6628a45@amd.com>

Em Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 04:47:31PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
> 
> >> +static bool x86__ins_is_fused(struct arch *arch, const char *ins1,
> >> +			      const char *ins2)
> >> +{
> >> +	if (strstarts(arch->vendor, "AuthenticAMD"))
> >> +		return amd__ins_is_fused(arch, ins1, ins2);
> >> +
> >> +	return intel__ins_is_fused(arch, ins1, ins2);
> >> +}
> >> +
> > 
> > Can we instead make x86__ins_is_fused be a pointer and instead of
> > storing arch->vendor we set it to one of amd__ins_is_fused() or
> > intel__ins_is_fused()?
> > 
> > I.e. here:
> > 
> >>  static int x86__cpuid_parse(struct arch *arch, char *cpuid)
> >>  {
> >>  	unsigned int family, model, stepping;
> >> @@ -184,6 +216,9 @@ static int x86__cpuid_parse(struct arch *arch, char *cpuid)
> >>  	if (ret == 3) {
> >>  		arch->family = family;
> >>  		arch->model = model;
> >> +		arch->vendor = strndup(cpuid, 12);
> > 
> > 		x86__ins_is_fused = strstarts(cpuid, "AuthenticAMD") ?
> > 					amd__ins_is_fused :
> > 					intel__ins_is_fused;
> 
> Sure. Will post v2.

Thanks, if you're quick we may get this into this merge window :-)

> Thanks for the review Arnaldo,

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-10 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-06 10:56 [PATCH 1/2] perf annotate: Fix fused instr logic for assembly functions Ravi Bangoria
2021-09-06 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf annotate: Add fusion logic for AMD microarchs Ravi Bangoria
2021-09-09 20:32   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-09-10 11:17     ` Ravi Bangoria
2021-09-10 14:19       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2021-09-11  4:42         ` Ravi Bangoria

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YTtpVpo3d/h5YkVc@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).