From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
"Paul A . Clarke" <pc@us.ibm.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
eranian@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/22] perf test: Convert watch point tests to test cases.
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:45:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXAPZIKwHbnLOL4b@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211013174604.747276-12-irogers@google.com>
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 10:45:53AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Use null terminated array of test cases rather than the previous sub
> test functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/wp.c | 128 ++++++++++--------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/wp.c b/tools/perf/tests/wp.c
> index 904bdf2dcf81..2c0513257b15 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/wp.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/wp.c
> @@ -62,8 +62,12 @@ static int __event(int wp_type, void *wp_addr, unsigned long wp_len)
> return fd;
> }
>
> -static int wp_ro_test(void)
> +static int test__wp_ro(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
> + int subtest __maybe_unused)
> {
> +#if defined(__s390x__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__)
> + return TEST_SKIP;
> +#else
> int fd;
> unsigned long tmp, tmp1 = rand();
>
> @@ -79,10 +83,15 @@ static int wp_ro_test(void)
>
> close(fd);
> return 0;
> +#endif
> }
>
> -static int wp_wo_test(void)
> +static int test__wp_wo(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
> + int subtest __maybe_unused)
> {
> +#if defined(__s390x__)
> + return TEST_SKIP;
> +#else
> int fd;
> unsigned long tmp, tmp1 = rand();
>
> @@ -98,10 +107,15 @@ static int wp_wo_test(void)
>
> close(fd);
> return 0;
> +#endif
> }
>
> -static int wp_rw_test(void)
> +static int test__wp_rw(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
> + int subtest __maybe_unused)
> {
> +#if defined(__s390x__)
> + return TEST_SKIP;
> +#else
> int fd;
> unsigned long tmp, tmp1 = rand();
>
> @@ -118,10 +132,15 @@ static int wp_rw_test(void)
>
> close(fd);
> return 0;
> +#endif
> }
>
> -static int wp_modify_test(void)
> +static int test__wp_modify(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
> + int subtest __maybe_unused)
> {
> +#if defined(__s390x__)
> + return TEST_SKIP;
> +#else
> int fd, ret;
> unsigned long tmp = rand();
> struct perf_event_attr new_attr;
> @@ -163,105 +182,18 @@ static int wp_modify_test(void)
>
> close(fd);
> return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static bool wp_ro_supported(void)
> -{
> -#if defined (__x86_64__) || defined (__i386__)
> - return false;
> -#else
> - return true;
> -#endif
> -}
> -
> -static const char *wp_ro_skip_msg(void)
> -{
> -#if defined (__x86_64__) || defined (__i386__)
> - return "missing hardware support";
> -#else
> - return NULL;
> #endif
> }
>
> -static struct {
> - const char *desc;
> - int (*target_func)(void);
> - bool (*is_supported)(void);
> - const char *(*skip_msg)(void);
> -} wp_testcase_table[] = {
> - {
> - .desc = "Read Only Watchpoint",
> - .target_func = &wp_ro_test,
> - .is_supported = &wp_ro_supported,
> - .skip_msg = &wp_ro_skip_msg,
> - },
> - {
> - .desc = "Write Only Watchpoint",
> - .target_func = &wp_wo_test,
> - },
> - {
> - .desc = "Read / Write Watchpoint",
> - .target_func = &wp_rw_test,
> - },
> - {
> - .desc = "Modify Watchpoint",
> - .target_func = &wp_modify_test,
> - },
> +static struct test_case wp_tests[] = {
> + TEST_CASE_REASON("Read Only Watchpoint", wp_ro, "missing hardware support"),
> + TEST_CASE_REASON("Write Only Watchpoint", wp_wo, "missing hardware support"),
> + TEST_CASE_REASON("Read / Write Watchpoint", wp_rw, "missing hardware support"),
> + TEST_CASE_REASON("Modify Watchpoint", wp_modify, "missing hardware support"),
> + { .name = NULL, }
> };
>
> -static int test__wp_subtest_get_nr(void)
> -{
> - return (int)ARRAY_SIZE(wp_testcase_table);
> -}
> -
> -static const char *test__wp_subtest_get_desc(int i)
> -{
> - if (i < 0 || i >= (int)ARRAY_SIZE(wp_testcase_table))
> - return NULL;
> - return wp_testcase_table[i].desc;
> -}
> -
> -static const char *test__wp_subtest_skip_reason(int i)
> -{
> - if (i < 0 || i >= (int)ARRAY_SIZE(wp_testcase_table))
> - return NULL;
> - if (!wp_testcase_table[i].skip_msg)
> - return NULL;
> - return wp_testcase_table[i].skip_msg();
> -}
> -
> -static int test__wp(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int i)
> -{
> - if (i < 0 || i >= (int)ARRAY_SIZE(wp_testcase_table))
> - return TEST_FAIL;
> -
> - if (wp_testcase_table[i].is_supported &&
> - !wp_testcase_table[i].is_supported())
> - return TEST_SKIP;
> -
> - return !wp_testcase_table[i].target_func() ? TEST_OK : TEST_FAIL;
> -}
> -
> -/* The s390 so far does not have support for
> - * instruction breakpoint using the perf_event_open() system call.
> - */
> -static bool test__wp_is_supported(void)
> -{
> -#if defined(__s390x__)
> - return false;
> -#else
> - return true;
> -#endif
> -}
> -
> struct test_suite suite__wp = {
> .desc = "Watchpoint",
> - .func = test__wp,
> - .is_supported = test__wp_is_supported,
hm, why do we get rid of this callback and instead use #ifdef 3 times above?
jirka
> - .subtest = {
> - .skip_if_fail = false,
> - .get_nr = test__wp_subtest_get_nr,
> - .get_desc = test__wp_subtest_get_desc,
> - .skip_reason = test__wp_subtest_skip_reason,
> - },
> + .test_cases = wp_tests,
> };
> --
> 2.33.0.882.g93a45727a2-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-20 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-13 17:45 [PATCH v2 00/22] Start aligning perf test with kunit style Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 01/22] perf test: Use macro for "suite" declarations Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 02/22] perf test: Use macro for "suite" definitions Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 03/22] perf test: Make each test/suite its own struct Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 04/22] perf test: Move each test suite struct to its test Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 05/22] perf test: Rename struct test to test_suite Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 06/22] perf test: Add helper functions for abstraction Ian Rogers
2021-10-20 12:34 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-10-25 22:35 ` Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 07/22] perf test: Add test case struct Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 08/22] perf test: Add skip reason to test case Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 09/22] perf test: Convert pfm tests to use test cases Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 10/22] perf test: Convert pmu event tests to " Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 11/22] perf test: Convert watch point " Ian Rogers
2021-10-20 12:45 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2021-11-13 21:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-10-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 12/22] perf test: Convert clang " Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 13/22] perf test: Convert bpf " Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 14/22] perf test: Convert llvm " Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 15/22] perf test: Remove now unused subtest helpers Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 16/22] perf test: bp tests use test case Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 17/22] perf test: Convert time to tsc test to " Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 18/22] perf test: Remove non test case style support Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 19/22] perf test: BP tests, remove is_supported use Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 20/22] perf test: TSC test, " Ian Rogers
2021-10-13 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 21/22] perf test: Remove is_supported function Ian Rogers
2021-10-20 13:06 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-10-13 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 22/22] perf test: Remove skip_if_fail Ian Rogers
2021-10-20 12:14 ` [PATCH v2 00/22] Start aligning perf test with kunit style Jiri Olsa
2021-10-20 15:51 ` Ian Rogers
2021-10-28 23:52 ` Ian Rogers
2021-10-29 12:19 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-11-03 19:15 ` Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YXAPZIKwHbnLOL4b@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=pc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).