From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
jolsa@redhat.com, michael@ellerman.id.au, eranian@google.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, namhyung@kernel.org, kjain@linux.ibm.com,
atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tools/perf: Add bitfield_swap to handle branch_stack endian issue
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:32:48 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXqYcEu9flGFMHX1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211028113714.600549-1-maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Em Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 05:07:13PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan escreveu:
> branch_stack struct has bit field definition which
> produces different bit ordering for big/little endian.
> Because of this, when branch_stack sample is collected
> in a BE system and viewed/reported in a LE system, bit
> fields of the branch stack are not presented properly.
> To address this issue, a evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_stack()
> is defined and introduced in evsel__parse_sample.
Jiri,
This is a minor change, he just switched to an inline equivalent
(the code is slightly different, but should be ok), can I apply yout
v2 Acked-by tags?
- Arnaldo
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changelog v2:
> - used tep_is_bigendian() instead bigendian()
> to avoid perf test python fail.
>
> Changelog v1:
> - Renamed function and macro
> - Added comments in code
>
> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 13 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index dbfeceb2546c..4e929b9d9718 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -2221,6 +2221,54 @@ void __weak arch_perf_parse_sample_weight(struct perf_sample *data,
> data->weight = *array;
> }
>
> +u64 evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_flags(u64 value)
> +{
> + u64 new_val = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * branch_flags
> + * union {
> + * u64 values;
> + * struct {
> + * mispred:1 //target mispredicted
> + * predicted:1 //target predicted
> + * in_tx:1 //in transaction
> + * abort:1 //transaction abort
> + * cycles:16 //cycle count to last branch
> + * type:4 //branch type
> + * reserved:40
> + * }
> + * }
> + *
> + * Avoid bswap64() the entire branch_flag.value,
> + * as it has variable bit-field sizes. Instead the
> + * macro takes the bit-field position/size,
> + * swaps it based on the host endianness.
> + *
> + * tep_is_bigendian() is used here instead of
> + * bigendian() to avoid python test fails.
> + */
> + if (tep_is_bigendian()) {
> + new_val = bitfield_swap(value, 0, 1);
> + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 1, 1);
> + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 2, 1);
> + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 3, 1);
> + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 4, 16);
> + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 20, 4);
> + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 24, 40);
> + } else {
> + new_val = bitfield_swap(value, 63, 1);
> + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 62, 1);
> + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 61, 1);
> + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 60, 1);
> + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 44, 16);
> + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 40, 4);
> + new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 0, 40);
> + }
> +
> + return new_val;
> +}
> +
> int evsel__parse_sample(struct evsel *evsel, union perf_event *event,
> struct perf_sample *data)
> {
> @@ -2408,6 +2456,8 @@ int evsel__parse_sample(struct evsel *evsel, union perf_event *event,
> if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK) {
> const u64 max_branch_nr = UINT64_MAX /
> sizeof(struct branch_entry);
> + struct branch_entry *e;
> + unsigned int i;
>
> OVERFLOW_CHECK_u64(array);
> data->branch_stack = (struct branch_stack *)array++;
> @@ -2416,10 +2466,33 @@ int evsel__parse_sample(struct evsel *evsel, union perf_event *event,
> return -EFAULT;
>
> sz = data->branch_stack->nr * sizeof(struct branch_entry);
> - if (evsel__has_branch_hw_idx(evsel))
> + if (evsel__has_branch_hw_idx(evsel)) {
> sz += sizeof(u64);
> - else
> + e = &data->branch_stack->entries[0];
> + } else {
> data->no_hw_idx = true;
> + /*
> + * if the PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX is not applied,
> + * only nr and entries[] will be output by kernel.
> + */
> + e = (struct branch_entry *)&data->branch_stack->hw_idx;
> + }
> +
> + if (swapped) {
> + /*
> + * struct branch_flag does not have endian
> + * specific bit field definition. And bswap
> + * will not resolve the issue, since these
> + * are bit fields.
> + *
> + * evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_flags() uses a
> + * bitfield_swap macro to swap the bit position
> + * based on the host endians.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < data->branch_stack->nr; i++, e++)
> + e->flags.value = evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_flags(e->flags.value);
> + }
> +
> OVERFLOW_CHECK(array, sz, max_size);
> array = (void *)array + sz;
> }
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> index 1f7edfa8568a..2e82cdbe2c08 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> @@ -482,4 +482,17 @@ struct evsel *evsel__leader(struct evsel *evsel);
> bool evsel__has_leader(struct evsel *evsel, struct evsel *leader);
> bool evsel__is_leader(struct evsel *evsel);
> void evsel__set_leader(struct evsel *evsel, struct evsel *leader);
> +
> +/*
> + * Macro to swap the bit-field postition and size.
> + * Used when,
> + * - dont need to swap the entire u64 &&
> + * - when u64 has variable bit-field sizes &&
> + * - when presented in a host endian which is different
> + * than the source endian of the perf.data file
> + */
> +#define bitfield_swap(src, pos, size) \
> + ((((src) >> (pos)) & ((1ull << (size)) - 1)) << (63 - ((pos) + (size) - 1)))
> +
> +u64 evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_flags(u64 value);
> #endif /* __PERF_EVSEL_H */
> --
> 2.31.1
--
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-28 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-28 11:37 [PATCH v3 1/2] tools/perf: Add bitfield_swap to handle branch_stack endian issue Madhavan Srinivasan
2021-10-28 11:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] tools/perf/test: Add endian test for struct branch_flags Madhavan Srinivasan
2021-10-28 12:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YXqYcEu9flGFMHX1@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).