From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Shunsuke Nakamura <nakamura.shun@fujitsu.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, namhyung@kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] libperf: Move perf_counts_values__scale to tools/lib/perf
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:57:28 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZUYWAiI6HIWPhYj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YZE3Ia3UpHPx2/gh@krava>
Em Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 05:19:45PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 05:58:29PM +0900, Shunsuke Nakamura wrote:
> > Move perf_counts_values__scale from tools/perf/util to tools/lib/perf
> > so that it can be used with libperf.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shunsuke Nakamura <nakamura.shun@fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> > tools/lib/perf/evsel.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > tools/lib/perf/include/perf/evsel.h | 4 ++++
> > tools/lib/perf/libperf.map | 1 +
> > tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 19 -------------------
> > tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 3 ---
> > 5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c b/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> > index 8441e3e1aaac..5097aadea37a 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> > @@ -431,3 +431,22 @@ void perf_evsel__free_id(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
> > zfree(&evsel->id);
> > evsel->ids = 0;
> > }
> > +
> > +void perf_counts_values__scale(struct perf_counts_values *count,
> > + bool scale, s8 *pscaled)
> > +{
> > + s8 scaled = 0;
> > +
> > + if (scale) {
> > + if (count->run == 0) {
> > + scaled = -1;
> > + count->val = 0;
> > + } else if (count->run < count->ena) {
> > + scaled = 1;
> > + count->val = (u64)((double)count->val * count->ena / count->run);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (pscaled)
> > + *pscaled = scaled;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/evsel.h b/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/evsel.h
> > index 60eae25076d3..9013d73af22d 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/evsel.h
> > +++ b/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/evsel.h
> > @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
> >
> > #include <stdint.h>
> > #include <perf/core.h>
> > +#include <stdbool.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> >
> > struct perf_evsel;
> > struct perf_event_attr;
> > @@ -39,5 +41,7 @@ LIBPERF_API int perf_evsel__disable_cpu(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int cpu);
> > LIBPERF_API struct perf_cpu_map *perf_evsel__cpus(struct perf_evsel *evsel);
> > LIBPERF_API struct perf_thread_map *perf_evsel__threads(struct perf_evsel *evsel);
> > LIBPERF_API struct perf_event_attr *perf_evsel__attr(struct perf_evsel *evsel);
> > +LIBPERF_API void perf_counts_values__scale(struct perf_counts_values *count,
> > + bool scale, s8 *pscaled);
>
> not sure if we should use __s8 for pscaled now when it's exported?
> it's just we use it everywhere else with '__' prefix, I forgot what's
> the difference actually ;-)
I'm moving this to be __s8, following what is being used in
tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h.
> but other that all looks good, for the patchset:
>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
>
> thanks,
> jirka
>
>
> >
> > #endif /* __LIBPERF_EVSEL_H */
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/libperf.map b/tools/lib/perf/libperf.map
> > index 71468606e8a7..5979bf92d98f 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/perf/libperf.map
> > +++ b/tools/lib/perf/libperf.map
> > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ LIBPERF_0.0.1 {
> > perf_mmap__read_init;
> > perf_mmap__read_done;
> > perf_mmap__read_event;
> > + perf_counts_values__scale;
> > local:
> > *;
> > };
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > index dbfeceb2546c..49e4d0bdd7cc 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > @@ -1457,25 +1457,6 @@ void evsel__compute_deltas(struct evsel *evsel, int cpu, int thread,
> > count->run = count->run - tmp.run;
> > }
> >
> > -void perf_counts_values__scale(struct perf_counts_values *count,
> > - bool scale, s8 *pscaled)
> > -{
> > - s8 scaled = 0;
> > -
> > - if (scale) {
> > - if (count->run == 0) {
> > - scaled = -1;
> > - count->val = 0;
> > - } else if (count->run < count->ena) {
> > - scaled = 1;
> > - count->val = (u64)((double) count->val * count->ena / count->run);
> > - }
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (pscaled)
> > - *pscaled = scaled;
> > -}
> > -
> > static int evsel__read_one(struct evsel *evsel, int cpu, int thread)
> > {
> > struct perf_counts_values *count = perf_counts(evsel->counts, cpu, thread);
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> > index 1f7edfa8568a..8a6a4182c5fd 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> > @@ -190,9 +190,6 @@ static inline int evsel__nr_cpus(struct evsel *evsel)
> > return evsel__cpus(evsel)->nr;
> > }
> >
> > -void perf_counts_values__scale(struct perf_counts_values *count,
> > - bool scale, s8 *pscaled);
> > -
> > void evsel__compute_deltas(struct evsel *evsel, int cpu, int thread,
> > struct perf_counts_values *count);
> >
> > --
> > 2.27.0
> >
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-17 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-09 8:58 [PATCH v3 0/3] libperf: Unify scaling of counters obtained from perf_evsel__read() Shunsuke Nakamura
2021-11-09 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] libperf: Move perf_counts_values__scale to tools/lib/perf Shunsuke Nakamura
2021-11-14 16:19 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-11-17 14:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2021-11-29 7:59 ` nakamura.shun
2021-11-09 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] libperf: Remove scaling process from perf_mmap__read_self() Shunsuke Nakamura
2021-11-09 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] libperf tests: Add test_stat_multiplexing test Shunsuke Nakamura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YZUYWAiI6HIWPhYj@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nakamura.shun@fujitsu.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).